土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力探析
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-15 14:18
【摘要】：土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓問題牽涉到各方的巨大利益,受到了法學(xué)理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界的積極關(guān)注。為了能夠妥善解決這一問題,學(xué)者們提出了許多理論上的建議,各地也進(jìn)行了很多實(shí)踐上的探索。本文主要是從合同效力的視角,研究承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓問題。也就是說,在通過整理大量司法判決書的基礎(chǔ)上,提煉出了影響轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的若干強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范,從法學(xué)理論上進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的分析論證,表明了自己的觀點(diǎn),肯定了承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓行為。 全文一共分為五個(gè)部分,第一部分簡單介紹了司法判決書的整理情況,詳細(xì)分析了法院在裁判轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力方面的分歧,最后引出了所要分析的具體問題。第二部分從理論、立法兩個(gè)方面,探討了強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范與轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的關(guān)系。哪些規(guī)范屬于強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范,哪些強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范能夠影響合同的效力,理論上的研究不斷深入,法律上的規(guī)定也不斷的發(fā)生變化。在該部分的最后,對這兩方面探索進(jìn)行了分析和總結(jié),提出了要從規(guī)范目的和規(guī)范利益兩個(gè)方面,判斷強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范是否影響合同的效力。 第三部分是全文的重點(diǎn)。我們以司法案例為切入點(diǎn),以具體的條文規(guī)定為分析對象,綜合考量《農(nóng)村土地承包法》的規(guī)范性質(zhì)和規(guī)范利益,通過價(jià)值判斷和利益衡量,從四個(gè)方面論證了強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范與轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的關(guān)系。第一,論述了發(fā)包方同意與轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的關(guān)系。法律雖然規(guī)定土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓要經(jīng)發(fā)包方同意,但是做出這一規(guī)定的理由并不充分。第二,討論了主體資格與轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的關(guān)系。對轉(zhuǎn)讓方與受讓方的主體資格進(jìn)行限制,不能影響合同的效力,并且需要反思這一立法目的,是否適應(yīng)法政策和公共政策的變化；第三,論述了土地性質(zhì)和用途與轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力。土地性質(zhì)和用途是絕對禁止性的規(guī)定,一旦違反,轉(zhuǎn)讓合同就無效,并且還要承擔(dān)公法上的處罰；第四,討論了書面形式與轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力。土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓牽涉到巨大的利益,而法定的書面形式是最基本的要求,否則會影響轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力；基于社會現(xiàn)實(shí)的考慮,也要區(qū)別對待,可以通過合同的履行補(bǔ)正形式的瑕疵。 第四部分,從立法和司法上提出了一些完善的建議。從理論上,進(jìn)一步的論證了限制承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓是不符合社會發(fā)展變化的；在立法上提出了一些完善的建議；最后,論述了法院在裁判案件時(shí)應(yīng)選擇什么樣的解釋方法,從而使具體的個(gè)案得到公平正義的解決。第五部分從宏觀的角度對全文進(jìn)行了總結(jié),提出了最后的研究結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:The transfer of land contractual management right involves the great interests of all parties and has been actively concerned by the legal theorists and practitioners. In order to solve this problem properly, scholars have put forward many theoretical suggestions, and many practical explorations have been carried out in various places. This paper mainly studies the transfer of contractual management right from the perspective of contract effectiveness. That is to say, on the basis of sorting out a large number of judicial judgments, some mandatory norms affecting the effectiveness of transfer contracts have been refined, and detailed analysis and argumentation have been carried out from the legal theory, showing their own views. Confirmed the transfer of contractual management rights behavior. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part briefly introduces the arrangement of judicial judgments, analyzes in detail the differences in the validity of the transfer contract, and finally leads to the specific problems to be analyzed. The second part discusses the relationship between the mandatory norms and the validity of the transfer contract from the aspects of theory and legislation. Which norms belong to mandatory norms and which mandatory norms can affect the effectiveness of contracts, the theoretical study continues to deepen, the legal provisions are constantly changing. At the end of this part, the author analyzes and summarizes the two aspects, and puts forward that it is necessary to judge whether the mandatory norms affect the effectiveness of the contract from two aspects: the purpose of the norm and the interests of the norm. The third part is the focus of the paper. We take the judicial cases as the starting point, take the specific provisions as the analysis object, synthetically consider the normative nature and normative interests of the Rural Land contract Law, and measure the value and interests through the value judgment. The relationship between the mandatory norms and the validity of the transfer contract is demonstrated from four aspects. First, it discusses the relationship between the agreement of the issuing party and the validity of the contract of assignment. Although the law stipulates that the transfer of the land contractual management right is subject to the consent of the contracting party, the reasons for making this provision are not sufficient. Secondly, the relationship between the subject qualification and the validity of the transfer contract is discussed. The limitation of the subject qualification of the transferor and the transferee cannot affect the validity of the contract, and it is necessary to reflect on the legislative purpose and whether it adapts to the change of law and public policy. This paper discusses the nature and use of land and the validity of the contract of assignment. The nature and use of land is an absolute prohibition, once violated, the contract of assignment is void and subject to penalties in public law; fourthly, the written form and the validity of the contract of assignment are discussed. The transfer of the land contractual management right involves enormous interests, and the legal written form is the most basic requirement. Otherwise, it will affect the effectiveness of the transfer contract; on the basis of social realities, it should also be treated differently. Defects in the form may be corrected through the performance of the contract. The fourth part, put forward some perfect suggestions from legislation and judicature. Theoretically, it further demonstrates that restricting the transfer of contractual management right is not in line with the changes of social development; puts forward some perfect suggestions in legislation; finally, discusses what kind of interpretation method the court should choose when adjudicating a case. So that the specific cases can be solved fairly and justly. The fifth part summarizes the whole text from the macroscopic angle, and puts forward the final research conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.32
本文編號：2124354
[Abstract]:The transfer of land contractual management right involves the great interests of all parties and has been actively concerned by the legal theorists and practitioners. In order to solve this problem properly, scholars have put forward many theoretical suggestions, and many practical explorations have been carried out in various places. This paper mainly studies the transfer of contractual management right from the perspective of contract effectiveness. That is to say, on the basis of sorting out a large number of judicial judgments, some mandatory norms affecting the effectiveness of transfer contracts have been refined, and detailed analysis and argumentation have been carried out from the legal theory, showing their own views. Confirmed the transfer of contractual management rights behavior. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part briefly introduces the arrangement of judicial judgments, analyzes in detail the differences in the validity of the transfer contract, and finally leads to the specific problems to be analyzed. The second part discusses the relationship between the mandatory norms and the validity of the transfer contract from the aspects of theory and legislation. Which norms belong to mandatory norms and which mandatory norms can affect the effectiveness of contracts, the theoretical study continues to deepen, the legal provisions are constantly changing. At the end of this part, the author analyzes and summarizes the two aspects, and puts forward that it is necessary to judge whether the mandatory norms affect the effectiveness of the contract from two aspects: the purpose of the norm and the interests of the norm. The third part is the focus of the paper. We take the judicial cases as the starting point, take the specific provisions as the analysis object, synthetically consider the normative nature and normative interests of the Rural Land contract Law, and measure the value and interests through the value judgment. The relationship between the mandatory norms and the validity of the transfer contract is demonstrated from four aspects. First, it discusses the relationship between the agreement of the issuing party and the validity of the contract of assignment. Although the law stipulates that the transfer of the land contractual management right is subject to the consent of the contracting party, the reasons for making this provision are not sufficient. Secondly, the relationship between the subject qualification and the validity of the transfer contract is discussed. The limitation of the subject qualification of the transferor and the transferee cannot affect the validity of the contract, and it is necessary to reflect on the legislative purpose and whether it adapts to the change of law and public policy. This paper discusses the nature and use of land and the validity of the contract of assignment. The nature and use of land is an absolute prohibition, once violated, the contract of assignment is void and subject to penalties in public law; fourthly, the written form and the validity of the contract of assignment are discussed. The transfer of the land contractual management right involves enormous interests, and the legal written form is the most basic requirement. Otherwise, it will affect the effectiveness of the transfer contract; on the basis of social realities, it should also be treated differently. Defects in the form may be corrected through the performance of the contract. The fourth part, put forward some perfect suggestions from legislation and judicature. Theoretically, it further demonstrates that restricting the transfer of contractual management right is not in line with the changes of social development; puts forward some perfect suggestions in legislation; finally, discusses what kind of interpretation method the court should choose when adjudicating a case. So that the specific cases can be solved fairly and justly. The fifth part summarizes the whole text from the macroscopic angle, and puts forward the final research conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.32
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 辛正郁;;農(nóng)村土地承包糾紛案件審判實(shí)踐中的若干疑難問題[J];法律適用;2010年11期
2 馬新彥,李國強(qiáng);土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的物權(quán)法思考[J];法商研究;2005年05期
3 陳小君;;農(nóng)村土地制度的物權(quán)法規(guī)范解析——學(xué)習(xí)《關(guān)于推進(jìn)農(nóng)村改革發(fā)展若干重大問題的決定》后的思考[J];法商研究;2009年01期
4 許中緣;;論違反公法規(guī)定對法律行為效力的影響——再評《中華人民共和國合同法》第52條第5項(xiàng)[J];法商研究;2011年01期
5 龍翼飛;趙嵐音;;農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)法律問題新探——以北京地區(qū)部分基層人民法院所審理土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)糾紛案件為例[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年05期
6 黃忠;;違法合同的效力判定路徑之辨識[J];法學(xué)家;2010年05期
7 溫世揚(yáng);蘭曉為;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)中的利益沖突與立法選擇[J];法學(xué)評論;2010年01期
8 張璐;;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的法律理性與制度選擇[J];法學(xué);2008年12期
9 許中緣;;禁止性規(guī)范對民事法律行為效力的影響[J];法學(xué);2010年05期
10 冀誠;;對我國合同法上強(qiáng)制性規(guī)定的類型分析[J];北方法學(xué);2012年04期
，本文編號：2124354
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2124354.html
最近更新
教材專著
