本文選題：行政協(xié)商 + 行政程序　； 參考：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：行政協(xié)商制度作為行政法理論與協(xié)商制度有機結(jié)合的產(chǎn)物，為行政主體與行政相對人搭建起理性交往與利益博弈的平臺。作為一種行政程序，行政協(xié)商制度的設(shè)計初衷在于預防并減少行政糾紛發(fā)生的可能性，同時阻斷后續(xù)可能產(chǎn)生的救濟環(huán)節(jié)，節(jié)約行政與司法成本。行政協(xié)商制度的建構(gòu)打破以往過分注重于事后救濟研究的迷思，轉(zhuǎn)而以“預防糾紛”為切入點進行系統(tǒng)性的建構(gòu)。以“合意”為理念建構(gòu)的行政協(xié)商制度，其以哈貝馬斯“交往理性”為基礎(chǔ)，重塑行政主體與行政相對人之間的關(guān)系紐帶。較之現(xiàn)有制度設(shè)計，行政協(xié)商制度給予行政相對人更大的話語空間，同時起到監(jiān)督行政主體與保障公眾知情權(quán)的功能，具有獨立價值。行政協(xié)商制度作為一種“善治”，其建構(gòu)具有較高的可行性，其效用從微觀上不僅可以提高行政相對人對行政決定的接受程度，而且可以使行政主體與行政相對人進入從“對抗”走向“合作”的良性循環(huán)，而從宏觀上是改善當前社會行政糾紛高發(fā)、易發(fā)現(xiàn)狀的迫切需要，更是社會管理模式從“管理”走向“治理”的一次有益嘗試，同時也是對當前行政法理論與實踐的發(fā)展與完善。 文章主體部分共分為四章，前三章為行政協(xié)商制度建構(gòu)的理論部分，第四章為行政協(xié)商制度的具體建構(gòu)部分。 第一章主要涉及行政協(xié)商制度的興起背景。筆者分別從經(jīng)濟、政治、文化、社會四個維度，論證行政協(xié)商制度的興起，表明該制度在當前具備建構(gòu)的土壤，符合國家與社會的內(nèi)在需求，具有建構(gòu)的必要性。 第二章主要涉及行政協(xié)商制度的基本原理。筆者以行政法的理論變遷為切入點，提出行政協(xié)商制度建構(gòu)的哲學基礎(chǔ)與政治基礎(chǔ)，繼而在對其概念、特征進行論證的基礎(chǔ)上，對該制度的學理定位與功能價值予以闡釋，從不同面向完成對行政協(xié)商制度基本原理的闡述。 第三章主要涉及行政協(xié)商制度的可行性論證。筆者認為應(yīng)當主要論證兩個大問題：一方面是論證該制度的建構(gòu)并沒有突破當前依法行政基本原則的框架，行政協(xié)商的運行并未動搖公權(quán)力的基礎(chǔ)，另一方面則是論證該制度是行政主體與行政相對人能夠接受并執(zhí)行的。為此，筆者通過法學、談判學與倫理學三個面向，對行政協(xié)商制度的可行性予以論證。 第四章主要涉及行政協(xié)商制度的具體建構(gòu)。筆者以前述的論證為基礎(chǔ)，以“總論-分論”的形式開展論證�？傉摬糠种饕婕爸T如協(xié)商參與人的資格、協(xié)商標的、協(xié)商時間與地點、協(xié)商程序及其效力、協(xié)商文書等基本問題，分論部分則以行政立法活動與行政執(zhí)法活動為代表，，分別進行行政協(xié)商制度在程序上的具體建構(gòu)，主要包括協(xié)商參與人、可以協(xié)商的范圍以及協(xié)商的具體步驟。與此同時，為保障與監(jiān)督行政協(xié)商制度，通過對不同情形的分析，提出相應(yīng)的保障與監(jiān)督措施，確保行政協(xié)商制度的順利運行。
[Abstract]:Administrative consultation system as a product of the combination of theory and negotiation of administrative law system, administrative body and the administrative relative person to build physical intercourse and the interests of the game platform. As a kind of administrative procedure, administrative consultation system is designed to prevent and reduce the possibility of administrative disputes occur at the same time, blocking subsequent possible relief link save, administrative and judicial costs. Construction of administrative consultation system breaks overly focused on relief study of myth, turn to "prevent disputes" as the starting point for the construction of the system. The "agreement" for the administrative consultation system of the construction of the idea, which is based on Habermas "communicative rationality", the ties between the remodeling the administrative body and the administrative relative person. Compared with the existing system design, administrative consultation system to give the administrative relative person more discourse space, and at the same time for supervision The administrative body and protect the public's right to know the function of independent value. Administrative consultation system is a kind of "good governance", the construction of a high feasibility, its utility from the micro can not only improve the administrative relative degree of acceptance of administrative decisions, but also can make the administrative body and the administrative relative person to enter the virtuous cycle from "against" to "cooperation", and from the macro is to improve the current social administrative dispute is high, easy to find the urgent need to shape, it is a useful attempt of social management mode from "management" to "governance", but also for the development and perfection of the administrative law theory and practice.
The main part of the article is divided into four chapters. The first three chapters are the theoretical part of the construction of the administrative consultation system, and the fourth chapter is the concrete construction part of the administrative consultation system.
The first chapter mainly discusses the background of the rise of administrative consultation system. The author from the economic, political, cultural, social four dimensions, the rise of administrative consultation system demonstration, show that the system has in the current construction of the soil, with the internal demand of state and society, it is necessary to construct.
The second chapter mainly involves the basic principle of administrative consultation system. Based on the theory of change of administrative law as the starting point, put forward the philosophical basis and political basis of construction of administrative consultation system, and then based on its concept, characteristics of argumentation, academic orientation and function value of the system is explained, from different aspects of completion the basic principle of administrative consultation system in this paper.
The third chapter mainly involves the feasibility of administrative consultation system. The author believes that we should mainly demonstrate two major problems: one is the construction of the demonstration system did not break through the current administrative law basic principle framework, basis of administrative consultation operation has not shaken the public power, on the other hand is to demonstrate that the system is the administrative subject and administrative the relative people can accept and implement. Therefore, according to the law, negotiation and ethics in three aspects, the feasibility of administrative consultation system to demonstrate.
The fourth chapter mainly involves the construction of administrative consultation system. Based on the above argument, the "general - Theory" out in the form of argument. The introduction part mainly involves the qualification of people such as negotiation and participation, CO brand, negotiation time and place, negotiation process and force, the basic problem of negotiation documents. Part is based on the administrative legislation and administrative law enforcement activities as the representative, respectively the specific construction of administrative consultation system in the program, including negotiation and participation, the specific steps can range consultation and negotiate. At the same time, for the protection and supervision of administrative consultation system, through the analysis of different conditions, put forward corresponding measures to guarantee and supervision, to ensure smooth running of administrative consultation system.

【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈巋;關(guān)于美國協(xié)商制定規(guī)章程序的分析[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1999年02期

2 劉莘;;行政復議的發(fā)展歷程與未來展望[J];江蘇社會科學;2008年05期

3 王學輝;鄧蔚;;價值的超越:以交往正義的新視角詮釋行政訴訟協(xié)調(diào)和解機制[J];理論與改革;2012年01期

4 陳家剛;協(xié)商民主引論[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實;2004年03期

5 宋雅萍;;論主體間性[J];馬克思主義哲學研究;2008年00期

6 徐博嘉;;行政協(xié)商制度的合理性證成[J];理論與現(xiàn)代化;2013年03期

7 盧瑾;;“第三種”民主模式——哈貝馬斯協(xié)商民主觀剖析[J];探索;2008年04期

8 莫于川;法治視野中的行政指導行為——論我國行政指導的合法性問題與法治化路徑[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2004年03期

9 楊解君;張治宇;;論行政立法中的溝通與協(xié)商[J];行政法學研究;2006年03期

10 施建輝;;行政執(zhí)法中的協(xié)商與和解[J];行政法學研究;2006年03期

本文編號：1733545