本文選題：商業(yè)方法專利　切入點：可專利性　出處：《華東政法大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：商業(yè)方法的可專利性一直是知識產權界的一個爭議熱點。雖然美、日、歐都陸續(xù)接受了商業(yè)方法專利，但他們各自對商業(yè)方法專利客體的審查標準和審查步驟也不盡相同。美國在Bilski案后對客體審查標準進行了大幅的調整。而我國對商業(yè)方法的可專利性并未在立法層面予以規(guī)制，對商業(yè)方法專利的授權也始終保持謹慎的態(tài)度，以嚴格的客體審查控制著授權率。審查實踐中，以專利法第2條第2款“非技術方案”為由否定可專利性的矛盾比較突出。 本文系統(tǒng)地梳理了美歐商業(yè)方法專利客體審查標準的演替和我國商業(yè)方法專利的客體審查標準，同時結合我國審查實踐，探討適應我國現(xiàn)實國情的客體審查方法。 本文由引言、主體部分和結語三大部分組成。引言中介紹了本文選題的背景、研究內容及研究方法，綜敘了國內外的研究現(xiàn)狀。本文的主體部分為第一章至第三章。第一章為商業(yè)方法專利的相關概念，主要介紹并厘清了與商業(yè)方法專利相關的幾個容易混淆的概念，具體包括：商業(yè)方法、商業(yè)方法專利、計算機軟件專利、可專利客體和技術性，并將本文的研究重點聚焦于“以利用計算機及網絡技術實施商業(yè)方法為主的發(fā)明的客體審查標準”上。第二章為美歐商業(yè)方法專利客體審查比較研究。本文選取美國和歐盟為代表，重點研究了這2個國家在商業(yè)方法專利客體審查上的歷史演進，詳細介紹了這2個國家現(xiàn)行的客體審查標準和具體的審查步驟。第三章為我國商業(yè)方法專利客體審查標準與完善建議。從我國現(xiàn)行的審查標準出發(fā)，結合具體的審查意見，，分析了我國現(xiàn)行審查標準中的問題和我國審查實踐中的制約，并借鑒國外審查經驗，對我國商業(yè)方法專利的客體審查提出了完善建議。結語中再次總結了“在現(xiàn)階段，我國可以從‘嚴格的客體審查’逐步向‘寬松的客體審查、嚴格的實質性條件審查’過渡，并根據實際情況把握商業(yè)方法專利的創(chuàng)造性標準”的觀點。
[Abstract]:The patentability of business methods has always been a controversial issue in the intellectual property field. Although the United States, Japan and Europe have accepted business process patents one after another, However, their standards and steps of examination of the object of business method patent are different. After the Bilski case, the United States has made a substantial adjustment to the object review standard, but the patentability of business method in China has not been regulated in the legislative level. In practice, the contradiction of denying patentability on the grounds of Article 2 (2) of Patent Law is obvious. This paper systematically combs the succession of the object examination standard of business method patent in America and Europe and the object examination standard of business method patent in our country. At the same time, combined with the examination practice of our country, this paper discusses the object examination method which adapts to the actual situation of our country. This paper is composed of three parts: introduction, main part and conclusion. The introduction introduces the background, research content and research methods of this topic. The main part of this paper is chapters 1 to 3. The first chapter is the related concepts of business method patent, which mainly introduces and clarifies several confusing concepts related to business method patent. Including: business method, business method patent, computer software patent, patentable object and technology, The research focus of this paper is on "Standards of object examination of inventions based on the use of computer and network technology". Chapter two is a comparative study of patent object review of business methods in the United States and Europe. The United States and the European Union are the representatives, Focusing on the historical evolution of the business method patent object review in these two countries, This paper introduces in detail the existing object examination standards and specific examination steps in these two countries. Chapter three is the standards and suggestions for the object examination of business method patents in China. This paper analyzes the problems in the current auditing standards of our country and the constraints in our country's audit practice, and draws lessons from the experience of foreign countries, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the object examination of the patent of business methods in our country. Our country can gradually transition from 'strict object examination' to 'loose object examination, strict substantive condition examination', and grasp the creative standard of business method patent according to the actual situation.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 唐昭紅;美國商業(yè)方法~1專利制度正當性分析[J];電子知識產權;2004年03期

2 余翔,劉珊;美國計算機軟件相關發(fā)明的專利保護及其與歐盟的比較[J];電子知識產權;2005年10期

3 袁建中;;歐洲專利局關于軟件專利保護客體之探討[J];電子知識產權;2009年09期

4 張平;商業(yè)方法軟件專利保護:美國的實踐及其啟示[J];法商研究;2005年04期

5 劉斌斌;;論商業(yè)方法專利的變遷和發(fā)展——以美國案例的分析和考察為視角[J];甘肅社會科學;2011年01期

6 陳健;;商業(yè)方法可專利性判斷標準研究[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年01期

7 李曉秋;;析商業(yè)方法的可專利性[J];政法論壇;2011年02期

8 張玉蓉;;美國商業(yè)方法專利爭論及司法實踐最新發(fā)展[J];中國科技論壇;2011年01期

9 王婷;宋河發(fā);曲婉;;主要國家商業(yè)方法專利的比較優(yōu)勢指數(shù)監(jiān)測[J];中國科技論壇;2011年06期

10 張平;論商業(yè)方法軟件專利保護的創(chuàng)造性標準——美、日、歐三方專利審查之比較[J];知識產權;2003年01期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 張玉蓉;金融商業(yè)方法專利策略研究[D];華中科技大學;2008年

本文編號：1595645