本文選題：商標(biāo)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：質(zhì)押　出處：《南京理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押作為一種特殊的權(quán)利質(zhì)押,既具有質(zhì)押的一般共性,又具有標(biāo)的物的無(wú)形性、不轉(zhuǎn)移標(biāo)的物的占有以及安全性、效益性等特點(diǎn)。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法針對(duì)商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押的規(guī)定存在著制度設(shè)計(jì)的缺失及配套制度不足等問(wèn)題,致使商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押未得到廣泛接受,其功能未得到充分發(fā)揮。完善我國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度,一方面應(yīng)該在商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押的個(gè)性基礎(chǔ)上擴(kuò)充其法律淵源,明確其客體范圍及設(shè)置程序；另一方面應(yīng)該健全質(zhì)押登記、價(jià)值評(píng)估等相關(guān)配套制度的建設(shè),以促進(jìn)商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度功能的充分發(fā)揮。 商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押,指的是債務(wù)人或者第三人,為保證到期債權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn),而對(duì)商標(biāo)專(zhuān)用權(quán)予以登記,在債務(wù)人到期不履行債務(wù)時(shí),債權(quán)人對(duì)登記的商標(biāo)專(zhuān)用權(quán)依法予以拍賣(mài)、變賣(mài),并對(duì)所得價(jià)款優(yōu)先受償?shù)臋?quán)利。商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押主要有以下特點(diǎn)：以商標(biāo)權(quán)作為權(quán)利標(biāo)的權(quán)利質(zhì)押；不以轉(zhuǎn)移占有為成立要件；具有較高的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性。 縱觀世界上發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的立法與實(shí)踐,雖然各國(guó)對(duì)于商標(biāo)權(quán)擔(dān)保的性質(zhì)是質(zhì)押還是抵押并沒(méi)有統(tǒng)一,各國(guó)在商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度設(shè)計(jì)上也存在著較大的差異,如美國(guó)并不區(qū)分質(zhì)押與抵押,而直接抽象為商標(biāo)權(quán)擔(dān)保交易的概念,但是各國(guó)均承認(rèn)商標(biāo)權(quán)是一種財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利,其能夠成為融資擔(dān)保的權(quán)利標(biāo)的,并在單獨(dú)的商標(biāo)法或知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)中對(duì)于商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押做出規(guī)定。 我國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度無(wú)論是在制度設(shè)計(jì)還是實(shí)現(xiàn)方式上都存在著一定的不足,因此,完善我國(guó)的商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度具有很大的意義。首先,可以從立法上完善我國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度：轉(zhuǎn)變登記方式,實(shí)行商標(biāo)質(zhì)押的“登記對(duì)抗主義”；并通過(guò)個(gè)性化立法,銜接商標(biāo)法與其他法律淵源。其次,完善我國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的配套制度：完善登記、操作等程序制度建設(shè)；增強(qiáng)商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押的可操作性；完善適合商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押的無(wú)形資產(chǎn)評(píng)估制度。
[Abstract]:As a kind of special pledge of rights, the pledge of trademark rights has not only the general generality of pledge, but also the intangibility of the subject matter. The current legislation of our country for the pledge of trademark rights has some problems, such as the lack of system design and the insufficiency of supporting system, which makes the pledge of trademark rights not widely accepted. To perfect the pledge system of trademark right in our country, on the one hand, we should expand its legal origin on the basis of the personality of the pledge of trademark right, and make clear the scope of its object and the procedure of setting up, on the other hand, we should perfect the registration of pledge. The construction of relevant supporting system, such as value evaluation, promotes the full play of the function of the pledge system of trademark rights. The pledge of trademark right means that the debtor or a third party, in order to ensure the realization of the due creditor's rights, registers the exclusive right to use the trademark, and when the debtor fails to perform the debt at maturity, the creditor shall auction and sell the registered exclusive right to use the trademark according to law, The pledge of trademark right has the following characteristics: the pledge of the right to take the trademark right as the mark of the right; not to transfer possession as the essential element; and to have a high risk. Throughout the legislation and practice of developed countries in the world, although the nature of trademark security is not unified, there are also great differences in the design of trademark pledge system. If the United States does not distinguish between pledge and mortgage, it is directly abstracted as the concept of trademark right security transaction, but all countries recognize trademark right as a kind of property right, which can be the subject of the right of financing security. And in a separate trademark law or intellectual property rights for the pledge of trademark provisions. There are some deficiencies in the system design and realization of the pledge system of trademark right in our country. Therefore, it is of great significance to perfect the pledge system of trademark right in our country. We can perfect the pledge system of trademark right in our country from the legislation: change the way of registration, carry out the "registration antagonism" of trademark pledge, and link up the trademark law with other legal sources through individualized legislation. Secondly, Perfect our country trademark right pledge system supporting system: perfect registration, operation and other procedural system construction; enhance the operability of trademark pledge; perfect trademark pledge for intangible assets evaluation system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王春;;商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押若干問(wèn)題[J];中華商標(biāo);2006年02期

2 張韶華;;商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及評(píng)估[J];中華商標(biāo);2007年01期

3 程宗璋;我國(guó)質(zhì)押制度簡(jiǎn)析[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期

4 盧平，，趙開(kāi)鈞，雷體華;對(duì)我國(guó)無(wú)形資產(chǎn)評(píng)估立法問(wèn)題的思考[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1996年03期

5 曲華君;;質(zhì)押擔(dān)保制度存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年02期

6 王菊英;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押芻議[J];淮北煤師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年01期

7 蔣翔;;論票據(jù)質(zhì)押之設(shè)立方式[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年12期

8 朱英法;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押貸款問(wèn)題探討[J];金融理論與實(shí)踐;2004年02期

9 郭玉坤;于穎;;我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押的立法價(jià)值、現(xiàn)狀及建議[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2008年07期

10 李力;曾鳳章;;談?wù)跈?quán)特許經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)上的權(quán)利質(zhì)押[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2008年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 喻磊;中國(guó)（大陸）社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期的民法價(jià)值研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

2 郭之祥;商標(biāo)與企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 王鵬超;商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押的困境及化解困境的路徑選擇[D];河南大學(xué);2011年

2 王紅蘭;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押價(jià)值評(píng)估方法研究[D];長(zhǎng)安大學(xué);2011年

3 段世平;商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2004年

4 賀歡;商標(biāo)權(quán)擔(dān)保制度研究[D];中南大學(xué);2007年

5 邵珠鵬;論商標(biāo)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1570033