本文選題：人工授精 + 異質(zhì)人工授精�。� 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：自異質(zhì)人工授精技術(shù)在我國應(yīng)用以來,在相當(dāng)長的一段時間內(nèi)沒有相應(yīng)的法律規(guī)范相關(guān)的問題,我國衛(wèi)生部直到2001年末才相繼頒布《輔助生殖技術(shù)管理辦法》、《人類精子庫管理辦法》兩個規(guī)范性文件用于指導(dǎo)異質(zhì)人工授精的運(yùn)作,而涉及異質(zhì)人工授精親子關(guān)系的相關(guān)法律問題卻一直沒有相應(yīng)的法律規(guī)定,實踐中作為法院判決依據(jù)沿用的是最高人民法院1991年的《最高人民法院關(guān)于夫妻離婚后人工授精所生子女的法律地位如何確定的復(fù)函》(以下簡稱《復(fù)函》)。但異質(zhì)人工授精引發(fā)了許多社會乃至法律難題,單純依賴《復(fù)函》已經(jīng)明顯不能適應(yīng)現(xiàn)實需要。尤其是對異質(zhì)人工授精引發(fā)的法律問題,該如何處理是立法亟待面對的問題。本文就異質(zhì)人工授精引發(fā)的一個案例作為切入點(diǎn),力求為解決相關(guān)系列問題給出自己的法律建議。論文大體上分為引言、正文與結(jié)語三大部分,主要內(nèi)容如下:引言部分初步介紹了規(guī)范異質(zhì)人工授精的相關(guān)法律以及帶來的法律問題。第一章異質(zhì)人工授精概述。首先,介紹異質(zhì)人工授精的相關(guān)概念;其次,分析了異質(zhì)人工授精的價值沖突。第二章異質(zhì)人工授精中的法律問題。主要是異質(zhì)人工授精對傳統(tǒng)親子關(guān)系的影響以及我國的立法現(xiàn)狀與缺陷等問題。第三章域外異質(zhì)人工授精比較法研究。本章納入比較法研究的既包括以美國、英國和香港特區(qū)為代表的英美法系國家與地區(qū),還包括以德國、瑞典以及中國臺灣地區(qū)為代表的大陸法系國家。總結(jié)了上述國家和地區(qū)在異質(zhì)人工授精立法上的優(yōu)勢與劣勢。第四章是完善我國異質(zhì)人工授精立法的構(gòu)想,也是論文最重要的部分。它嘗試在借鑒上述域外經(jīng)驗與我國實踐的基礎(chǔ)上,確立未成年子女利益最優(yōu)原則,規(guī)范父親的確定規(guī)則,允許丈夫有條件提起否認(rèn)之訴。賦予異質(zhì)人工授精子女獨(dú)立的法律地位,并且限制親子鑒定在異質(zhì)人工授精中的使用。
[Abstract]:Since the application of artificial insemination technology in China, there has been no relevant legal norms related to a considerable period of time. The Ministry of health of China has not promulgated the management methods of auxiliary reproductive technology until the end of 2001, and the management method of human sperm bank is used to guide the operation of hetero artificial insemination by two parts. The relevant legal issues related to the parent-child relationship of hetero artificial insemination have no corresponding legal provisions. In practice, the legal status of the Supreme People's Court on the basis of the Supreme People's court in 1991 is the reply of the Supreme People's Court on how the legal status of the legal status of the children born by artificial insemination after the divorce of husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as the reply to the reply). Artificial insemination has caused many social and legal problems, and simply relying on "reply" has obviously failed to adapt to the actual needs. Especially, how to deal with the legal problems caused by heterogeneous artificial insemination is an urgent problem to be dealt with. In this paper, a case initiated by heterogeneous artificial insemination is taken as a breakthrough point to solve the related series. The question gives its own legal advice. The thesis is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The main contents are as follows: in the introduction, the relevant laws and legal problems are introduced. The first chapter is a summary of the heterogeneous artificial insemination. First, introduce the related concepts of heterogeneous artificial insemination; secondly, analyze the related concepts of artificial insemination. The value conflict of heterogeneous artificial insemination. In the second chapter, the legal problems in the heterogeneous artificial insemination are mainly related to the influence of the heterogeneous artificial insemination on the traditional parent-child relationship and the status and defects of our country's legislation. The third chapter of the comparative study of the foreign insemination in foreign countries. This chapter includes the United States, the United Kingdom and the Hong Kong The special economic zone, represented by the Anglo American law countries and regions, and the continental law countries represented by Germany, Sweden and the Taiwan region of China, summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the above-mentioned countries and regions in the legislation of heterogeneous artificial insemination. The fourth chapter is the concept of improving China's heterogeneous artificial insemination and the most important part of the thesis. On the basis of these foreign experiences and our country's practice, we try to establish the principle of the best interests of the minor children, standardize the rules of the father's determination, allow the husband to bring the disregard of the complaint, give the independent legal status of the children of the heterogeneous artificial insemination, and limit the use of the paternity test in the heterogeneous artificial insemination.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.16

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張麗;異質(zhì)人工授精法律問題探析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：1812069