【摘要】：土地復(fù)墾在保護(hù)和補(bǔ)充耕地資源,保障糧食安全和生態(tài)安全,堅(jiān)守18億畝耕地紅線等方面發(fā)揮了重要作用。土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管則是落實(shí)最嚴(yán)格的耕地保護(hù)制度和最嚴(yán)格的節(jié)約用地制度的有力抓手。厘清土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系是明確土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)、完善監(jiān)管的法律規(guī)范、加強(qiáng)監(jiān)管手段和完備監(jiān)管技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的有效路徑。有利于促進(jìn)土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律規(guī)范從靜態(tài)向動(dòng)態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)化,實(shí)現(xiàn)土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管工作應(yīng)有的法律秩序。探究土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系既能拓寬法律關(guān)系理論的研究范疇,又能為土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管活動(dòng)的切實(shí)開展提供必需的規(guī)范指引。近年來,我國土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管工作取得一定成效,但仍存在監(jiān)管主體分工合作少,責(zé)任不明確、土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管的責(zé)任不明晰、復(fù)墾義務(wù)不明確、缺乏健全的管理和執(zhí)法監(jiān)督體制等問題。結(jié)合法律關(guān)系理論探究土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管問題,是解決土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管發(fā)展困境的突破口。在實(shí)踐共同體的指引下有助于突破傳統(tǒng)法律關(guān)系理論研究的瓶頸,為科學(xué)構(gòu)建土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律規(guī)范提供更為現(xiàn)實(shí)化、具體化的路徑。實(shí)踐共同體成員在共同的目標(biāo)與利益的指引下形成的內(nèi)部彼此認(rèn)知、相互理解的共同體。“‘多層次參與’實(shí)踐共同體理念”通過劃分不同層次的參與形式來詮釋成員的職責(zé)和權(quán)利�！啊畡�(dòng)態(tài)平衡’實(shí)踐共同體理念”通過控制內(nèi)在要素的平衡穩(wěn)定來推動(dòng)實(shí)踐共同體的發(fā)展�？稍趯�(shí)踐共同體理論的指引下構(gòu)建土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管實(shí)踐共同體。在“‘多層次參與’實(shí)踐共同體理念”的指引下,通過詮釋土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系的構(gòu)成解決土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管實(shí)踐共同體的參與形式問題。在“‘動(dòng)態(tài)平衡’實(shí)踐共同體理念”的指引下,通過詮釋土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系的適用解決土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管實(shí)踐共同體的發(fā)展問題。本文運(yùn)用價(jià)值分析方法和規(guī)范分析方法對(duì)土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系展開研究。首先,價(jià)值分析方法主要運(yùn)用于兩個(gè)方面。一方面,基于法律關(guān)系相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)之價(jià)值分析方法。通過羅列評(píng)述法律關(guān)系諸學(xué)說,進(jìn)而導(dǎo)出土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系的概念及特征。另一方面,基于實(shí)踐共同體理論文獻(xiàn)之價(jià)值分析方法。在分析凝練實(shí)踐共同體基本內(nèi)涵的基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用“‘多層次參與’實(shí)踐共同體理念”指引土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系的主體、內(nèi)容和客體三者的涵義及其內(nèi)容。其次,規(guī)范分析方法主要運(yùn)用于“‘動(dòng)態(tài)平衡’實(shí)踐共同體理念”指引下的土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系的價(jià)值、立法整合、規(guī)范設(shè)定的適用。從平衡價(jià)值取向入手分析土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系的價(jià)值適用。從規(guī)范性法律文件系統(tǒng)化的視角分析土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系的立法整合適用。從法律規(guī)范的內(nèi)容設(shè)計(jì)方面分析土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管法律關(guān)系的規(guī)則設(shè)定適用。
[Abstract]:Land reclamation plays an important role in protecting and supplementing cultivated land resources, ensuring food security and ecological security, and sticking to the red line of 1.8 billion mu cultivated land. Land reclamation supervision is the most strict farmland protection system and the strictest land conservation system. To clarify the legal relationship of land reclamation supervision is an effective way to clarify the land reclamation supervision agencies, perfect the legal norms of supervision, strengthen the means of supervision and perfect the technical standards of supervision. It is beneficial to promote the legal norms of land reclamation supervision from static to dynamic, and to realize the legal order of land reclamation supervision. Exploring the legal relationship of land reclamation supervision can not only broaden the research scope of the legal relationship theory, but also provide the necessary normative guidance for the effective development of land reclamation supervision. In recent years, the supervision of land reclamation in our country has made some achievements, but there are still some problems, such as the less division of labor and cooperation, the unclear responsibility, the unclear responsibility of land reclamation supervision, and the unclear duty of reclamation. Lack of sound management and law enforcement supervision system and other issues. Combining with the theory of legal relation, it is a breakthrough to solve the dilemma of land reclamation supervision. Under the guidance of the community of practice, it is helpful to break through the bottleneck of the traditional legal relationship theory and provide a more realistic and concrete way for the scientific construction of the legal norms of land reclamation supervision. Under the guidance of common goals and interests, the members of the Community of practice form a community of mutual cognition and mutual understanding. The concept of "multi-level participation" interprets the duties and rights of members by dividing different levels of participation. The idea of "dynamic balance" promotes the development of practical community by controlling the balance and stability of internal elements. The practical community of land reclamation supervision can be constructed under the guidance of the theory of practical community. Under the guidance of the concept of "multi-level participation", the participation form of land reclamation supervision practice community is solved by interpreting the composition of the legal relationship of land reclamation supervision. Under the guidance of the idea of "dynamic balance", the development of practical community of land reclamation supervision is solved by interpreting the legal relationship of land reclamation supervision. This paper studies the legal relationship of land reclamation supervision with value analysis method and normative analysis method. First of all, the value analysis method is mainly applied in two aspects. On the one hand, the value analysis method based on the relevant documents of legal relationship. The concept and characteristics of the legal relationship of land reclamation supervision are derived by listing and commenting on the theories of legal relations. On the other hand, the value analysis method of theoretical literature based on practical community. Based on the analysis of the basic connotation of the condensed practice community, this paper uses the concept of "multi-level participation" to guide the subject, content and object of the legal relationship of land reclamation supervision. Secondly, the normative analysis method is mainly applied to the value of the legal relationship of land reclamation supervision under the guidance of "dynamic balance" practice Community concept, legislative integration and the application of norm setting. This paper analyzes the value application of the legal relationship of land reclamation supervision from the perspective of balanced value orientation. This paper analyzes the legislative integration and application of land reclamation supervision from the perspective of systematization of normative legal documents. From the aspect of content design of legal norms, this paper analyzes the rule setting and application of land reclamation supervision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱江;;法律關(guān)系“涉外性”判斷的新視閾[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2017年01期

2 翟翌;;行政特許法律關(guān)系新論[J];比較法研究;2016年05期

3 甄偉杰;;淺談法治宣傳教育的內(nèi)容[J];南方論刊;2016年04期

4 楊立新;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易法律關(guān)系構(gòu)造[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年02期

5 王利明;;以法律關(guān)系為主線構(gòu)建民法典總則體系[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)文摘;2016年01期

6 李國強(qiáng);;論農(nóng)地流轉(zhuǎn)中“三權(quán)分置”的法律關(guān)系[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2015年06期

7 朱廣新;;民事法律行為制度的反思與完善——以法律規(guī)范的邏輯合理性為中心[J];政治與法律;2015年10期

8 李茂榮;;實(shí)踐共同體概念的轉(zhuǎn)化與反思:基于文本的分析[J];教育學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2015年07期

9 趙宏;;法律關(guān)系取代行政行為的可能與困局[J];法學(xué)家;2015年03期

10 李永軍;;民法典總則的立法技術(shù)及由此決定的內(nèi)容思考[J];比較法研究;2015年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 朱虎;薩維尼法律關(guān)系理論研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 鐘謙益;論P(yáng)2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的內(nèi)外部法律關(guān)系及其監(jiān)管[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

2 戴蘇亮;論“引誘違約”法律關(guān)系雙重屬性的協(xié)調(diào)[D];中國政法大學(xué);2016年

3 陳曉暉;土地復(fù)墾合同管理研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2012年

4 姚瑞瑞;土地復(fù)墾監(jiān)管制度探索[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京);2012年

5 向f ;我國《土地復(fù)墾條例》中若干環(huán)境保護(hù)法律制度的研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2012年

6 管麗英;我國煤礦區(qū)土地復(fù)墾立法研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年

7 張樂;我國礦區(qū)土地復(fù)墾法律法規(guī)研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2010年

8 瞿飛飛;論利益的立法整合機(jī)制及其完善[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2222879