本文選題：比例原則 + 行政強(qiáng)制��； 參考：《廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：行政強(qiáng)制作為實(shí)現(xiàn)政府行政目的有效手段之一，與公民的自由、尊嚴(yán)和財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利息息相關(guān)�！缎姓䦶�(qiáng)制法》的出臺(tái)為規(guī)范我國行政強(qiáng)制奠定基礎(chǔ)。其中第五條明確規(guī)定行政強(qiáng)制的實(shí)施應(yīng)遵循比例原則，這對(duì)我國行政強(qiáng)制的實(shí)踐具有重大意義。比例原則是通過調(diào)整手段和目的、公共利益和私人利益間的關(guān)系,要求手段與目的、公益與私益相協(xié)調(diào),平衡國家權(quán)力與公民權(quán)利間的關(guān)系,最終達(dá)到保障公民權(quán)利、實(shí)現(xiàn)實(shí)質(zhì)正義。文章從比例原則在行政強(qiáng)制中的價(jià)值體現(xiàn)入手，總結(jié)國內(nèi)外行政強(qiáng)制立法中關(guān)于比例原則的規(guī)定，并引例分析比例原則在行政強(qiáng)制中適用的困境，進(jìn)而從宏觀、中觀、微觀角度提出完善的意見和路徑。本文共分為四部分。 第一部分為比例原則在行政強(qiáng)制中的適用價(jià)值。首先介紹比例原則三項(xiàng)子原則的內(nèi)涵,在此基礎(chǔ)上探討比例原則在行政強(qiáng)制中的合理性依據(jù)，最后從理論和實(shí)踐兩方面討論比例原則在行政強(qiáng)制中的適用價(jià)值。 第二部分全面介紹了國內(nèi)外行政強(qiáng)制中比例原則的適用。首先本章按照立法模式的不同，比較了比例原則在集中式立法、分散式立法模式的各國家的實(shí)踐情況。其次，對(duì)我國行政強(qiáng)制中比例原則的應(yīng)用進(jìn)行梳理，總結(jié)我國行政強(qiáng)制在比例原則指導(dǎo)下的適用規(guī)則。 第三部分為比例原則在行政強(qiáng)制中適用的現(xiàn)實(shí)檢討。首先,通過砸窗執(zhí)法、強(qiáng)制拆遷、眼神執(zhí)法三個(gè)案例分析比例原則在行政強(qiáng)制的現(xiàn)實(shí)應(yīng)用中存在的問題，包括內(nèi)容抽象、主觀性強(qiáng)、適用被動(dòng)等。從而分析比例原則適用的困境及原因。通過結(jié)合案例具體了解比例原則我國行政強(qiáng)制實(shí)踐中的適用困境。 第四部分為行政強(qiáng)制中比例原則適用的修正與完善。根據(jù)比例原則的適用困境從宏觀、中觀、微觀三個(gè)層面提出完善比例原則在行政強(qiáng)制中適用的路徑。宏觀方向包括比例原則的改造、建立回應(yīng)型行政模式，中觀把握包括排除不合比例性的強(qiáng)制手段、選擇合必要性的行政手段，，微觀操作包括細(xì)化立法、轉(zhuǎn)變觀念等。
[Abstract]:As one of the effective means to realize the administrative purpose of the government, the administrative compulsion is closely related to the citizens' freedom, dignity and property rights. The introduction of the Administrative compulsory Law lays the foundation for standardizing the administrative coercion in our country. Article 5 clearly stipulates that the implementation of administrative compulsion should follow the principle of proportionality, which is of great significance to the practice of administrative compulsion in our country. The principle of proportionality is to balance the relationship between state power and civil rights by adjusting the relationship between means and ends, public interests and private interests, requiring means and ends, and public and private interests. To achieve substantive justice. This paper begins with the value embodiment of the principle of proportion in the administrative enforcement, summarizes the provisions of the principle of proportion in the legislation of administrative compulsion at home and abroad, and analyses the dilemma of the application of the principle of proportion in the process of administrative compulsion with examples, and then from the macroscopic and the meso-level. The micro-angle puts forward the perfect opinion and the path. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is the applicable value of the principle of proportionality in administrative enforcement. This paper first introduces the connotation of the three sub-principles of the principle of proportion, then discusses the rational basis of the principle of proportion in the administrative enforcement, and finally discusses the applicable value of the principle of proportion in the administrative compulsion from both theoretical and practical aspects. The second part introduces the application of the principle of proportionality in administrative compulsion at home and abroad. First of all, according to the different legislative models, this chapter compares the practice of the proportional principle in centralized legislation and decentralized legislation. Secondly, the application of the principle of proportionality in China's administrative compulsion is combed, and the applicable rules under the guidance of the principle of proportionality are summarized. The third part is the practical review of the application of the principle of proportionality in administrative enforcement. First of all, through the window law enforcement, forced demolition, eye law enforcement three case analysis of the principle of proportion in the administrative enforcement of the actual application of the existing problems, including abstract content, strong subjectivity, applicable passive and so on. Thus, the paper analyzes the dilemma and reasons of the application of the principle of proportionality. Through the combination of specific cases to understand the principle of proportionality in China's administrative enforcement practice of the application of the dilemma. The fourth part is the revision and perfection of the application of the principle of proportionality in administrative compulsion. According to the difficulty of the application of the principle of proportion, this paper puts forward the path of perfecting the principle of proportion in the administrative enforcement from three aspects: macroscopic, meso and micro. The macro direction includes the reform of the principle of proportionality, the establishment of a responsive administrative model, the control of the meso-view including the elimination of disproportionate coercive means, the selection of necessary administrative means, and the microscopic operation including the refinement of legislation and the transformation of ideas and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王貴松;;行政裁量權(quán)收縮的法理基礎(chǔ)——職權(quán)職責(zé)義務(wù)化的轉(zhuǎn)換依據(jù)[J];北大法律評(píng)論;2009年02期

2 張婧飛;任峰;;行政強(qiáng)制權(quán)屬性研究[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

3 黃學(xué)賢;行政法中的比例原則研究[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

4 方世榮;對(duì)當(dāng)代行政法主體雙方地位平等的認(rèn)知——從行政相對(duì)人的視角[J];法商研究;2002年06期

5 胡建淼;蔣紅珍;;論最小侵害原則在行政強(qiáng)制法中的適用[J];法學(xué)家;2006年03期

6 王貴松;;行政裁量收縮論的形成與展開——以危險(xiǎn)防止型行政為中心[J];法學(xué)家;2008年04期

7 楊解君;論行政法理念的塑造——契約理念與權(quán)力理念的整合[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2003年01期

8 崔卓蘭;張婧飛;;追求過程與結(jié)果的雙重價(jià)值——圍繞我國行政強(qiáng)制立法的探索[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

9 王桂源;論法國行政法中的均衡原則[J];法學(xué)研究;1994年03期

10 徐繼強(qiáng);;憲法權(quán)利規(guī)范的結(jié)構(gòu)及其推理方式[J];法學(xué)研究;2010年04期

本文編號(hào)：1808488