本文選題：小產(chǎn)權房 + 產(chǎn)權　； 參考：《蘭州大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：“小產(chǎn)權房”在近些年來一次又一次的成為社會議論的焦點。由于小產(chǎn)權房不需要繳納諸如土地出讓金、土地征用費、耕地占用稅、房產(chǎn)開發(fā)稅、城市基礎設施配套費等費用及成本,因此其銷售價格也相對于普通商品房要優(yōu)惠不少。 然而,由于我國目前的法律政策對小產(chǎn)權房的自由流轉(zhuǎn)作出了種種限制,其身份的“非法”性引發(fā)了一系列社會矛盾和糾紛。盡管社會各方面均不斷針對小產(chǎn)權房問題表達自己的明確立場,但是面對小產(chǎn)權房背后紛亂繁雜的各種社會政治、經(jīng)濟、法律問題,無論是最為嚴格的“堵”與較為柔和的“疏”均不能夠使得該問題得到妥善處理。 本文引言部分首先分析了“小產(chǎn)權房”的相關基本問題,對筆者的思考路徑加以簡單的闡述。在正文的四個部分中,第一部分對“小產(chǎn)權房”的定義、特征以及其所處的法律地位的困境進行介紹,為全文的展開論述作下鋪墊；第二部分對小產(chǎn)權房法律地位模糊之根源進行探析,指出其根本原因在于集體土地制度的模糊性,同時,對于小產(chǎn)權房背后所牽涉的利益主體的立場做出分析,以明晰各方在小產(chǎn)權房合法化問題上各自的利益考量；第三部分通過對“小產(chǎn)權房”所引發(fā)的法律糾紛案例進行分析,指出目前司法實踐針對相關問題所作的無奈選擇,“失序”的司法判決不利于維護法律的嚴肅性；最后第四部分,本文站在疏導相關矛盾的角度對小產(chǎn)權房所引發(fā)的糾紛提出司法處理建議,當然,更為重要的是,指出我們從根本上解決小產(chǎn)權房問題的制度選擇。
[Abstract]:In recent years, "small property right" has become the focus of social discussion again and again. Because the small property house does not need to pay such as land transfer fee, land expropriation fee, cultivated land occupation tax, real estate development tax, urban infrastructure supporting fees and other expenses and costs, so its sales price is more favorable than ordinary commercial housing. However, due to various restrictions on the free circulation of small property houses in China's current legal policies, the "illegal" nature of their status has led to a series of social contradictions and disputes. Although all sectors of society have constantly expressed their clear position on the issue of small property housing, but in the face of various social, political, economic, and legal problems behind small property houses, Neither the strictest plugging nor the softer clogging can properly deal with the problem. The preface of this paper first analyzes the basic problems of "small property right", and gives a brief explanation of the author's thinking path. In the four parts of the text, the first part introduces the definition, characteristics and the dilemma of the legal status of "small property right", which lays the groundwork for the full text. The second part analyzes the root cause of the ambiguity of the legal status of the small property house, and points out that the fundamental reason lies in the fuzziness of the collective land system. At the same time, the position of the interest subject involved in the small property house is analyzed. In order to clarify the interests of each side on the issue of legalization of small property houses, the third part analyzes the cases of legal disputes caused by "small property houses", and points out the helpless choices made by judicial practice in view of the relevant problems at present. The judicial decision of "disorder" is not conducive to maintaining the seriousness of the law. Finally, in the fourth part, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the judicial treatment of disputes caused by the small property right house from the angle of dredging the related contradictions, and, of course, more importantly, Pointed out that we fundamentally solve the problem of small property rights system choice.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.29

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 孟勤國;;揭開中國土地私有化論的面紗[J];北方法學;2010年01期

2 許章潤;;地權的國家德性[J];比較法研究;2010年02期

3 唐滿榮;;不可分共同共有:集體土地所有權制度重構(gòu)[J];重慶工商大學學報(西部論壇);2008年02期

4 于伯華,鄭新奇;耕地危機與城市化進程的盲目性[J];城市問題;2003年03期

5 許經(jīng)勇;;用資本原始積累審視我國“三農(nóng)問題”[J];調(diào)研世界;2008年08期

6 賀雪峰;;農(nóng)村土地何以成了問題[J];調(diào)研世界;2008年10期

7 孟勤國;;物權法如何保護集體財產(chǎn)[J];法學;2006年01期

8 高富平;;平等保護原則和私人物權制度檢討[J];法學;2007年05期

9 溫世揚;略論中國民法物權體系[J];法學;1997年06期

10 蔣冬連;;淺議農(nóng)村土地征收行政補償?shù)膯栴}[J];傳承;2009年24期

，

本文編號：2098723