本文選題：商標權　切入點：質(zhì)押　出處：《南京理工大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：商標權質(zhì)押作為一種特殊的權利質(zhì)押,既具有質(zhì)押的一般共性,又具有標的物的無形性、不轉(zhuǎn)移標的物的占有以及安全性、效益性等特點。我國現(xiàn)行立法針對商標權質(zhì)押的規(guī)定存在著制度設計的缺失及配套制度不足等問題,致使商標權質(zhì)押未得到廣泛接受,其功能未得到充分發(fā)揮。完善我國商標權質(zhì)押制度,一方面應該在商標權質(zhì)押的個性基礎上擴充其法律淵源,明確其客體范圍及設置程序；另一方面應該健全質(zhì)押登記、價值評估等相關配套制度的建設,以促進商標權質(zhì)押制度功能的充分發(fā)揮。 商標權質(zhì)押,指的是債務人或者第三人,為保證到期債權的實現(xiàn),而對商標專用權予以登記,在債務人到期不履行債務時,債權人對登記的商標專用權依法予以拍賣、變賣,并對所得價款優(yōu)先受償?shù)臋嗬Ｉ虡藱噘|(zhì)押主要有以下特點：以商標權作為權利標的權利質(zhì)押；不以轉(zhuǎn)移占有為成立要件；具有較高的風險性。 縱觀世界上發(fā)達國家的立法與實踐,雖然各國對于商標權擔保的性質(zhì)是質(zhì)押還是抵押并沒有統(tǒng)一,各國在商標權質(zhì)押制度設計上也存在著較大的差異,如美國并不區(qū)分質(zhì)押與抵押,而直接抽象為商標權擔保交易的概念,但是各國均承認商標權是一種財產(chǎn)權利,其能夠成為融資擔保的權利標的,并在單獨的商標法或知識產(chǎn)權中對于商標權質(zhì)押做出規(guī)定。 我國商標權質(zhì)押制度無論是在制度設計還是實現(xiàn)方式上都存在著一定的不足,因此,完善我國的商標權質(zhì)押制度具有很大的意義。首先,可以從立法上完善我國商標權質(zhì)押制度：轉(zhuǎn)變登記方式,實行商標質(zhì)押的“登記對抗主義”；并通過個性化立法,銜接商標法與其他法律淵源。其次,完善我國商標權質(zhì)押制度的配套制度：完善登記、操作等程序制度建設；增強商標權質(zhì)押的可操作性；完善適合商標權質(zhì)押的無形資產(chǎn)評估制度。
[Abstract]:As a kind of special pledge of rights, the pledge of trademark rights has not only the general generality of pledge, but also the intangibility of the subject matter. The current legislation of our country for the pledge of trademark rights has some problems, such as the lack of system design and the insufficiency of supporting system, which makes the pledge of trademark rights not widely accepted. To perfect the pledge system of trademark right in our country, on the one hand, we should expand its legal origin on the basis of the personality of the pledge of trademark right, and make clear the scope of its object and the procedure of setting up, on the other hand, we should perfect the registration of pledge. The construction of relevant supporting system, such as value evaluation, promotes the full play of the function of the pledge system of trademark rights. The pledge of trademark right means that the debtor or a third party, in order to ensure the realization of the due creditor's rights, registers the exclusive right to use the trademark, and when the debtor fails to perform the debt at maturity, the creditor shall auction and sell the registered exclusive right to use the trademark according to law, The pledge of trademark right has the following characteristics: the pledge of the right to take the trademark right as the mark of the right; not to transfer possession as the essential element; and to have a high risk. Throughout the legislation and practice of developed countries in the world, although the nature of trademark security is not unified, there are also great differences in the design of trademark pledge system. If the United States does not distinguish between pledge and mortgage, it is directly abstracted as the concept of trademark right security transaction, but all countries recognize trademark right as a kind of property right, which can be the subject of the right of financing security. And in a separate trademark law or intellectual property rights for the pledge of trademark provisions. There are some deficiencies in the system design and realization of the pledge system of trademark right in our country. Therefore, it is of great significance to perfect the pledge system of trademark right in our country. We can perfect the pledge system of trademark right in our country from the legislation: change the way of registration, carry out the "registration antagonism" of trademark pledge, and link up the trademark law with other legal sources through individualized legislation. Secondly, Perfect our country trademark right pledge system supporting system: perfect registration, operation and other procedural system construction; enhance the operability of trademark pledge; perfect trademark pledge for intangible assets evaluation system.
【學位授予單位】：南京理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王春;;商標權質(zhì)押若干問題[J];中華商標;2006年02期

2 張韶華;;商標權質(zhì)押融資的風險及評估[J];中華商標;2007年01期

3 程宗璋;我國質(zhì)押制度簡析[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2000年04期

4 盧平，，趙開鈞，雷體華;對我國無形資產(chǎn)評估立法問題的思考[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1996年03期

5 曲華君;;質(zhì)押擔保制度存在的問題及對策研究[J];法制與社會;2010年02期

6 王菊英;知識產(chǎn)權質(zhì)押芻議[J];淮北煤師院學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年01期

7 蔣翔;;論票據(jù)質(zhì)押之設立方式[J];哈爾濱學院學報;2011年12期

8 朱英法;知識產(chǎn)權質(zhì)押貸款問題探討[J];金融理論與實踐;2004年02期

9 郭玉坤;于穎;;我國知識產(chǎn)權質(zhì)押的立法價值、現(xiàn)狀及建議[J];科技進步與對策;2008年07期

10 李力;曾鳳章;;談政府授權特許經(jīng)營權上的權利質(zhì)押[J];商業(yè)時代;2008年07期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 喻磊;中國（大陸）社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期的民法價值研究[D];武漢大學;2005年

2 郭之祥;商標與企業(yè)競爭行為[D];山東大學;2009年

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 王鵬超;商標權質(zhì)押的困境及化解困境的路徑選擇[D];河南大學;2011年

2 王紅蘭;知識產(chǎn)權質(zhì)押價值評估方法研究[D];長安大學;2011年

3 段世平;商標權質(zhì)押研究[D];湖南大學;2004年

4 賀歡;商標權擔保制度研究[D];中南大學;2007年

5 邵珠鵬;論商標權質(zhì)押制度[D];山東大學;2008年

本文編號：1570033