本文關(guān)鍵詞： 信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán) 司法適用 發(fā)行權(quán)　出處：《蘇州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：技術(shù)的變遷與法律觀念的發(fā)展，都會(huì)促進(jìn)著作權(quán)權(quán)利內(nèi)容制度的迅速變更。為了適應(yīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)高速發(fā)展的需要，國(guó)際公約與國(guó)外發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家都通過(guò)立法將網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為納入著作權(quán)法保護(hù)體系，我國(guó)在2001年修訂《著作權(quán)法》中也新增了一項(xiàng)著作權(quán)人的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)。與之相應(yīng)，作品網(wǎng)上傳播愈來(lái)愈盛行，信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的司法適用也逐漸成為當(dāng)前知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)領(lǐng)域中的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。本文有三個(gè)章節(jié)組成： 第一章為信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的概述。該部分首先介紹了信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)產(chǎn)生的背景。然后簡(jiǎn)述了各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)立法的三種方式，即美國(guó)、澳大利亞和歐盟為代表。接著分析了中國(guó)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播立法方式的選擇。最后從法律條文上對(duì)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)作了初步的解讀。 第二章為信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)司法適用中的問(wèn)題。這一章又可分為三節(jié)，每一節(jié)開頭都一組案例引出信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)在司法實(shí)踐之中引發(fā)的爭(zhēng)議，接著闡述反映出的問(wèn)題和問(wèn)題的成因，并對(duì)案例中的“非交互式”網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播、網(wǎng)吧局域網(wǎng)內(nèi)傳播作品的行為性質(zhì)以及信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)與發(fā)行權(quán)沖突進(jìn)行了探討。 第三章為信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的不足和第三次《著作權(quán)法》修改。本章旨在三組案例反映出問(wèn)題的基礎(chǔ)上，，總結(jié)歸納我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)立法的不足，最后結(jié)合《著作權(quán)法》第三次修改之際，對(duì)草案中涉及網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的內(nèi)容作梳理，并給出自己的評(píng)價(jià)。
[Abstract]:The change of technology and the development of legal concept will promote the rapid change of copyright content system in order to meet the needs of the rapid development of network technology. Both international conventions and developed countries have adopted legislation to bring the behavior of network communication into the protection system of copyright law. In 2001, the copyright Law was amended in our country, and a new property rights information dissemination right of copyright owners was added. Accordingly, the online dissemination of works became more and more popular. The judicial application of information network communication right has gradually become a hot issue in the field of intellectual property protection. There are three chapters in this paper: The first chapter is an overview of the information network communication right. This part first introduces the background of the information network communication right, and then briefly describes the three ways of national legislation, that is, the United States. Australia and the European Union are the representatives. Then it analyzes the choice of the legislative mode of network communication in China. Finally, it makes a preliminary interpretation of the right of information network communication from the legal provisions. The second chapter is the problem of the judicial application of information network communication right. This chapter can be divided into three sections, each section begins with a group of cases to elicit the controversy caused by the information network communication right in the judicial practice. Then the paper expounds the problems reflected and the causes of the problems, and the "non-interactive" network communication in the case. This paper probes into the behavior nature of communication works in Internet cafes and the conflict between the right of information dissemination and the right of distribution. The third chapter is the deficiency of information network communication right and the third revision of copyright Law. This chapter aims to sum up the shortcomings of China's network communication right legislation on the basis of three groups of cases reflecting the problems. Finally, combining with the third revision of copyright Law, this paper combs the contents of the draft concerning the right of network communication, and gives its own evaluation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 王遷;;我國(guó)《著作權(quán)法》中“廣播權(quán)”與“信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)”的重構(gòu)[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年09期

2 焦和平;;論我國(guó)《著作權(quán)法》上“信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)”的完善——以“非交互式”網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為侵權(quán)認(rèn)定為視角[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年06期

3 吳漢東;王毅;;著作權(quán)客體論[J];中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1990年04期

4 梅術(shù)文;;我國(guó)著作權(quán)法上的傳播權(quán)整合[J];法學(xué);2010年09期

5 左玉茹;;《著作權(quán)法》第三次修改草案述評(píng)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年04期

6 焦和平;;三網(wǎng)融合下廣播權(quán)與信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的重構(gòu)——兼析《著作權(quán)法(修改草案)》前兩稿的相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2013年01期

7 芮松艷;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的理解適用與第三次《著作權(quán)法》修改 以國(guó)際公約及司法實(shí)踐為視角[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年Z1期

8 左玉茹;侯磊;盧文濤;盧鼎亮;周春慧;;《著作權(quán)法》修改草案第二稿述評(píng)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年07期

9 顧威豪;;非交互式網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為的規(guī)制 淺談《著作權(quán)法修改草案》中擴(kuò)張“信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)”的必要性[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年12期

10 王遷;;論著作權(quán)法中“發(fā)行”行為的界定——兼評(píng)“全球首宗BT刑事犯罪案”[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

本文編號(hào)：1454856