本文選題：商號　切入點(diǎn)：商號權(quán)　出處：《新疆大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：伴隨我國漸漸完善的市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體系，人們的法律意識越來越強(qiáng)了，，更懂得用權(quán)利和義務(wù)來保護(hù)自己，越來越多的人選擇用法律來保護(hù)自己，當(dāng)自己的權(quán)益受損時(shí)。在這樣的大環(huán)境下，研究商號權(quán)的保護(hù)無疑顯得非常必要和及時(shí)。盡管商號權(quán)的保護(hù)在國際上已經(jīng)有相當(dāng)長的歷史，在我國也得到越來越多的認(rèn)同，但如何通過法律形成有效的保護(hù)卻仍然是一個(gè)重要課題。商號權(quán)是一項(xiàng)重要的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，實(shí)踐表明，對于商號權(quán)的保護(hù)應(yīng)該納入知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的范疇我國對于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)正在逐步加強(qiáng)，在這樣一個(gè)大環(huán)境下，研究商號權(quán)理論，建立和完善我國商號權(quán)的保護(hù)制度，不僅具有理論意義，而且具有緊迫的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。全文一共分為四部分。第一部分為商號權(quán)的概述，包括：商號與商號權(quán)、商號權(quán)的性質(zhì)探討、商號權(quán)法律保護(hù)的意義。第二部分為我國商號權(quán)存在的問題分析，具體包括：現(xiàn)行法律沒有對商號進(jìn)行明確的定義和定性、我國缺少一部專門保護(hù)商號權(quán)的單行法、我國商號權(quán)管理體制上存在漏洞、我國商號權(quán)的排他效力和救濟(jì)效力不足、我國商號權(quán)與其他權(quán)利的保護(hù)缺乏協(xié)調(diào)。第三部分為域外對商號權(quán)保護(hù)制度的經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒，具體包括：域外商號權(quán)保護(hù)的立法模式的借鑒，域外商號權(quán)保護(hù)的內(nèi)容的借鑒，保護(hù)的救濟(jì)途徑的借鑒。第四部分為我國商號權(quán)保護(hù)的完善，包括：明確定義和定性商號，建立一部專門保護(hù)商號權(quán)的單行法，完善我國商號權(quán)管理體制，加強(qiáng)我國商號權(quán)的排他效力和救濟(jì)效力，協(xié)調(diào)好我國商號權(quán)與其他權(quán)利的保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:With the gradual improvement of the market economy system in our country, people's legal consciousness is getting stronger and stronger, and they know how to protect themselves with rights and obligations. More and more people choose to protect themselves by law. When one's own rights and interests are damaged. Under such circumstances, it is undoubtedly necessary and timely to study the protection of the right to trade name. Although the protection of the right of trade name has a long history in the world, it has also gained more and more recognition in our country. However, how to form effective protection by law is still an important issue. Trade name right is an important intellectual property right, which has been proved by practice. The protection of trade name right should be brought into the scope of intellectual property protection. In such a big environment, we should study the theory of trade name right and establish and perfect the protection system of trade name right in our country. It is not only of theoretical significance, but also of urgent practical significance. The full text is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of trade name rights, including: business name and trade name rights, the nature of business name rights, The second part is the analysis of the problems existing in the trade name right in our country, including: the current law does not have a clear definition and qualitative definition of the trade name, and there is a lack of a special law to protect the trade name right in our country. There are loopholes in the management system of trade name right in our country, the exclusive effect and relief effect of business name right in our country are insufficient, and the protection of trade name right and other rights in our country is not coordinated. It includes: the reference of the legislative mode of the protection of the right of foreign trade name, the reference of the content of the protection of the right of the foreign trade name, the reference of the relief way of the protection. 4th part is the perfection of the protection of the right of the trade name of our country, including: clear definition and qualitative business name, To establish a special law to protect the right of trade name, perfect the management system of the right of trade name in our country, strengthen the exclusive effect and relief effect of the right of trade name in our country, and coordinate the protection of the right of trade name and other rights in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邢冬生;;關(guān)于老字號保護(hù)問題的探討[J];中華商標(biāo);2008年09期

2 徐斯敏;;芻議商號權(quán)與商標(biāo)權(quán)的沖突[J];法制與社會;2012年13期

3 宋成;;淺析知名商號的立法保護(hù)[J];中國工商管理研究;2009年02期

4 金長鋒;吳海峰;;商號概念的重新界定及其權(quán)利保護(hù)[J];中國工商管理研究;2009年07期

5 牛玉科;;企業(yè)商號與商標(biāo)一體化策略研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2009年04期

6 劉寧;;我國商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)沖突的類型化分析與解決對策[J];科技與法律;2011年02期

7 楊異;吳蕾;;商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)沖突的比較法研究[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2008年10期

8 李燁;;淺析商號權(quán)和商標(biāo)權(quán)沖突的法律問題[J];學(xué)理論;2011年21期

9 饒世權(quán);劉鋒;;試論商號權(quán)的核心價(jià)值與立法保護(hù)[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2009年23期

10 王東強(qiáng);田書芹;;國外商號制度比較研究[J];世界標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化與質(zhì)量管理;2008年06期

本文編號：1605385