本文選題：醫(yī)療事故糾紛　切入點(diǎn)：解決制度　出處：《廣西大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：醫(yī)療事故糾紛如今已經(jīng)成為當(dāng)代熱議的話題,但是如何得到有效妥善的解決也一直是實(shí)踐中的難點(diǎn)。醫(yī)療事故糾紛是一種特殊性的民事糾紛,特定的內(nèi)容決定了與其他糾紛的本質(zhì)區(qū)別,特殊的屬性也決定了醫(yī)療事故糾紛解決制度的特點(diǎn)。然而,正是由于醫(yī)療事故糾紛解決制度的特殊之處的衍生了現(xiàn)行的解決制度所存在的局限性問題。 本文旨在解決醫(yī)療事故解決制度的特殊性問題,分析現(xiàn)行醫(yī)療事故糾紛解決制度的局限性,提出完善意見。本文采用并列式結(jié)構(gòu),按照醫(yī)療事故糾紛三種解決方式為內(nèi)容分成三個(gè)部分,每個(gè)部分均從相應(yīng)的醫(yī)療事故糾紛解決方式的定義入手,分析其特點(diǎn),分析了其局限性,從而分別形成了筆者在規(guī)定和解協(xié)議效力、允許醫(yī)療顧問參與和解,設(shè)立第三方調(diào)解制度,立法增強(qiáng)患者舉證能力、規(guī)定病歷遺失責(zé)任、規(guī)定因果關(guān)系舉證責(zé)任、限制法官鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)選擇權(quán)方面的完善意見。本文全面的分析了醫(yī)療事故糾紛解決制度的相關(guān)問題,重點(diǎn)探討了我國法律在此問題上的規(guī)定和不足,并提出了相應(yīng)的完善意見。希望能夠引起實(shí)務(wù)界與理論界對(duì)此問題的進(jìn)一步關(guān)注與探討,確實(shí)完善我國的醫(yī)療事故糾紛解決制度,使醫(yī)療事故糾紛能夠得到妥善有效的解決。
[Abstract]:Medical malpractice dispute has become a hot topic nowadays, but how to solve it effectively and properly has always been a difficult point in practice. Medical malpractice dispute is a special civil dispute. The specific content determines the essential difference from other disputes, and the special attribute also determines the characteristics of the medical accident dispute resolution system. It is because of the particularity of medical malpractice dispute resolution system that the limitation of the current system is derived. The purpose of this paper is to solve the particularity of medical malpractice resolution system, to analyze the limitation of current medical accident dispute resolution system, and to put forward some suggestions for perfection. According to the three methods of resolving medical malpractice dispute, it is divided into three parts. Each part begins with the definition of the corresponding medical accident dispute resolution method, analyzes its characteristics, and analyzes its limitations. As a result, the author respectively formed the effectiveness of the settlement agreement, allowed medical consultants to participate in the settlement, set up a third-party mediation system, legislated to enhance the patient's ability to provide evidence, stipulated the burden of medical record loss, and stipulated the burden of proof of causality. This article comprehensively analyzes the related problems of medical accident dispute resolution system, especially discusses the provisions and deficiencies of Chinese law on this issue. It is hoped that it will arouse further attention and probe into this problem in the field of practice and theory so as to perfect the dispute resolution system of medical malpractice in our country and make the dispute of medical accident be resolved properly and effectively.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉煙芳;;淺析我國醫(yī)療事故舉證責(zé)任倒置制度[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年21期

2 韓亞男;萬里濤;婁繼權(quán);;醫(yī)療糾紛處理模式及干預(yù)途徑[J];解放軍醫(yī)院管理雜志;2009年01期

3 李青霞;;淺析民事執(zhí)行和解制度[J];學(xué)理論;2011年29期

4 曾清;崔航;;醫(yī)患糾紛第三方解決機(jī)制成立的探討[J];中共樂山市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

5 佟占軍;孫雪芝;;試論抽象和具體民事法律關(guān)系[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

6 張s，

本文編號(hào)：1674685