本文關(guān)鍵詞： 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán) 信托 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)化 資產(chǎn)證券化　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 隨著知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的到來,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)作為一種無形資產(chǎn),在資本市場(chǎng)中的地位越來越突出。但是,目前國(guó)內(nèi)面臨著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)造力不足、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)人融資困難、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)化率低等困境,迫切尋找一條既能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)融資、提高知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)利用效率、促進(jìn)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)化,又能夠激勵(lì)創(chuàng)新的新途徑。國(guó)外將信托制度——這項(xiàng)在財(cái)產(chǎn)管理領(lǐng)域功勛卓著的制度——引入知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)化市場(chǎng),知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托開始興起。本文根據(jù)國(guó)內(nèi)的實(shí)際需要,借鑒國(guó)外的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn),將信托這種金融工具運(yùn)用于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)化市場(chǎng),以期對(duì)提高我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)利用效率有所陴益。以此為出發(fā)點(diǎn),本文以運(yùn)用信托手段管理知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為主要論點(diǎn),論證了信托與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)相結(jié)合的必要性;根據(jù)一般財(cái)產(chǎn)信托的基本理論與法律規(guī)定,闡述了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度的基本內(nèi)容;對(duì)完善我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托提出了建議。 本文分為四個(gè)部分: 第一部分分析了國(guó)內(nèi)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)化的障礙。正文開篇以資本重心從有形資產(chǎn)到無形資產(chǎn)的轉(zhuǎn)移,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)資本逐漸成為資本市場(chǎng)的主導(dǎo)為切入點(diǎn),指明知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)已經(jīng)成為企業(yè)在全球市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中的焦點(diǎn)。但是,我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)化面臨著三個(gè)方面的問題:一是知識(shí)創(chuàng)新能力和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)管理能力明顯不足;二是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)化率較低,很大一部分知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沒有得到有效利用;三是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)人很難依靠知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)獲得融資,迫切需要一種新的融資手段。 第二部分著重論述了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與信托制度相結(jié)合的必要性。首先,筆者概述了信托制度的由來和基本理念,闡明了將信托制度引入知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的設(shè)想。其次,筆者介紹了國(guó)外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托的情況。最后,筆者論述了信托制度本身的巨大優(yōu)勢(shì),這些優(yōu)勢(shì)包括可以提高知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)化、促進(jìn)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)融資、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)人利益最大化、激勵(lì)創(chuàng)新等等,這些優(yōu)勢(shì)正契合于解決我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)面臨的困境,從而論證了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托的必要性。 第三部分筆者論述了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度,是本文的核心。首先,筆者概述了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托的運(yùn)行機(jī)制,即簽訂信托合同、進(jìn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托登記、信托機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)信托知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)進(jìn)行管理。其次,筆者論述了作為信托財(cái)產(chǎn)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的范圍、歸屬和特性。再次,筆者論述了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律關(guān)系中三方當(dāng)事人,即委托人、受托人、受益人及其權(quán)利和義務(wù)關(guān)系。最后,筆者論述了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托終止的事由及其法律效力。 第四部分筆者提出了完善我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托的幾點(diǎn)建議。首先,筆者概述了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托在目前我國(guó)法律上的合法性。其次,通過一個(gè)典型的案例分析了我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托的現(xiàn)狀和存在的問題。最后,為完善我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托制度,筆者提出了五點(diǎn)建議,作拋磚引玉。其中筆者重點(diǎn)論述了我國(guó)應(yīng)建立知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托登記制度,以及該制度的具體構(gòu)建。此外,為了能夠推廣知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托,國(guó)家在稅收及其他政策上應(yīng)給予政策傾斜。 本文以促進(jìn)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)化為目的,主張運(yùn)用信托這種金融工具對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)進(jìn)行專業(yè)化的管理,力圖將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)人的利益最大化,激勵(lì)創(chuàng)新,以進(jìn)一步提高我國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)研發(fā)能力,增強(qiáng)企業(yè)國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力。
[Abstract]:With the advent of knowledge economy, intellectual property is a kind of intangible assets, in the capital market is becoming more and more prominent. However, the current domestic intellectual property facing the lack of creativity, intellectual property intellectual property financing difficulties, low industrialization rate of urgent predicament, find a can realize financing, improve the IPR utilization efficiency. To promote the industrialization of IPR, and new ways of encouraging innovation. The foreign trust system -- the property management area of outstanding contributions in the system: the introduction of intellectual property transfer market, intellectual property trust began to rise. According to the actual needs of the domestic and foreign successful experience, that trust should be used in intellectual property into the market, in order to improve the utilization efficiency of intellectual property rights in China have good effect. As a starting point, this paper use the trust management of intellectual property As the main point, the right demonstrates the necessity of the combination of trust and intellectual property. According to the basic theory and legal provisions of general property trust, it expounds the basic contents of the legal system of intellectual property trust, and puts forward some suggestions for improving China's intellectual property trust.
This article is divided into four parts:
The first part analyzes the domestic industrialization of intellectual property barriers. The text begins with the focus of capital from the transfer of tangible and intangible assets, intellectual capital has become the dominant capital market as the starting point, indicating the competition of intellectual property rights has become the focus of enterprise competition in the global market. However, China's intellectual property industry faces three problems: one is the knowledge innovation ability and intellectual property management capacity is obviously insufficient; two is the intellectual property industrialization rate is low, a large part of intellectual property rights has not been effectively utilized; three is the owner of intellectual property is difficult to rely on intellectual property to obtain financing, there is an urgent need for a new means of financing.
The second part focuses on the necessity of combining intellectual property system and the trust. First of all, the author summarizes the origin of the trust system and the basic idea, explains that the idea of the trust system into intellectual property. Secondly, the author introduces the foreign intellectual property trust. Finally, the author discusses the great advantages of the trust system itself. These advantages include can improve the industrialization of intellectual property rights, the promotion of intellectual property financing, to maximize the interests of intellectual property, innovation and so on, these advantages is fit to deal with the plight of China's intellectual property rights, which demonstrates the necessity of intellectual property trust.
The third part discusses the legal system of intellectual property trust, is the core of this paper. Firstly, the author summarizes the operational mechanism of intellectual property trust, the trust contract signed, intellectual property trust registration, trust management of intellectual property trust. Secondly, the author discusses the scope of intellectual property rights as the trust property, ownership and characteristics. Thirdly, the author discusses the legal relationship of intellectual property rights trust in three parties, namely trustor, trustee, beneficiary and the rights and obligations. At last, the author discusses the termination of IPR trust and its legal effect.
The fourth part, the author puts forward several suggestions to perfect our country's intellectual property trust. First of all, the author summarizes the intellectual property trust in the legitimacy of the law of our country at present. Secondly, through a typical case study of the status quo of China's intellectual property trust and analyzes the existing problems. Finally, in order to improve the trust system in China intellectual property rights, the author puts forward five suggestions for start. Among them, the author discusses the intellectual property trust registration system should be established in China, as well as the specific construction of the system. In addition, in order to promote intellectual property trust, the state should give preferential policies in tax and other policies.
In order to promote the industrialization of IPR for the purpose of specialization of intellectual property trust advocated the use of the financial instruments management, trying to maximize the interests of intellectual property rights, encourage innovation, to further improve China's intellectual property research and development ability, enhance the international competitiveness of enterprises.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D922.282

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳霞;專利資產(chǎn)證券化法律問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉霞;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

2 邵文猛;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年

3 庾寒蕊;我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1538840