本文關(guān)鍵詞： 寺廟 寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益 私法救濟(jì)　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：寺廟的生存和發(fā)展離不開(kāi)其所處的時(shí)代大背景,隨著中國(guó)改革開(kāi)放以來(lái)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅猛發(fā)展,商業(yè)化、市場(chǎng)化趨勢(shì)也逐擴(kuò)散到宗教財(cái)產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域。社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展必然引起各種社會(huì)關(guān)系的變化,寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利關(guān)系也不能避免,因之而起的糾紛也日漸增多。由于目前國(guó)內(nèi)法上寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)在法律上地位的不甚明確,調(diào)整方式欠缺法定性和可持續(xù)性等問(wèn)題的存在,致使司法機(jī)關(guān)在實(shí)踐中處理具體個(gè)案時(shí)無(wú)所適從,一些涉寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)問(wèn)題方面的法律糾紛尚無(wú)妥當(dāng)完善的解決途徑。本文通過(guò)司法實(shí)踐和理論研究的方式展開(kāi)對(duì)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益私法救濟(jì)的探討,闡釋在當(dāng)前國(guó)內(nèi)法律體系中寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)的私法界定,并以此為切入點(diǎn)通過(guò)對(duì)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)法律關(guān)系及寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)范疇進(jìn)行剖析,深入探究了寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益受侵害后如何從私法層面進(jìn)行保護(hù)的救濟(jì)途徑,進(jìn)而提出了解決此類法律糾紛問(wèn)題的建議和方法。本文從四個(gè)層面展開(kāi)闡述:第一部分寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)的私法界定及法律救濟(jì)的必要性。通過(guò)對(duì)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)的涵義及其范疇的界定,延展出對(duì)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)進(jìn)行救濟(jì)的必要性和適度性。從司法實(shí)踐、我國(guó)現(xiàn)行宗教政策立法及法治建設(shè)的角度探討涉及廟產(chǎn)糾紛私法救濟(jì)介入的必要性。第二部分我國(guó)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益私法救濟(jì)現(xiàn)狀及評(píng)析。通過(guò)對(duì)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)的立法現(xiàn)狀和司法現(xiàn)狀的闡述,進(jìn)而對(duì)私法救濟(jì)的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)進(jìn)行詳細(xì)評(píng)析。第三部分國(guó)外宗教財(cái)產(chǎn)保護(hù)救濟(jì)的比較研究及啟示。通過(guò)對(duì)不同國(guó)家和地區(qū)關(guān)于宗教財(cái)產(chǎn)保護(hù)的法律法規(guī)中私法救濟(jì)機(jī)制的比較分析,深入探討涉及寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)糾紛處理中其他救濟(jì)方式的局限性及主要解決思路,從中得出借鑒經(jīng)驗(yàn)和啟示,進(jìn)而探索出適合中國(guó)國(guó)情的私法救濟(jì)之路。第四部分完善中國(guó)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)私法救濟(jì)機(jī)制的建議。通過(guò)對(duì)現(xiàn)行立法和司法實(shí)踐的研究,嘗試從物權(quán)法、侵權(quán)責(zé)任法、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法等私法領(lǐng)域構(gòu)建和完善寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益的保護(hù)救濟(jì)機(jī)制的建議,以期選擇最有效的救濟(jì)途徑和方式。
[Abstract]:The survival and development of temples can not be separated from the background of the times in which they live. With the rapid development and commercialization of the market economy since China's reform and opening up, The trend of marketization also spread to the field of religious property one by one. The development of social economy will inevitably lead to changes in various social relations, and the relationship between temple property rights and property rights cannot be avoided. As a result, disputes have been increasing. Due to the fact that the legal status of temple property in domestic law is not clear at present, there are problems such as lack of legality and sustainability in the way of adjustment. Causing the judicial organs to deal with specific cases in practice at a loss, Some legal disputes concerning temple property have not been solved properly. This paper discusses the private law relief of temple property rights and interests by means of judicial practice and theoretical research. This paper expounds the definition of temple property in the current domestic legal system, and analyzes the legal relationship between temple property and temple property through the analysis of the legal relationship of temple property and the category of temple property. How to protect the temple property rights and interests from the level of private law is deeply explored. The first part is about the definition of temple property in private law and the necessity of legal remedy, through the definition of the meaning and scope of temple property. Extending the necessity and appropriateness of relief to temple property. This paper discusses the necessity of the intervention of private law relief involving temple property disputes from the angle of current religious policy legislation and the construction of rule of law in our country. The second part is about the present situation and evaluation of private law relief of temple property rights and interests. An account of the state of law and the state of justice, Then the advantages and disadvantages of private law relief are analyzed in detail. The third part is the comparative study and enlightenment of foreign religious property protection relief. Through the comparative analysis of private law relief mechanism in different countries and regions on religious property protection laws and regulations, the third part is the comparative analysis of private law relief mechanism in different countries and regions on the protection of religious property. The limitations and main solutions of other relief methods involved in the handling of temple property disputes are discussed in depth, from which we can draw lessons from experience and enlightenments. Then it explores the path of private law relief suitable for China's national conditions. 4th part of the suggestions to improve the relief mechanism of Chinese temple property private law. Through the study of current legislation and judicial practice, try from the property law, tort liability law, Suggestions on how to establish and perfect the relief mechanism of temple property rights and interests in the field of private law, such as intellectual property law, in order to choose the most effective ways and means of relief.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.15

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 毛起雄;《歸僑僑眷權(quán)益保護(hù)法》關(guān)于歸僑、僑眷經(jīng)濟(jì)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益的法律規(guī)定[J];海內(nèi)與海外;2001年10期

2 王永杰;;我國(guó)被害人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益保護(hù)制度的反思與重構(gòu)[J];南都學(xué)壇;2009年01期

3 王琪;;構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)不容忽視的問(wèn)題——對(duì)我國(guó)離婚婦女財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益保障的思考[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

4 王琪;;經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)視閾的離婚婦女財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益[J];求索;2006年07期

5 殷積松;;財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益弱化之下女性人格權(quán)的考量[J];人民論壇;2010年17期

6 郭婭麗;;特定群體人格權(quán)益與財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益沖突的解決思路——“娃娃股東”事件評(píng)判的另一個(gè)視角[J];山西高等學(xué)校社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

7 溫銳;李永安;;十六大以來(lái)農(nóng)民土地財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益保障改革的進(jìn)程與展望[J];中共黨史研究;2012年07期

8 李林章;劉愛(ài)武;;六個(gè)字挽回37萬(wàn)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益[J];中國(guó)審判;2014年04期

9 何瀟;土地征用改革——保護(hù)農(nóng)民土地財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益的積極探索[J];中國(guó)監(jiān)察;2005年09期

10 王元麟;;論農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益的保障與社會(huì)主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年05期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 曹鳳國(guó);田強(qiáng);;對(duì)非財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益執(zhí)行的正當(dāng)性研究[A];全國(guó)法院第25屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募汗痉ㄅc行政法實(shí)施問(wèn)題研究（上冊(cè)）[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 記者馬揚(yáng) 蔡敏 姚遠(yuǎn);保障農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益首次寫(xiě)入報(bào)告[N];新華每日電訊;2013年

2 本報(bào)記者 徐錦庚 卞民德 潘俊強(qiáng);充分保障農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

3 徐恒杰;維護(hù)農(nóng)民土地財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益需要銳意改革[N];農(nóng)民日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

4 張洪松 市農(nóng)委;探索落實(shí)農(nóng)民的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益[N];重慶日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

5 本報(bào)記者 王海平;推進(jìn)土地確權(quán),保障農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào)道;2013年

6 侯雪松;公司注銷后其享有的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益如何處理?[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2007年

7 張一然;離婚時(shí)，，如何保障婦女的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益[N];中國(guó)婦女報(bào);2014年

8 本報(bào)記者 史玉根;財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益應(yīng)該未雨綢繆[N];中國(guó)婦女報(bào);2009年

9 金勇;村民自治成為侵害婦女權(quán)益的擋箭牌[N];中國(guó)婦女報(bào);2007年

10 謝云挺;“農(nóng)嫁女”財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益受保護(hù)[N];溫州日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙書(shū)波;美術(shù)作品作者財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益保護(hù)研究[D];中國(guó)藝術(shù)研究院;2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 任天華;寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益的私法救濟(jì)機(jī)制研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2017年

2 楊璇;離婚女性財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益保護(hù)研究[D];西南大學(xué);2015年

3 馬素德;論穆斯林婦女離婚中的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益保護(hù)[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

4 鄔文婷;我國(guó)農(nóng)村婦女離婚時(shí)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益保障研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2016年

5 袁文素;村民委員會(huì)的角色[D];云南大學(xué);2016年

6 韋遠(yuǎn)利;離婚婦女財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益保障制度研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2016年

7 石婧;經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)視角下的女性財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益保護(hù)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

8 孫卉;論人格標(biāo)識(shí)上財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益的民法調(diào)整[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

9 段榮芳;論我國(guó)離婚婦女財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益的法律保護(hù)[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

10 唐年華;我國(guó)婦女財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益法律保護(hù)問(wèn)題探析[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1543192