發(fā)布時間：2018-01-31 19:10

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 多邊貿(mào)易體制 區(qū)域貿(mào)易 馬克思主義公平正義　出處：《武漢工程大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：自WTO成立至今，多邊貿(mào)易體制對各國經(jīng)貿(mào)往來帶來了深遠與廣泛的影響，，在國際間擁有極大的影響力，為世界上100多個國家提供了多邊貿(mào)易、談判及解決爭端的舞臺與渠道，其范圍囊括貨物、服務(wù)、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)、國際投資及環(huán)境保護等領(lǐng)域。隨著全球經(jīng)濟的不斷發(fā)展，知識經(jīng)濟與服務(wù)經(jīng)濟日趨成熟，WTO所涉及的范圍日益擴展，不僅推動經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易的發(fā)展，同時也推動各國法律、經(jīng)濟、政治體制的變革與發(fā)展。 多邊貿(mào)易體制作為當代最受關(guān)注的貿(mào)易體制，對于推動貿(mào)易全球化進程做出了巨大的貢獻。但隨著世界經(jīng)濟、政治格局的改變，其原有的制度漸漸不再適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的需要，而發(fā)展中國家與發(fā)達國家間日漸增多的貿(mào)易摩擦，以及對于國際貿(mào)易公平的不同訴求，使得現(xiàn)有的多邊貿(mào)易體制亟待改善。 多邊貿(mào)易體制自從其成立之初就旨在推進全球范圍內(nèi)的貿(mào)易自由化與公平化，但是由于這套體制的制定主體是發(fā)達國家，而發(fā)達國家對于整個制度是設(shè)立是從其自身利益角度所出發(fā)的，這就使得多邊貿(mào)易體制從其根本上來說是偏向于發(fā)達國家的。而具有偏頗性的制度體系使得其在今后的發(fā)展歷程中勢必無法從公平公正的角度推動全球貿(mào)易的公平化進程。按照馬克思主義公平正義理論，對于不同階級來說對于公平的定義并不相同。因此處于弱勢地位的發(fā)展中國家企圖通過現(xiàn)有的多邊貿(mào)易體制實現(xiàn)公平的世界貿(mào)易存在著巨大的困難與阻礙，唯有對現(xiàn)存的多邊體制進行相應(yīng)的改善與改進，并通過發(fā)展中國家自身的不斷努力與爭取，才有可能在未來的貿(mào)易發(fā)展中實現(xiàn)相對的公平。 本文從馬克思主義公平正義視角，對當前多邊貿(mào)易體制下的公平性及處于不同國家、不同社會環(huán)境人們的公平觀，進行了剖析與研究，通過辯證的視角看待公平這個原本就具有主觀性的問題。同時，對現(xiàn)今多邊貿(mào)易體制下所存在的不公平現(xiàn)象及產(chǎn)生原因進行了研究與分析，深刻、系統(tǒng)的研究了不公平情況產(chǎn)生的根源，并就此提出了自己的觀點與建議，以期為實現(xiàn)真正的公平、正義提供有建設(shè)性的幫助與意見。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of the WTO, the multilateral trading system has brought profound and extensive influence to the economic and trade exchanges of various countries, and has a great influence in the international community, providing multilateral trade for more than 100 countries in the world. The stage and channel of negotiation and settlement of disputes, whose scope covers the fields of goods, services, intellectual property, international investment and environmental protection, etc. With the development of the global economy, the knowledge economy and service economy are maturing day by day. The scope of WTO is expanding day by day, which not only promotes the development of economy and trade, but also promotes the reform and development of law, economy and political system of every country. As the most concerned trade system, the multilateral trading system has made great contributions to the process of promoting the globalization of trade, but with the change of the world economy and political pattern. Its original system gradually no longer adapt to the needs of economic development, and the increasing trade friction between developing countries and developed countries, as well as the different demands for international trade equity. The existing multilateral trading system needs to be improved. Since its inception, the multilateral trading system has been aimed at promoting global trade liberalization and equity, but because the main body of the system is developed countries. The developed countries set up the whole system from the perspective of their own interests. This makes the multilateral trading system fundamentally biased towards the developed countries, while the biased system makes it impossible to promote global trade from a fair and just perspective in the course of its future development. According to Marxist theory of fairness and justice. For different classes, the definition of equity is not the same. Therefore, there are great difficulties and obstacles in the weak developing countries trying to achieve fair world trade through the existing multilateral trading system. Only through the corresponding improvement and improvement of the existing multilateral system, and through the continuous efforts and efforts of the developing countries themselves, will it be possible to achieve relative fairness in the future trade development. From the perspective of Marxist fairness and justice, this paper analyzes and studies the fairness of the current multilateral trading system and the fairness of people in different countries and different social environments. At the same time, the author makes a deep research and analysis on the unfair phenomenon and its causes under the current multilateral trading system. This paper systematically studies the root causes of the unfair situation, and puts forward its own views and suggestions in order to provide constructive help and advice for the realization of real fairness and justice.
【學位授予單位】：武漢工程大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F741

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張淑靜;東擴對歐盟外貿(mào)的影響[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2005年11期

2 易善武;;歐洲一體化中國家主權(quán)讓渡現(xiàn)象和特征研究[J];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè);2006年03期

3 谷口安平;胡加祥;尹楠楠;;從程序角度看WTO的爭端解決[J];比較法研究;2011年01期

4 傅林涌;歐盟東擴中歐補償談判的法律依據(jù)[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2004年09期

5 孟國碧;;論優(yōu)惠性貨物原產(chǎn)地規(guī)則的雙刃劍效應(yīng)——兼及中國的實踐[J];河北法學;2009年04期

6 李植,王鳳翔;建立區(qū)域共同市場的理論與實踐[J];環(huán)渤海經(jīng)濟w

本文編號：1479789