本文選題：商業(yè)秘密　切入點(diǎn)：侵權(quán)糾紛　出處：《北京化工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：商業(yè)秘密是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的重要組成部分，，是企業(yè)重要的無形財(cái)產(chǎn)，關(guān)系企業(yè)生存和發(fā)展。在我國國際貿(mào)易和交往日益頻繁的今天，國家和企業(yè)也日益重視對商業(yè)秘密的保護(hù)。但是實(shí)踐中商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)案件仍舊頻頻發(fā)生，受害人企業(yè)通過侵權(quán)損害賠償訴訟難于很好地保護(hù)自己，首先固然是因?yàn)檫@部分企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)意識單薄和保護(hù)手段缺失，其次，我國尚無專門的商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)法，對商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)牧⒎O其簡單，同時(shí)，在商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償案件中，商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償額的確定是案件審判的焦點(diǎn)，是所有商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)案件必須解決的問題，但是，其計(jì)算方法和范圍仍有許多值得探討的技術(shù)性問題。 本文圍繞商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)膯栴}，通過對我國立法情況進(jìn)行梳理，對中外商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償案例進(jìn)行分析研究，指出我國現(xiàn)有賠償中存在的問題，借鑒美日兩國的立法與實(shí)踐，對進(jìn)一步完善我國商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)挠?jì)算方法提出建議。本文分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分概述商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)母拍�、功能與目的、法理基礎(chǔ)及商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償責(zé)任的構(gòu)成要件。 第二部分分析我國商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)牧⒎ê退痉▽?shí)踐。首先，筆者對我國自改革開放以來商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)牧⒎ê退痉ń忉屵M(jìn)行了梳理，然后搜羅并分析我國各地區(qū)法院在商業(yè)商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)案件中的做法，最后通過具體案例分析指出我國目前立法和司法實(shí)踐中商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償計(jì)算方法方面的不足之處。 第三部分論述美國、日本、德國和臺灣地區(qū)商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)牧⒎ê蛯?shí)踐，總結(jié)這些國家和地區(qū)在商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償中的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 第四部分提出完善我國商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償計(jì)算方法的建議，包括明確計(jì)算公式中的因素，明確侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)姆秶�、建立懲罰性賠償制度等。
[Abstract]:Trade secret is an important component of intellectual property rights and an important intangible property of enterprises. It is related to the survival and development of enterprises. Today, with the increasing frequency of international trade and exchanges in China, The state and enterprises also pay more and more attention to the protection of trade secrets. However, in practice, trade secret infringement cases still occur frequently, and it is difficult for victim enterprises to protect themselves very well through tort damages litigation. First of all, it is because this part of the business secret protection consciousness is weak and the means of protection are lacking. Secondly, there is no special trade secret protection law in our country, and the legislation of compensation for trade secret infringement damage is extremely simple. At the same time, In the case of compensation for trade secret infringement damage, the determination of the amount of compensation for trade secret infringement is the focus of the case trial, and it is a problem that must be solved in all trade secret infringement cases. However, There are still many technical problems in the calculation method and scope. This paper focuses on the problem of compensation for infringement of trade secrets, through combing the legislative situation of our country, analyzes and studies the cases of compensation for infringement of trade secrets between China and foreign countries, and points out the problems existing in the present compensation of trade secrets in our country. Based on the legislation and practice of the United States and Japan, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to further improve the calculation method of the damages for the infringement of trade secrets in China. This paper is divided into four parts:. The first part summarizes the concept, function and purpose of the compensation for trade secret infringement damage, the legal basis and the constitutive requirements of the liability for trade secret infringement damage compensation. The second part analyzes the legislation and judicial practice of trade secret infringement compensation in China. Firstly, the author sorts out the legislative and judicial explanation of trade secret infringement compensation since the reform and opening up. Then it analyzes the practices of the commercial secret infringement cases in various district courts of our country, and points out the shortcomings of the calculation method of the trade secret infringement damages in the current legislation and judicial practice of our country through the concrete case analysis. The third part discusses the legislation and practice of the trade secret infringement compensation in the United States, Japan, Germany and Taiwan, and summarizes the experience of these countries and regions in the trade secret infringement compensation. In the 4th part, the author puts forward some suggestions for perfecting the calculation method of the tort damages in China's trade secrets, including the factors in the calculation formula, the scope of the damages for infringement and the establishment of the punitive damages system and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京化工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭學(xué)龍;美國EFCO公司訴Symons公司案淺析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年11期

2 徐朝賢;美、德、日商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)救濟(jì)制度的發(fā)展及借鑒[J];河北法學(xué);2001年02期

3 張會^H;;不同侵權(quán)責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式的構(gòu)成要件[J];河北法學(xué);2009年05期

4 韓中節(jié);;論侵犯商業(yè)秘密案件審判中的幾個(gè)問題[J];河北法學(xué);2009年09期

5 黃武雙;;美國商業(yè)秘密法的最新發(fā)展評析[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

6 黎樺;侵犯商業(yè)秘密的懲罰性賠償研究[J];科技與法律;2005年01期

7 黃武雙;;美國商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)賠償責(zé)任研究[J];科技與法律;2010年05期

8 李春華,王合新;美、日商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)救濟(jì)制度之比較[J];山東社會科學(xué);2003年06期

9 沈強(qiáng);;論商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動態(tài)與研究;2009年04期

10 李明德;杜邦公司訴克里斯托夫——美國商業(yè)秘密法研究[J];外國法譯評;2000年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔣紅蓮;商業(yè)秘密法律救濟(jì)制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 成娜;完善專利侵權(quán)制度的若干思考[D];煙臺大學(xué);2010年

2 董邦林;論完善我國商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)的民事救濟(jì)制度[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2001年

3 林志根;商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)及其民事司法救濟(jì)探討[D];湘潭大學(xué);2003年

4 韓愛珍;美國商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)損害賠償計(jì)算方法研究及借鑒[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：1614486