本文選題：食品安全監(jiān)管　切入點(diǎn)：行政法律責(zé)任　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目前我國(guó)食品安全事故頻發(fā),屢禁不止,政府雖然加強(qiáng)了懲治力度,但成果依舊不太明顯。本文是在《食品安全法(修訂草案送審稿)》審議的過(guò)程中以及大部制改革對(duì)食品安全監(jiān)管部門(mén)的整合的基礎(chǔ)下寫(xiě)作的。本文主要以食品安全監(jiān)管為研究對(duì)象,通過(guò)行政法律責(zé)任理論,探尋食品安全監(jiān)管方面的行政法律責(zé)任,通過(guò)研究行政法律責(zé)任的追究現(xiàn)狀,反思其在現(xiàn)有制度層面上存在的問(wèn)題,結(jié)合食品安全監(jiān)管實(shí)際,提出完善意見(jiàn),目的在于通過(guò)行政法律責(zé)任制度的完善促進(jìn)食品安全行政法律責(zé)任追究效率的提高,從而為解決我國(guó)食品安全屢禁不止的現(xiàn)象找到新的突破口。 論文的第一章主要論述食品安全監(jiān)管行政法律責(zé)任理論基礎(chǔ)。首先,對(duì)食品安全的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行辨析。其次,主要論述了食品安全的監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。最后論述了食品安全監(jiān)管的行政法律責(zé)任理論。 論文的第二章主要論述了我國(guó)食品安全監(jiān)管行政法律責(zé)任的現(xiàn)狀,介紹了我國(guó)食品安全監(jiān)管不力的現(xiàn)狀、行政法律責(zé)任追究的現(xiàn)狀,分析了監(jiān)管不力的原因是行政法律責(zé)任追究機(jī)制的不完善,總結(jié)出我國(guó)食品安全監(jiān)管行政法律責(zé)任方面的問(wèn)題。 論文的第三章主要講述了美國(guó)、歐盟、日本食品安全監(jiān)管的立法規(guī)定、監(jiān)管現(xiàn)狀及行政法律責(zé)任追究情況,通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)外的食品安全監(jiān)管的了解,總結(jié)經(jīng)驗(yàn)和啟示。 論文的第四章主要論述了我國(guó)食品安全監(jiān)管行政法律責(zé)任追究機(jī)制的完善是解決食品安全問(wèn)題的關(guān)鍵,對(duì)行政法律責(zé)任追究機(jī)制的完善做了具體構(gòu)想。 論文的結(jié)語(yǔ),主要論述行政法律責(zé)任追究機(jī)制的完善是解決食品安全監(jiān)管不力的根本原因,完善行政法律責(zé)任制度能對(duì)食品安全屢禁不止起到遏制作用。
[Abstract]:At present, food safety accidents occur frequently in our country and are not prohibited. Although the government has strengthened its punishment, However, the results are still not obvious. This paper is written on the basis of the review of the Food Safety Law (revised draft) and the integration of the food safety supervision department by the reform of the Ministry of Food Safety. This paper is mainly written on the basis of food safety. Full supervision is the object of study. Through the theory of administrative legal responsibility, this paper explores the administrative legal responsibility of food safety supervision, through the study of the status quo of administrative legal responsibility, reflects on its existing problems in the existing system, and combines the actual situation of food safety supervision. The purpose of this paper is to improve the efficiency of the investigation of food safety administrative legal liability through the perfection of administrative legal liability system, and to find a new breakthrough for solving the phenomenon of repeated prohibition of food safety in our country. The first chapter mainly discusses the theoretical basis of the administrative legal responsibility of food safety supervision. First, the related concepts of food safety are analyzed. This paper mainly discusses the supervision standard of food safety, and finally discusses the theory of administrative legal responsibility of food safety supervision. The second chapter mainly discusses the current situation of the administrative legal responsibility of the food safety supervision in China, introduces the current situation of the inadequate food safety supervision in China, the current situation of the investigation of the administrative legal responsibility. This paper analyzes the reasons of the weak supervision is the imperfection of the investigation mechanism of the administrative legal responsibility, and summarizes the problems in the administrative legal liability of the food safety supervision in our country. The third chapter mainly describes the legislation of food safety supervision in the United States, the European Union and Japan, the current situation of supervision and the investigation of administrative legal liability, through the understanding of foreign food safety supervision, summed up the experience and inspiration. Chapter 4th of the paper mainly discusses the perfection of the mechanism of the investigation of the administrative legal responsibility for food safety supervision in China is the key to solve the problem of food safety, and makes a concrete conception on the perfection of the mechanism of the investigation of the administrative legal responsibility. The conclusion of the paper mainly discusses that the perfection of the investigation mechanism of administrative legal responsibility is the fundamental reason to solve the weak supervision of food safety. Perfecting the system of administrative legal responsibility can restrain food safety from repeated prohibitions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈巋;;食品免檢制之反思——以風(fēng)險(xiǎn)治理為視角[J];法商研究;2009年03期

2 周佑勇;論行政不作為的救濟(jì)和責(zé)任[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1997年04期

3 石佑啟;試析行政不作為的國(guó)家賠償責(zé)任[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1999年01期

4 張芳;論行政責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則的多元化[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

5 田思源;行政法律責(zé)任辨析[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1997年02期

6 劉松山;違法行政規(guī)范性文件之責(zé)任追究[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年04期

7 楊小君;怠于履行職責(zé)的國(guó)家賠償責(zé)任[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

8 賀思源;劉士國(guó);;論環(huán)境監(jiān)管失職致害的國(guó)家賠償責(zé)任[J];河北法學(xué);2013年12期

9 張賢明;政治責(zé)任與法律責(zé)任的比較分析[J];政治學(xué)研究;2000年01期

10 代清霞;淺析行政責(zé)任制度缺失[J];山東行政學(xué)院山東省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉錄民;我國(guó)食品安全監(jiān)管體系研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙世鵬;我國(guó)食品安全監(jiān)管責(zé)任追究機(jī)制研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1606348