本文關(guān)鍵詞： 知識產(chǎn)權(quán) 擔(dān)保融資 擔(dān)保性質(zhì) 價值評估　出處：《云南財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中小企業(yè)作為我國國民經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的重要力量，在增加就業(yè)崗位、吸納新增勞動力、擴大出口能力和穩(wěn)定國內(nèi)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展等方面，起著極為重要的作用。但是中小企業(yè)的融資困難問題卻不僅是伴隨著中小企業(yè)產(chǎn)生與發(fā)展，同時也成為制約中小企業(yè)持續(xù)、穩(wěn)定發(fā)展的一個重要因素。而知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保則可以為企業(yè)的融資困難提供一個新的解決途徑，但因知識產(chǎn)權(quán)本身的特性，目前國內(nèi)對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)用來擔(dān)保的性質(zhì)、對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)實現(xiàn)方式、價值評估等方面的情況還沒有一個統(tǒng)一的認識。本文通過對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保融資中所涉及的相關(guān)概念和制度進行理清，并對其價值評估制度進行初步的探討，提出建立具有公信力知識產(chǎn)權(quán)評價機制的建設(shè)框架，以期對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保的相關(guān)制度的完善作出微薄的貢獻。 本文通過文獻閱讀、理論聯(lián)系實際、比較分析等方法對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保融資的法律定位（第二章節(jié)）進行梳理，同時通過對美、日及臺灣地區(qū)的以知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保的現(xiàn)狀進行比較分析（第三章節(jié)）進而對我國的以知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保融資的現(xiàn)狀進行初步的分析（第四章節(jié)），從而提出完善我國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保融資制度的構(gòu)想（第五章節(jié)）。 個人認為文章的創(chuàng)新之處主要在于第二章節(jié)、第四章節(jié)的對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保融資的法律定位的現(xiàn)狀進行梳理分析，并在第五章節(jié)中提出具有公信力的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保評估制度的設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:As an important force in the development of our national economy, small and medium-sized enterprises have increased employment, absorbed new labor force, expanded export capacity and stabilized domestic economic development. But the financing difficulties of small and medium-sized enterprises are not only accompanied by the emergence and development of small and medium-sized enterprises, but also become a constraint to the sustainability of small and medium-sized enterprises. The guarantee of intellectual property rights can provide a new way to solve the financing difficulties of enterprises. However, due to the nature of intellectual property rights themselves, the nature of domestic intellectual property rights is currently used as a guarantee. There is not a unified understanding of the way in which intellectual property rights are realized and the evaluation of value. This paper clarifies the relevant concepts and systems involved in the financing of intellectual property security. This paper also makes a preliminary discussion on the evaluation system of intellectual property rights and puts forward a framework for establishing a credible evaluation mechanism of intellectual property rights in order to make a modest contribution to the perfection of the relevant system of intellectual property guarantee. This paper combs the legal position of IPR secured financing by literature reading, combining theory with practice, comparative analysis and so on. At the same time, it combs the legal position of IPR secured financing (Chapter 2), and at the same time, through the United States, A Comparative Analysis of the current situation of IPR guarantee in Japan and Taiwan (Chapter 3) and a preliminary Analysis of the current situation of IPR secured financing in China (Chapter 4th), thus proposing the improvement of China's knowledge. The conception of security financing system of property right (5th chapter). I think the innovation of the article mainly lies in the second chapter, 4th chapter of the legal positioning of intellectual property rights secured financing to sort out and analyze the current situation. And in 5th chapter puts forward the credible intellectual property right guarantee appraisal system idea.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4;D923.2;D923
，

本文編號：1540705