我國公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度研究
本文選題:公務(wù)員 切入點:財產(chǎn)公開制度 出處:《上海大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度是世界上大多數(shù)國家廣為接受和實施的反腐敗制度,被譽為“陽光法案”和“終極反腐利器”。公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度強制要求特定職位的公務(wù)員申報和公開其財產(chǎn)狀況,通過保障社會公眾的知情權(quán)和監(jiān)督權(quán)的有效行使,從而實現(xiàn)對公務(wù)員公權(quán)力行為的監(jiān)督和制約。公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度具有推進依法行政、促進政府信息公開等功能,對于預(yù)防公務(wù)員腐敗、提高國家治理能力和治理體系現(xiàn)代化具有積極的意義。因此,本文的研究具有一定的理論價值和深刻的現(xiàn)實意義。 本文分為五部分來探討公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度的問題。第一部分主要介紹公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度的基礎(chǔ)概念,對公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度的特點和功能進行分析;第二部分主要從公法理論視角和國際法理論視角兩個方面,對公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度的理論基礎(chǔ)進行闡述;第三部分主要介紹我國現(xiàn)行公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度的現(xiàn)狀與問題,對現(xiàn)行財產(chǎn)公開法律制度的規(guī)范性法律文件和地方試點實踐情況進行分析,并對造成其實施困境的原因進行總結(jié);第四部分主要比較分析域外財產(chǎn)公開法律制度形成的歷史背景及其內(nèi)容,以期對完善我國財產(chǎn)公開法律制度的建設(shè)提供有效的借鑒和啟示。第五部分主要提出完善我國公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度的建議。本文認為,宜選擇“中央立法,地方授權(quán)”的立法路徑,,遵循誠實信用、普遍公開和問責(zé)等三大基本原則,應(yīng)從擴大財產(chǎn)公開的范圍、完善申報方式、建立監(jiān)督機制、增強法律懲罰等方面完善有關(guān)內(nèi)容,并建立健全相關(guān)的配套制度以保障公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公開法律制度的有效實施。
[Abstract]:The legal system of public property disclosure for civil servants is an anti-corruption regime widely accepted and implemented in most countries of the world, Known as the "Sunshine Act" and "the Ultimate Anti-Corruption weapon". The legal system of public servants' property disclosure requires civil servants in specific positions to declare and disclose their property status, by guaranteeing the public's right to know and the effective exercise of their supervisory power. So as to realize the supervision and restriction on the public power behavior of civil servants. The legal system of public property disclosure of civil servants has the functions of promoting administration according to law, promoting the publicity of government information, and preventing civil servants from corrupting. Therefore, the research of this paper has certain theoretical value and profound practical significance. This paper is divided into five parts to discuss the legal system of public property disclosure of civil servants. The first part mainly introduces the basic concept of the legal system of public property disclosure of civil servants, and analyzes the characteristics and functions of the legal system of property disclosure of civil servants. The second part mainly from the public law theory angle of view and the international law theory angle of view, to the civil servant property open legal system theory foundation to carry on the elaboration; The third part mainly introduces the current situation and problems of the current civil servant property disclosure legal system, and analyzes the normative legal documents and local pilot practice of the current property disclosure legal system. In the 4th part, the historical background and content of the legal system of property disclosure are compared and analyzed. In order to provide effective reference and enlightenment to the construction of the legal system of property disclosure in China. Part 5th mainly puts forward the suggestion of perfecting the legal system of property disclosure of civil servants in our country. The legislative path of local authorization, following the three basic principles of good faith, universal openness and accountability, should improve the relevant contents from the aspects of expanding the scope of property disclosure, perfecting the way of declaration, establishing a supervisory mechanism, strengthening legal punishment, etc. And establish and perfect the relevant supporting system to ensure the effective implementation of the civil servant property disclosure legal system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:上海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D922.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 姜明安;;論中國共產(chǎn)黨黨內(nèi)法規(guī)的性質(zhì)與作用[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年03期
2 沈瞿和;;公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)與有關(guān)事項報告公開的法律建構(gòu)[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期
3 陳麗影;陶銀球;;制度他律的實效性悖論——兼評《關(guān)于領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部報告?zhèn)人有關(guān)事項的規(guī)定》[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2012年02期
4 屠振宇;;財產(chǎn)申報制度中的隱私權(quán)保護[J];法商研究;2011年01期
5 李響;;試解制定《公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)申報法》的三大難題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年12期
6 鄒東升;財產(chǎn)申報循名責(zé)實:依據(jù)、缺失與重構(gòu)[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年03期
7 楊建國;;韓國官員財產(chǎn)申報法制化路徑分析與經(jīng)驗啟示[J];東北亞論壇;2013年04期
8 汪全勝;張們;;論我國官員財產(chǎn)申報立法的困境及路徑選擇[J];法學(xué)評論;2014年01期
9 劉中發(fā),楊軍玲;簡介臺灣《公職人員財產(chǎn)申報法》中的四大原則[J];河北法學(xué);1995年01期
10 譚世貴;宗會霞;;論我國財產(chǎn)申報制度的建立與實施[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2009年04期
本文編號:1617930
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1617930.html