本文選題：法定開發(fā)條件 + 土地使用權轉讓��； 參考：《南京社會科學》2015年07期

【摘要】：我國司法實踐中,未達到法定開發(fā)條件的土地使用權轉讓案件,各地法院判決不一,嚴重損害了司法判決的統(tǒng)一性和法律的權威性�，F行法律規(guī)定的土地使用權轉讓的開發(fā)投資限制,會被一方當事人為獲取更大利益而利用,司法權力容易被濫用,導致實質公正受損,不利于我國誠信社會的建設,也嚴重損害了土地使用權轉讓的交易安全,與現行土地流轉政策不符�；谖餀�、合同、土地管理目的等角度,重新審視我國《城市房地產管理法》第39條的規(guī)定及其存在的合理性,本研究認為應在立法層面解決司法困局,并刪除開發(fā)投資比例這一法定轉讓條件,不管土地是否達到法定投資開發(fā)條件,土地管理部門都應辦理土地變更登記。
[Abstract]:In the judicial practice of our country, the cases of transfer of land use right which have not met the legal conditions of development have been decided by different courts, which have seriously damaged the unity of judicial decisions and the authority of the law. The restrictions on the development and investment of the transfer of the land use right stipulated by the current law will be used by one party in order to obtain greater interests, and the judicial power will be easily abused, resulting in the damage of substantive justice, which is not conducive to the construction of a good faith society in our country. It also seriously damages the transaction security of land use right transfer, which is inconsistent with the current land transfer policy. Based on the angle of real right, contract and land management purpose, the article 39 of Urban Real Estate Management Law of our country and the rationality of its existence are re-examined. This study holds that the judicial difficulties should be solved at the legislative level. And remove the legal transfer condition of the proportion of development investment, regardless of whether the land meets the legal conditions of investment and development, the land management department should handle the land change registration.
【作者單位】： 廣東工業(yè)大學政法學院;
【分類號】：D922.29
，

本文編號：1912177