本文選題：食品安全法　切入點：懲罰性賠償　出處：《上海師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：食品安全牽涉千家萬戶,每一次食品類的法律出臺都受到整個社會的高度關(guān)注,自2009年《中華人民共和國食品安全法》出臺,到2015年修訂《食品安全法》,懲罰性賠償制度就一直受到熱議。懲罰性賠償制度,本身就是一個充滿爭議的制度,它起源于英美法系,但是英美法系對這個制度也是有著較大的爭議,大陸法系的國家基本還沒有接受該制度,只是在一定程度上不再像以前那么反對懲罰性賠償制度。我國在《食品安全法》中引入該制度,在全國范圍內(nèi),不管是專家學者,又或者是普通公民,對此基本沒有什么反對的聲音。但是,在具體的實踐過程中,由于我國并沒有很堅實的法律理論作為支撐,導致該制度在現(xiàn)實適用中遇到了很多問題,例如賠償金的確定,該制度調(diào)整的主體范圍等都出現(xiàn)了爭議,為此在現(xiàn)實中也出現(xiàn)了同案不同判的情況。本文結(jié)構(gòu)一共分為五個部分,第一章是該制度適用的背景,國內(nèi)外的一些研究現(xiàn)狀等,以加強對該制度的發(fā)展及現(xiàn)狀的了解。第二章介紹了該制度的一些基本概念以及該制度的自身價值的體現(xiàn)。第三章具體介紹了該制度在我國《食品安全法》中的適用。在實踐中,關(guān)于懲罰性賠償金的合理確定,制度調(diào)整的主體,精神損害賠償金的缺失等方面,都存在不同程度的問題。第四章介紹了美國以及我國臺灣地區(qū)的食品安全懲罰性賠償制度,并加以分析。之所以選擇美國和臺灣地區(qū)的該制度,是由于該制度起源于英美法系,美國是世界上該制度發(fā)展的最成熟的國家,而臺灣是對于該制度本土化做的較好的地區(qū)。第五章則是針對該制度在我國存在的問題,提出將銷售者的重大過失行為納入調(diào)整,確定彈性賠償金,從賠償金中征收一定比例以建立相關(guān)基金,引入公益訴訟,以及增加精神損害賠償金等建議。
[Abstract]:Food safety involves thousands of households. Every time the food law is issued, the whole society pays close attention to it. Since 2009, the Food Safety Law of the people's Republic of China has been issued. By the time the Food Safety Act was amended in 2015, the punitive damages system has been the subject of heated discussion. The punitive damages system itself is a controversial system that originated in the Anglo-American legal system. However, the Anglo-American legal system is also controversial. Countries in the civil law system have basically not accepted the system. But to a certain extent, we are no longer as opposed to the punitive damages system as we used to be. Our country introduced this system in the Food Safety Law. Throughout the country, whether it is experts or scholars, or ordinary citizens, However, in the concrete practice process, because our country does not have the very solid legal theory as the support, causes this system to meet many problems in the practical application, for example, the determination of the compensation. The scope of the adjustment of the system has been controversial, and different judgments of the same case have also appeared in reality. The structure of this paper is divided into five parts. The first chapter is the background of the application of the system, and some domestic and foreign research status, etc. In order to strengthen the understanding of the development and present situation of the system, the second chapter introduces some basic concepts of the system and the embodiment of its own value. The third chapter introduces the system in the Food Safety Law of our country. Applicable... in practice, There are some problems about the reasonable determination of punitive damages, the subject of system adjustment, the lack of compensation for spiritual damages, etc. The fourth chapter introduces the food safety punitive damages system in the United States and Taiwan. The reason for choosing the system in the United States and Taiwan is that the system originated from the common law system, and the United States is the most mature country in the world for the development of this system. However, Taiwan is a good place for the localization of the system. The fifth chapter is aimed at the problems existing in the system in China, and proposes to bring the gross negligence of the sellers into the adjustment and determine the flexible compensation. Some suggestions such as setting up related funds, introducing public interest litigation, and increasing compensation for mental damages are proposed by levying a certain proportion of compensation.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.16

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 熊培芳;;中國食品安全問題現(xiàn)狀成因及對策研究[J];農(nóng)業(yè)與技術(shù);2016年07期

2 瞿靈敏;;精神損害賠償懲罰性與懲罰性賠償補償性之批判——兼論精神損害賠償與懲罰性賠償?shù)牧⒎ㄍ晟芠J];東方法學;2016年02期

3 稅兵;;懲罰性賠償?shù)囊?guī)范構(gòu)造——以最高人民法院第23號指導性案例為中心[J];法學;2015年04期

4 孫效敏;張炳;;懲罰性賠償制度質(zhì)疑——兼評《侵權(quán)責任法》第47條[J];法學論壇;2015年02期

5 楊立新;;我國消費者保護懲罰性賠償?shù)男掳l(fā)展[J];法學家;2014年02期

6 馬新彥;鄧冰寧;;論懲罰性賠償?shù)膿p害填補功能——以美國侵權(quán)法懲罰性賠償制度為啟示的研究[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2012年03期

7 安東;;論法律的安全價值[J];法學評論;2012年03期

8 丁聲俊;;德國食品安全保障和食品風險防范措施[J];中國食物與營養(yǎng);2011年05期

9 孔東菊;;論懲罰性賠償在我國立法中的確立和完善——從《消費者權(quán)益保護法》到《侵權(quán)責任法》[J];法學雜志;2010年08期

10 周江洪;;懲罰性賠償責任的競合及其適用——《侵權(quán)責任法》第47條與《食品安全法》第96條第2款之適用關(guān)系[J];法學;2010年04期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 梁慧星;;消費者權(quán)益保護法第49條的解釋與適用[N];人民法院報;2001年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 張諾諾;懲罰性賠償制度研究[D];吉林大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1674641