本文選題：生態(tài)損害 + 基金�。� 參考：《甘肅政法學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)今各國都在尋求更好的途徑來保持經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和環(huán)境保護(hù)兩者之間的平衡,傳統(tǒng)狹隘的救濟(jì)方式已經(jīng)滿足不了日益復(fù)雜的生態(tài)損害現(xiàn)狀,要求發(fā)展新型的救濟(jì)方式的需求越來越強(qiáng)烈�；鹱鳛榻鹑诠ぞ叩囊环N,能夠起到良好的金融杠桿作用,集合分散的資金來填補(bǔ)需要巨大資金的損害,這是一種新的理念構(gòu)思和制度構(gòu)想,將其運用在生態(tài)損害侵權(quán)救濟(jì)上,將金融手段與法律手段進(jìn)行結(jié)合,這樣不僅能夠突破傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)損失由當(dāng)事人雙方承擔(dān)的狹窄框架,實現(xiàn)生態(tài)損害填補(bǔ)的社會化,而且能兼顧到環(huán)境效益與生態(tài)效益的統(tǒng)一彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)有民事救濟(jì)制度的不足。 而現(xiàn)行的生態(tài)損害填補(bǔ)救濟(jì)效率低下,實現(xiàn)基金的有效運行以及有實際的法律法規(guī)進(jìn)行規(guī)制成為當(dāng)前迫切需求。對生態(tài)損害填補(bǔ)社會化的基本理論和法律性質(zhì)進(jìn)行探討,并且能夠確定我國生態(tài)損害填補(bǔ)基金的資金來源,明確責(zé)任構(gòu)成和填補(bǔ)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),設(shè)立監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu),形成內(nèi)外結(jié)合的監(jiān)督模式,構(gòu)建出完整的生態(tài)基金法律制度,以達(dá)到增加生態(tài)污染損害的法律填補(bǔ)途徑,健全我國的生態(tài)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)法律制度。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, all countries are looking for better ways to maintain the balance between economic development and environmental protection. Traditional narrow relief methods can no longer meet the increasingly complex ecological damage situation.The demand for the development of new forms of relief is getting stronger and stronger.As a kind of financial instrument, fund can play a good role of financial leverage and collect scattered funds to fill the damage that needs huge funds. This is a new idea and system conception, which is applied to remedy the infringement of ecological damage.The combination of financial means and legal means can not only break through the narrow framework of traditional tort losses borne by both parties, but also realize the socialization of ecological damage compensation.Moreover, it can make up the deficiency of the existing civil relief system by taking into account the unification of environmental benefit and ecological benefit.But the current ecological damage compensation relief efficiency is low, to realize the effective operation of the fund and to have actual laws and regulations to regulate become the urgent need at present.This paper probes into the basic theoretical and legal nature of the socialization of ecological damage filling, and can determine the source of funds of the ecological damage compensation fund in our country, make clear the composition of liability and the standard of filling, and set up the supervision organization.In order to increase the damage of ecological pollution and improve the legal system of ecological tort relief in our country, a complete legal system of ecological fund can be constructed by forming the supervision mode of combination of internal and external.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.68

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李印;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)損害賠償及其社會化制度建設(shè)思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年08期

2 周珂,楊子蛟;論環(huán)境侵權(quán)損害填補(bǔ)綜合協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制[J];法學(xué)評論;2003年06期

3 劉靜;;試論建立我國環(huán)境損害公共補(bǔ)償制度[J];法制與社會;2007年04期

4 李妍輝;;環(huán)境污染損害社會化救濟(jì)——參考美國環(huán)境污染損害賠償基金[J];法制與社會;2008年17期

5 桑東莉;;美國《超級基金法》責(zé)任條款的司法博弈[J];法學(xué)評論;2013年01期

6 趙紅梅;李修棋;;無過錯污染受害者補(bǔ)償救濟(jì)的理論與制度選擇——一種社會法的觀察視角[J];環(huán)境資源法論叢;2005年00期

7 尤明青;;論環(huán)境污染健康損害救濟(jì)機(jī)制之完善路徑[J];環(huán)境資源法論叢;2010年00期

8 虞磊珉,王剛;美國“超級基金”中環(huán)境法律責(zé)任分析及實踐應(yīng)對[J];環(huán)境保護(hù);2004年07期

9 羅麗;;日本公害健康被害行政救濟(jì)制度的啟示[J];環(huán)境保護(hù);2009年20期

10 王世進(jìn);盧潔;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)責(zé)任的社會化救濟(jì)方式[J];環(huán)境經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年05期

，

本文編號：1733697