本文關(guān)鍵詞： 孤兒作品 合理使用 強(qiáng)制許可　出處：《安徽大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：所謂孤兒作品,指仍然處于著作權(quán)法所保護(hù)的期限內(nèi),但由于作者或作品的原件所有人下落不明,或者雖然知曉其聯(lián)系方式卻聯(lián)系不到的作品�，F(xiàn)實(shí)生活中存在著大量的孤兒作品,這些作品如何得以合理有效的使用是值得我們法學(xué)專業(yè)進(jìn)行研究的重要問題之一。孤兒作品使用與否,如何進(jìn)行使用,如何平衡使用者與作者或作品的原件所有人之間的利益,權(quán)衡公共利益與私人利益等問題的研究尤為重要。探究孤兒作品的著作權(quán)問題首先必須研究問題產(chǎn)生原因,才能處理好這一問題。筆者認(rèn)為造成大量孤兒作品存在的最重要的原因之一是現(xiàn)行國際社會(huì)所通行的著作權(quán)法的自動(dòng)保護(hù)原則,其次是著作權(quán)法上的署名權(quán)的自由性,中華民族的不注重私權(quán)保護(hù)的歷史傳統(tǒng)習(xí)慣,科技迅速發(fā)展所帶來的新的傳播方式引發(fā)的時(shí)代問題,加上目前當(dāng)今所通行于世界的伯爾尼公約所規(guī)定的長達(dá)半個(gè)世紀(jì)的漫長的著作權(quán)法保護(hù)期限等因素的共同影響下導(dǎo)致了孤兒作品數(shù)量長期居高不下。 孤兒作品的著作權(quán)問題早就已經(jīng)引起了一些發(fā)達(dá)國家的關(guān)注重視。不只是歐美等國家,我國的鄰國韓國,日本都先于中國關(guān)注這一問題,就連我國的臺(tái)灣地區(qū)和香港地區(qū)也已經(jīng)出臺(tái)了相關(guān)法律法規(guī)予以規(guī)制。孤兒作品的著作權(quán)問題關(guān)系到作者的權(quán)利能否得到最佳的保障,關(guān)系到使用者的使用權(quán)和利益能否得到合理地保護(hù),關(guān)系到社會(huì)文化資源能否得到有效地利用,關(guān)系到知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法的發(fā)展進(jìn)程,是不容忽視的重要問題,但是我國目前沒有明確的法律規(guī)定,針對這一問題存在的重要性,我們必須加以重視。 本文闡述孤兒作品的概念分類、產(chǎn)生原因,當(dāng)前各個(gè)國家和地區(qū)的法律法規(guī)制度,在此基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合本國實(shí)際國情,提出切實(shí)有效的我國的著作權(quán)法的立法建議,以期做到更好地解決孤兒作品的著作權(quán)問題,平衡知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的公共領(lǐng)域與私人領(lǐng)域,最佳保護(hù)作者的基礎(chǔ)上合理使用作品,改變資源白白浪費(fèi)的現(xiàn)象,從而促進(jìn)我國社會(huì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的繁榮發(fā)展。谷歌侵權(quán)案例的問題以及生活中出現(xiàn)的一系列的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題反駁了一些反對對此項(xiàng)問題進(jìn)行研究的學(xué)者的觀點(diǎn),說明研究的必要性。 目前國外主要有許可模式、登記模式、延伸性集體管理模式、時(shí)效取得制度、技術(shù)保護(hù)措施、公司化經(jīng)營模式這幾種解決孤兒作品著作權(quán)問題的方案。每種方式各有利弊,借鑒和參考國外的這些先進(jìn)的法律法規(guī)和施行方案,并對這些方案加以歸納,分析比較每種方案各自的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)。本文在分析比較這些不同解決方案的基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合中國當(dāng)今的社會(huì)實(shí)際,作出具體的立法建議,以期合法合理合情地解決孤兒作品的著作權(quán)問題。
[Abstract]:The so-called orphan works, refers to the copyright law is still in the protection of the period of time, but due to the author or the original owner of the work is missing. Or even though they know their contact information but can not contact the works. In real life there are a large number of orphans works. How to use these works reasonably and effectively is one of the important problems worthy of our study of law major. Whether the orphan works are used or not, how to use them. How to balance the interests of the user with the author or owner of the original. It is particularly important to study the balance between public and private interests. To explore the copyright of orphan works, we must first study the causes of the problem. The author believes that one of the most important reasons for the existence of a large number of orphan works is the principle of automatic protection of copyright law which is adopted by the international community. The second is the freedom of the authorship in the copyright law, the historical tradition of the Chinese nation not paying attention to the protection of private rights, and the problems of the times caused by the rapid development of science and technology. In addition, under the influence of the long copyright protection period of half a century stipulated by the Berne Convention, which is currently used in the world today, the number of orphans' works has remained high for a long time. The issue of the copyright of orphan works has long attracted the attention of some developed countries. Not only Europe and the United States, China's neighboring countries, South Korea, Japan are concerned about this issue before China. Even Taiwan and Hong Kong have issued laws and regulations to regulate it. The copyright of orphan works is related to whether the author's rights can be best protected. Related to the user's right to use and interests can be reasonably protected, related to the social and cultural resources can be effectively used, related to the development of intellectual property law, is an important issue that can not be ignored. However, there is no clear legal regulation in our country at present, so we must pay attention to the importance of this problem. This paper describes the concept of orphan works classification, causes, the current laws and regulations of various countries and regions, on the basis of this combined with the actual national conditions. In order to better solve the copyright problem of orphan works and balance the public and private fields of intellectual property rights, this paper puts forward some effective legislative suggestions on copyright law of our country. The best protection of the author on the basis of the rational use of the work, change the phenomenon of waste of resources. In order to promote the prosperity and development of China's social and cultural industry. Google infringement cases and a series of practical problems in life refute the views of some scholars who oppose the research on this issue. Explain the necessity of research. At present, there are mainly licensing mode, registration mode, extended collective management model, prescription acquisition system, technical protection measures. Corporatization management model these several solutions to the copyright problem of orphan works. Each way has its advantages and disadvantages, draw lessons from and refer to these advanced foreign laws and regulations and implementation plans, and sum up these plans. This paper analyzes and compares the advantages and disadvantages of each scheme. Based on the analysis and comparison of these different solutions, this paper makes specific legislative suggestions in combination with the current social situation in China. In order to legally and reasonably solve the problem of copyright of orphan works.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周艷敏;宋慧獻(xiàn);;版權(quán)制度下的“孤兒作品”問題[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2009年06期

2 黃旭春;;淺析美國2008年孤兒作品議案[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年07期

3 梁志文;;著作權(quán)延伸性集體許可制度的移植與創(chuàng)制[J];法學(xué);2012年08期

4 欽媛;;《著作權(quán)法》(修改草案)有關(guān)音樂條款的法理分析與修改建議[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2012年11期

5 文杰;;我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)“著作權(quán)集體管理團(tuán)體條例”評介及其啟示[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2012年06期

6 張今;數(shù)字環(huán)境下恢復(fù)著作權(quán)利益平衡的基本思路[J];科技與法律;2004年04期

7 郭鵬;;我國技術(shù)措施保護(hù)及其例外的法律構(gòu)架完善——對《著作權(quán)法修改草案》的不修改質(zhì)疑[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年10期

8 張明杰;張延偉;;哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的問題與對策[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)管理與評論;2007年02期

9 張陽;;論制作、出售假冒他人署名作品行為的侵權(quán)性質(zhì)——兼論署名權(quán)[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2011年S8期

10 馬海群;高思靜;;孤兒作品的版權(quán)困境及解決路徑[J];圖書情報(bào)工作;2011年17期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孟祥娟;版權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定與法律救濟(jì)[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 張鵬;論侵犯著作權(quán)罪[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2005年

2 王益平;數(shù)字技術(shù)和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下作者精神權(quán)利比較研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

3 李兆閣;冒名行為民事責(zé)任研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

4 魏洋;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)集體管理許可制度的探究[D];西南大學(xué);2012年

5 陳雪娜;孤兒作品利用的法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1461172