本文選題：公職人員 + 財產(chǎn)申報與公開��； 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：不受制約的權(quán)力，必然導(dǎo)致權(quán)力腐敗。法律是遏制權(quán)力濫用、腐敗橫生的最主要的武器，而公職人員財產(chǎn)申報公開制度更是一把反腐的利刃，更是被譽為“陽光法案”，可見公職人員財產(chǎn)申報公開制度在遏制權(quán)力腐敗上有著立竿見影的效果。因此，本文以法學(xué)理論為基礎(chǔ)分析公職人員財產(chǎn)申報與公開制度是如何制約和監(jiān)督權(quán)力腐敗的，從我國不斷的實踐腳步中分析在我國這項制度的受阻的原因，詳細(xì)研究這項制度的法理基礎(chǔ)，探究其預(yù)防制約權(quán)力腐敗的效能，借鑒國外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗，提出一些具體有可操作性的建議。 本文是由四個部分構(gòu)成。 第一部分為導(dǎo)論。主要解決四個問題，一是選題意義從理論與實踐角度進(jìn)行闡述；二是研究背景主要從社會背景與這項制度的理論、實踐現(xiàn)狀等方面進(jìn)行簡要闡述；三是研究創(chuàng)新與研究方法，從這項制度的法理基礎(chǔ)探究制度對權(quán)力腐敗的效用，采用社會實證、價值分析及比較分析等方法詳細(xì)的進(jìn)行研究。 第二部分為第一章和第二章。從公職人員財產(chǎn)申報公開制度的理論基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行研究，分析這樣制度的優(yōu)勢與缺陷。找到公職人員財產(chǎn)申報公開制度在制約、預(yù)防權(quán)力腐敗上最根本的法理依據(jù)并進(jìn)行研究，，以達(dá)到制約權(quán)力腐敗的最終效用。 第三部分為第三章和第四章。從公職人員財產(chǎn)申報公開制度在我國的實踐狀況分析，研究這項制度在我國難以建立的阻力，分析利益沖突管理制度的欠缺，政府信息公開制度的不完善以及廉政文化道德管理的不健全妨礙我國公職人員財產(chǎn)申報公開制度建立健全的原因，并吸收國外先進(jìn)的理論與實踐經(jīng)驗作為啟示，明確我國公職人員財產(chǎn)申報公開制度的社會價值及建立的必要性。 第四部分為第五章。綜合上述分析與研究，提出健全完善公職人員財產(chǎn)申報公開制度的合理的、具體的、具有可操作性的建議，使得其更加有效的制約和監(jiān)督權(quán)力，最終能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)防治權(quán)力腐敗的作用。
[Abstract]:The unchecked power will inevitably lead to power corruption.The law is the most important weapon to curb the abuse of power and corruption, and the system of public property declaration and disclosure of public officials' property is even more a blade of anti-corruption, and is also known as the "Sunshine Act."It can be seen that the open system of property declaration of public officials has an immediate effect on curbing power corruption.Therefore, based on the theory of law, this paper analyzes how the system of property declaration and disclosure of public officials restricts and supervises corruption, and analyzes the reasons for the obstruction of this system in our country from our country's unceasing practice.This paper makes a detailed study of the legal basis of this system, probes into its effectiveness in preventing and restricting power corruption, draws lessons from foreign advanced experience, and puts forward some practical suggestions.This paper is composed of four parts.The first part is an introduction.It mainly solves four problems: first, the significance of selecting the topic is expounded from the angle of theory and practice; second, the research background is briefly expounded from the social background, the theory of this system, the present situation of practice and so on; the third is the research innovation and research methods.From the legal basis of this system to explore the effectiveness of the system to power corruption, the use of social empirical, value analysis and comparative analysis and other methods of detailed research.The second part is the first and second chapters.This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of this system from the theoretical basis of the public property declaration system.To find the most fundamental legal basis and research on the restriction and prevention of power corruption in the system of public property declaration for public officials in order to achieve the ultimate effect of restricting power corruption.The third part is the third and fourth chapters.Based on the analysis of the practice of the public property declaration system of public officials in China, this paper studies the resistance that it is difficult to establish in our country, and analyzes the deficiency of the system of conflict of interest management.The imperfection of the government information disclosure system and the imperfection of the cultural and moral management of a clean government hinders the establishment of a sound property declaration and disclosure system for public officials in our country, and draws on the advanced theories and practical experience of foreign countries as inspiration.To clarify the social value and the necessity of establishing the public property declaration system of public officials in China.The fourth part is the fifth chapter.By synthesizing the above analysis and research, the author puts forward some reasonable, concrete and operable suggestions to perfect and perfect the public property declaration and publicity system for public officials, so as to make it more effective in restricting and supervising power.Finally, the role of preventing and controlling power corruption can be realized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉俊杰;;當(dāng)代中國權(quán)力制衡結(jié)構(gòu)的完善與變革[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會主義;2009年01期

2 王明高,胡祥勇;中國家庭財產(chǎn)申報制的建立與健全[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2004年01期

3 楊芳;;論反腐倡廉建設(shè)中權(quán)力制衡機制的科學(xué)化[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年01期

4 楚文凱;;關(guān)于借鑒國外防止利益沖突做法的思考[J];中國監(jiān)察;2006年14期

5 王錫鋅;;信息公開的制度實踐及其外部環(huán)境——以政府信息公開的制度環(huán)境為視角的觀察[J];南開學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年02期

6 鄒洪凱;;領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部財產(chǎn)申報的制度困境與路徑選擇[J];廉政文化研究;2013年03期

7 袁東生;;我國實行官員財產(chǎn)公開的路徑分析[J];山東社會科學(xué);2011年02期

8 徐映梅;張學(xué)新;;中國基尼系數(shù)警戒線的一個估計[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2011年01期

9 李瑜青;張善根;;政府信息公開制度實施的問題及對策建議——以上海為例[J];北京行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

10 湯唯;論權(quán)力腐敗的法律監(jiān)督[J];煙臺大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年04期

本文編號：1762028