發(fā)布時間：2018-01-27 14:09

  本文關鍵詞： 信賴利益保護原則 學術史 司法判例 政府公信力　出處：《浙江工商大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：“信賴利益保護原則”于2000年被理論界正式引入中國大陸行政法體系,經(jīng)過14年的發(fā)展,其已經(jīng)成為大陸行政法不可或缺的重要構(gòu)成要素。在其生成過程中,學理與實踐構(gòu)成了其生成的兩條脈絡。2005年以前,作為構(gòu)建這一體系的主要動力,學理脈絡通過比較法引入,建構(gòu)了基本的話語結(jié)構(gòu)。而2005年前后,立足于中國本土的實踐脈絡,通過立法與司法審判,建立了與學理脈絡不同的,以“保障政府公信力”為基點的多樣性信賴利益保護框架,成為后一時期信賴利益保護原則生成的決定要素。結(jié)合學理與實踐,展望未來,我們認為,在未來的發(fā)展中,應當立足于國情,以保障政府公信力為基點,建構(gòu)以案件類型為基礎的綜合普遍性與特殊性的中國信賴利益保護原則。具體而言： 第一部分通過簡單梳理信賴利益保護原則在中國行政法理論與實踐層面的具體樣態(tài),發(fā)現(xiàn)信賴利益保護原則已經(jīng)開始了其中國化的過程,但是這一過程并未完成的簡單結(jié)論,并提出借助探索其生成歷史的方式進行追本溯源,還原其生成過程中的諸多要素,從而對其現(xiàn)狀進行界定。 第二部分,對于2000年前后的相關理論與實踐的分析,得出2000年可以被視為中國行政法信賴利益保護原則生成的基點,以何海波教授為代表的研究者們通過三篇文章,為信賴利益保護原則的中國化構(gòu)建了一個較高層次的起點,而這一階段,該原則尚未被應用于實踐。 第三部分,闡述原點時期至2005年“益民公司案”這一階段該原則的中國化發(fā)展徑路,主要通過三方面進行論述：一,對理論層面之信賴利益保護原則,誠信原則和合法預期保護原則進行解析；二,對這一階段的代表性立法,如《行政許可法》進行分析；三,對于具有代表性的“益民公司案”和“洋浦大源公司案”進行分析,從而得出結(jié)論：該原則在這一階段主要基于理論建構(gòu),立法與司法實踐助力相對較少,但是這些不多的實踐已開始反映出其與理論模型的不同。 第四部分,分析從“益民公司案”至2012年前后最高人民法院公布“吳小琴案”等“五案”這一階段中的歷史演進。通過理論比較與地方案例的分析,得出這一階段的基本樣態(tài)：理論框架穩(wěn)定,但是關于適用范圍,歷史源流等方面依然存在較大爭議,合法預期開始代替誠信原則成為主要的相關原則。而以地方司法實踐為代表的法院系統(tǒng)開始對這一原則進行自主創(chuàng)新,具體表現(xiàn)為：不斷拓展其適用領域,尤以知識產(chǎn)權領域為最；出現(xiàn)五種主要的適用徑路；一些共識逐漸形成：如過錯等；而最高人民法院公布的具有節(jié)點意義的“五案”,雖然具體適用徑路也有所不同,但是其與理論模型的差別已經(jīng)顯而易見：強調(diào)信賴基礎作用下的相對人利益的保護,而這一徑路的基礎便是對于政府公信力的強調(diào)。這一階段,司法實踐已經(jīng)逐步取代理論界,成為這一原則中國化主要動力。 第五部分,基于前述部分,對于該原則中國化生成歷史進行相應反省,得出部分理論共識逐步形成但整體仍缺乏本土化關懷；司法實踐積極填補空白,但是卻有“徙木立信”一般的泛化憂慮的基本結(jié)論。在此反省基礎上,提出立足于中國國情進行建設,以政府公信力保障為基點,建立普遍化與特殊化相結(jié)合的多元化適用模式的具體主張。
[Abstract]:"The principle of reliance interest protection in 2000 was formally introduced, the theory China administrative law system, after 14 years of development, it has become an important indispensable elements of administrative law in mainland. In the production process, the theory and practice of the two lines.2005 years ago, as the main force to construct the A system of the academic context introduced by the comparative method, construct the discourse structure. And after 2005, based on Chinese local practical context, through legislative and judicial trial is established with different academic context, to guarantee the credibility of the government" is the basis of the diversity of the trust benefit protection framework, be decided after a period of the principle of reliance interest protection generated elements. Combining theory and practice, in the future, we believe that in the future, should be based on national conditions, in order to ensure the credibility of the government as the starting point, Construction of the principle of protection of China's trust interests based on the type of case, which is comprehensive universality and particularity.
The first part by reviewing the principle of protection of reliance on the specific form of China administrative law theory and practice, found that the principle of reliance interest protection has already begun the process of Chinese, but this process has not completed the simple conclusion, and put forward by exploring the history of a trace to its source, restores its formation factors in the process, and thus to define the status quo.
The second part, the analysis of related theory and practice before and after 2000, the 2000 can be regarded as the basis of the principle of generation to protect the interests of the trust Chinese, researchers represented by Professor He Haibo, who by three articles, constructed the starting point for a higher level of trust for the principle of protecting the interests of the Chinese, and this a stage, the principle has not been applied in practice.
The third part expounds the origin of this stage period to 2005 "Yimin's case" the principle of the Chinese development path, discussed mainly through three aspects: first, the theoretical level of the trust benefit protection principle, the principle of good faith and the principle of protection of legitimate expectations of two, the representative; the stage of legislation such as the "administrative licensing law > analysis; three, the representative of the" Yimin company case "and" Yangpu source company case "analysis, thus draws the conclusion: the principle in this stage is mainly based on the theory, legislation and judicial practice of power is relatively small, but these little practice have begun to reflect it is different from the theoretical model.
The fourth part, analysis of historical evolution in this period from "Yimin's case" to 2012 before and after the Supreme People's Court promulgated the "Wu Xiaoqin case" and "five case". Through the analysis of the theory of comparative and case, draw the basic state of this stage: a theoretical framework for stability, but is about the scope of history and still controversial, legitimate expectations began to replace the principle of good faith principle. And become relevant to the local judicial practice of the court system to represent the beginning of independent innovation of this principle, the specific performance: expand the application fields, especially in the field of intellectual property is the most; there are five main types of suitable size the road; some consensus gradually formed such as: fault; the Supreme People's Court published with the node of the "Five" case, although the specific path is different, but the theory The difference is obviously model: the protection of the reliance foundation under the action of the relative emphasis on the interests of the people, and this is the basic path way to emphasise the credibility of the government. In this period, the judicial practice has gradually taken theorists, become the main driving force of this principle China.
The fifth part, based on the previous part, for the principle of Chinese formation history of the corresponding reflection, some theoretical consensus gradually formed but the overall localization is still a lack of concern; judicial practice to fill in the blanks, but "the conclusion resettlement wood Ericsson general concern. This generalization based on the basis of construction, put forward to China conditions, to guarantee the credibility of the government as the starting point, the establishment of universal and special combination of diversified application model of concrete proposals.

【學位授予單位】：浙江工商大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 朱蘇力;制度是如何形成的?——關于馬歇爾訴麥迪遜案的故事[J];比較法研究;1998年01期

2 石佑啟,王貴松;行政信賴保護之立法思考[J];當代法學;2004年03期

3 王錫鋅;;行政法上的正當期待保護原則述論[J];東方法學;2009年01期

4 曾堅;;信賴保護原則的實有功能及其實現(xiàn)[J];東方法學;2009年02期

5 余凌云;;政府信賴保護、正當期望和合法預期[J];廈門大學法律評論;2006年02期

6 李玉敏 ,陳志力 ,蔡靖;行政承諾案件的性質(zhì)及審理對象[J];法律適用;2003年12期

7 潘榮偉;政府誠信——行政法中的誠信原則[J];法商研究;2003年03期

8 莫于川,林鴻潮;論當代行政法上的信賴保護原則[J];法商研究;2004年05期

9 戚淵;試論我國行政法援引誠信原則之意義[J];法學;1993年04期

10 黃學賢;行政法中的信賴保護原則[J];法學;2002年05期

，

本文編號：1468650