發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-18 21:22

【摘要】：本文首先論述了行政回避的理論概括,并在此基礎(chǔ)上深入剖析了行政回避制度的特征和分類(lèi)。闡述我國(guó)行政回避制度現(xiàn)狀,研究我國(guó)行政回避制度存在問(wèn)題的原因。最后,針對(duì)上述原因提出促進(jìn)我國(guó)行政回避制度的對(duì)策。全文共分為四章:第一章:行政回避制度的理論基礎(chǔ)一共包括三部分:行政回避制度的概況和行政回避制度的內(nèi)涵。第一部分主要闡述行政回避的概況,任何制度的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展都基于一定的理論基礎(chǔ);沒(méi)有理論基礎(chǔ)的支撐,制度就會(huì)成為無(wú)源之水,回避制度亦然。行政回避制度源于英國(guó)的“自然正義”原則和美國(guó)的“正當(dāng)程序”原則。而我國(guó)的依法行政更是行政回避制度發(fā)展的必然要求。第二、三部分分別論述行政回避制度的行政回避制度的特征和行政回避制度的分類(lèi)。第二章:我國(guó)行政回避制度目前存在的問(wèn)題,結(jié)合我國(guó)目前關(guān)于行政回避制度法律法規(guī)的規(guī)定,分析我國(guó)行政回避制度的當(dāng)前現(xiàn)狀,進(jìn)而總結(jié)出我國(guó)行政回避制度目前存在的問(wèn)題主要有:立法缺失、闡述模糊;回避事由不夠規(guī)范;現(xiàn)行規(guī)范過(guò)于分散;適用范圍過(guò)窄等六個(gè)問(wèn)題。第三章:我國(guó)行政回避制度存在問(wèn)題的原因分析,從上一章總結(jié)的我國(guó)行政回避的現(xiàn)狀分析造成這些問(wèn)題存在的原因,主要包括四個(gè)方面:我國(guó)特殊的社會(huì)環(huán)境、主體缺乏程序意識(shí)、相對(duì)人缺乏程序權(quán)利意識(shí)、回避缺乏監(jiān)督制度。第四章:促進(jìn)我國(guó)行政回避制度的對(duì)策。針對(duì)行政回避的主要法律缺陷,提出完善我國(guó)行政回避制度的措施,比如:明確規(guī)定行政回避制度的事由、明確回避的具體情形,擴(kuò)大回避主體范圍、完善程序性規(guī)定、明確法律后果、制定專(zhuān)門(mén)的法規(guī)、建立監(jiān)督機(jī)制、完善救濟(jì)機(jī)制、提高執(zhí)法人員自身素質(zhì)、增加相對(duì)人權(quán)利意識(shí)、明確權(quán)利相對(duì)人的保護(hù)程序、確立司法回避制度。
[Abstract]:This paper first discusses the theory of administrative avoidance, and analyzes the characteristics and classification of the administrative avoidance system. This paper expounds the present situation of China's administrative avoidance system, and studies the reasons of the problems in China's administrative avoidance system. Finally, the countermeasures of promoting China's administrative avoidance system are put forward for the above reasons. The full text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter: the theoretical basis of the administrative avoidance system consists of three parts: the general situation of the administrative avoidance system and the connotation of the administrative avoidance system. The first part mainly expounds the general situation of the administrative avoidance, and the generation and development of any system is based on a certain theoretical foundation. Without the support of the theoretical foundation, the system becomes the passive water and the avoidance system. The administrative avoidance system is derived from the British "natural justice" principle and the American "due process" principle. The administration by law in our country is the inevitable requirement of the development of the administrative avoidance system. The second part and the third part discuss the characteristics of the administrative avoidance system and the classification of the administrative avoidance system, respectively. The second chapter: the present problems of China's administrative avoidance system, in connection with the current situation of China's administrative avoidance system in the light of the present situation of China's administrative avoidance system, and then summarizes the existing problems in China's administrative avoidance system: the lack of legislation, The reasons for the avoidance are not enough, the current standard is too decentralized, and the scope of application is too narrow. The third chapter: the reason analysis of the problems of China's administrative avoidance system, the present situation of China's administrative avoidance, which is summarized in the last chapter, causes these problems to exist, mainly including four aspects: the special social environment of our country, the main body lacks the process consciousness, The relative people lack the consciousness of program right and avoid the lack of supervision system. The fourth chapter: to promote the countermeasure of China's administrative avoidance system. In the light of the main legal defects of the administrative avoidance, the paper puts forward the measures to improve the administrative avoidance system in China, for example, to specify the cause of the administrative avoidance system, to make clear the specific situation of the avoidance, to expand the scope of the main body, to perfect the procedural rules, to define the legal consequences, and to formulate specific regulations. Establish the supervision mechanism, improve the relief mechanism, improve the self-quality of the law enforcement personnel, increase the relative human rights consciousness, clarify the protection procedure of the relative person, and establish the judicial avoidance system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳保中;;論我國(guó)行政回避法律制度[J];法治論叢(上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2005年06期

2 周世磊;;完善我國(guó)行政回避制度的理性思考[J];傳承;2008年22期

3 李宜霖;;淺議我國(guó)行政回避制度的完善[J];商丘師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年08期

4 鐘琦;;中國(guó)行政回避制度的法律缺陷及完善[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2012年16期

5 武春玲;我國(guó)行政回避制度之檢視[J];中北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年05期

6 邵海卿;;行政回避制度初探[J];中國(guó)纖檢;2006年01期

7 陳保中;;行政回避:制度缺陷及其法律完善[J];上海行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期

8 蔣君偉;;行政回避制度若干理論問(wèn)題研究[J];昆明師范高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

9 魯巖;翁迎曉;;我國(guó)行政回避若干問(wèn)題探究[J];湖北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年10期

10 蘇慶原;鐘穗青;;關(guān)于行政回避制度的法律思考[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2009年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 陳光中;行政回避的難點(diǎn)是公務(wù)回避[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 李進(jìn)濤;行政回避制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

2 謝皇萱;行政回避制度法律研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

3 李霄飛;依法行政視野下行政回避制度研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2017年

4 祁亮;行政回避制度研究[D];山西大學(xué);2006年

5 蔣君偉;論行政程序中的回避制度[D];蘇州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2501800