本文關(guān)鍵詞： 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)托管 托管服務(wù) 發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀 對策研究　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度發(fā)展至今已經(jīng)日趨成熟，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)托管推動了中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)服務(wù)業(yè)的更進(jìn)一步完善。與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)代理及信托有一定區(qū)別的托管服務(wù)模式首先在北京中關(guān)村進(jìn)行了試點。在對相關(guān)企業(yè)進(jìn)行知識產(chǎn)權(quán)托管之后，北京中關(guān)村各企業(yè)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)申請量及授權(quán)量顯著增加。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)在量上的增加直接反映了知識的技術(shù)化，而技術(shù)的廣泛運用又推動了創(chuàng)新進(jìn)程的加速�？梢�，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)托管模式的運用使技術(shù)創(chuàng)新形成了一種良性循環(huán)，能夠推動中國經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。 然而，中國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)托管制度還處于發(fā)展的初級階段，還存在制度設(shè)計不完善、機(jī)構(gòu)運作效率較低、實現(xiàn)渠道不通暢等方面的問題。首先，托管服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)發(fā)展存在三個方面的外部阻力：第一，大量中小企業(yè)對托管服務(wù)的適應(yīng)性明顯不夠，中國70%以上的企業(yè)為中小企業(yè)，中小企業(yè)在經(jīng)濟(jì)能力、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)化力等方面有較大劣勢，其知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)意識和需求都不夠強(qiáng)烈，這是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)托管在中國未來發(fā)展中遇到的最大挑戰(zhàn)；第二，政府在政策上并沒有提供足夠的支持，缺乏規(guī)范該制度發(fā)展的相應(yīng)法律法規(guī)，導(dǎo)致知識產(chǎn)權(quán)托管服務(wù)行業(yè)的準(zhǔn)入門檻過低，托管服務(wù)提供商參差不齊、服務(wù)質(zhì)量不穩(wěn)定；第三，在托管服務(wù)提供商與托管客戶之間存在嚴(yán)重的信息不對稱，托管服務(wù)商的服務(wù)能力、服務(wù)水平和服務(wù)質(zhì)量等無法直接展現(xiàn)給托管客戶，導(dǎo)致提供托管服務(wù)的機(jī)構(gòu)與托管客戶企業(yè)之間存在著巨大的信用障礙。其次，從托管服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)內(nèi)部看，托管服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)自我角色的定位、托管服務(wù)提供的方式、托管服務(wù)內(nèi)容的設(shè)計等方面存在大量問題尚待解決，這使得現(xiàn)階段大量的托管服務(wù)不能完全滿足客戶需求。 筆者試圖根據(jù)中國的現(xiàn)實情況對中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)托管服務(wù)發(fā)展中的上述瓶頸進(jìn)行研究并嘗試提出一些解決的建議，以期推動知識產(chǎn)權(quán)托管制度在中國的順利實施。筆者認(rèn)為可借鑒涂俊、吳貴生等提出的“三螺旋”的理念，從加強(qiáng)相關(guān)制度建設(shè)、提升托管機(jī)構(gòu)服務(wù)能力、拓展托管服務(wù)實現(xiàn)渠道等方面著手改革和完善，政府、托管服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)、托管客戶企業(yè)三方主體共同努力，相互配合，指導(dǎo)中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)托管順利地推廣。
[Abstract]:Chinese development since the intellectual property system has become increasingly mature, intellectual property trust promote China intellectual property services industry to further improve the model. There are certain differences hosting services and intellectual property agency and trust first in Beijing Zhongguancun conducted a pilot. After the intellectual property trust to the relevant enterprises, Beijing Zhongguancun enterprise's intellectual property rights applications and grants increased significantly. Increasing the amount of intellectual property directly reflects the technical knowledge, and extensive use of the technology and promote the accelerated innovation process. Therefore, the use of intellectual property rights trust model of technological innovation to form a virtuous cycle, to promote the development of Chinese economy.
However, the intellectual property Chinese trusteeship system is still in the initial stage of development, there are still imperfect system design, operation efficiency is low, the channel is not smooth and other aspects of the problem. Firstly, the development of hosting services are the external resistance of three aspects: first, the large number of small and medium enterprises managed service adaptability is obviously insufficient. More than 70% of the enterprises China for small and medium-sized enterprises, small and medium enterprises in the economic capacity, has a greater advantage of intellectual property of power conversion and other aspects, the consciousness of intellectual property protection and demand are not strong enough, this is the biggest challenge of intellectual property trust in China's development in the future; second, the government policy and not providing adequate support the lack of corresponding laws and regulations, the development of this system, resulting in intellectual property managed service industry access threshold is too low, managed service providers uneven quality of service is not. Stability; third, the serious information asymmetry between managed service providers and hosting clients, managed service providers and service capability, service level and service quality can not directly show hosting customers, resulting in the existence of huge credit barriers between institutions and enterprises to provide customers managed hosting services. Secondly, from the internal hosting service agencies location, hosting services the role of self managed services, there are a lot of problems to be solved in terms of hosting service content design, which makes a large number of managed services at this stage can not fully meet the needs of customers.
The author attempts to study according to the current situation of intellectual property Chinese China hosting services in the development of the bottleneck and try to put forward some suggestions, in order to promote the smooth implementation of intellectual property system in China managed. I think we can learn from Mr Jun, Wu Guisheng put forward the "three spiral" concept, from the strengthening of the relevant system to improve the service ability construction, custodian, channel and other aspects of reform and improve, expand government managed services, hosting services, the three parties managed enterprise customers together, cooperate with each other to guide the China intellectual property managed successfully.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 盛輝;;企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新過程中的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)分析[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2012年03期

2 徐玨;于麗英;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群成長中的官產(chǎn)學(xué)三重螺旋關(guān)系演變分析[J];科技管理研究;2010年11期

3 蘇竣;姚志峰;;孵化器的孵化——三螺旋理論的解釋[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2007年03期

4 曹霞;喻登科;劉希宋;;科技成果轉(zhuǎn)化知識管理與支撐體系的耦合互動模式與路徑[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2010年02期

5 陳士俊;柳洲;;產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作的“鉆石琥珀模型”及其啟示[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2008年02期

6 孫敬水;論我國企業(yè)托管的現(xiàn)狀、問題及規(guī)范思路[J];南開經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1997年02期

7 程驕杰;趙文華;;產(chǎn)學(xué)研結(jié)合技術(shù)創(chuàng)新鏈的主體要素、問題及對策辨析[J];上海管理科學(xué);2011年01期

8 楊震寧;李東紅;;政府監(jiān)管,鰻魚效應(yīng)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)管理:企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的提升[J];中國管理科學(xué);2010年06期

，

本文編號：1493253