本文選題：行政指導　切入點：司法救濟　出處：《大連海事大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：行政指導制度以其柔性的管理方法,被大多數(shù)國家廣泛運用,同時對社會的發(fā)展產生了積極的影響。在改革開放之初,我國的政府也看到了行政指導對社會發(fā)展的重要作用,但當時計劃經濟給社會造成不良的影響仍就存在,致使行政指導制度的發(fā)展一度比較緩慢。如今,改革開放已取得了巨大成果,經濟社會有了較大提高,但要想經濟社會能持續(xù)增長,也就需要我國加快法治化腳步,這就對政府管理水平要求會更高,現(xiàn)實要求政府在行政管理過程讓普通大眾廣泛參與進來。此時,我們的鄰居日本行政指導已經基本健全,行政指導在行政管理領域,尤其是經濟領域發(fā)揮了特殊的調整作用,其他國家也看到了該制度所具有的優(yōu)勢,也紛紛采納并運用該行政管理手段,都取得不錯的效果。當然,我國政府也進一步認識到行政指導制度的運用不能再遲緩,其靈活性和積極性一定能保證經濟社會的穩(wěn)步增長,要打破傳統(tǒng)思維,從2000年至今,我國中央政府機關紛紛出臺各種指導性文件,提倡地方政府在社會管理活動實施行政指導,在各領域都取得了良好的效果。 但是,我國行政指導制度在運用中還存在諸多的不足,產生行政指導爭議時常發(fā)生,與行政指導有關的糾紛也一時無法妥善解決,行政指導應有的作用無法發(fā)揮。行政指導的實施大多數(shù)以指導性文件為依據(jù),并沒有從立法上對其實體內容、程序步驟以及救濟方式予以確立。行政指導在實務中的負面問題,也引起了許多學者對行政指導的探究。行政指導的缺陷,一方面是由于行政指導制度的不完善,更重要的是對行政指導爭議缺乏有效的司法救濟途徑。無論是學術界,還是立法上,都對行政指導爭議是否給予司法救濟的途徑意見不統(tǒng)一。筆者嘗試論證行政指導爭議司法救濟的理論基礎和必要性,表明我國構建該制度完全是可行的。同時,總結行政指導制度實踐中的多方面問題,指出我國行政指導司法救濟現(xiàn)狀,在此基礎上表明給予行政指導爭議司法救濟制度的必要性和迫切性。最后,考察他國行政指導司法救濟的建立情況,研究可供借鑒的經驗,構建我國的行政指導爭議司法救濟體系,以保障相對人的合法權益,進一步實現(xiàn)法治行政。
[Abstract]:The administrative guidance system, with its flexible management method, is widely used in most countries and has a positive impact on the development of society. At the beginning of reform and opening up, our government also saw the important role of administrative guidance in social development. However, at that time, the planned economy had a negative impact on society, resulting in a relatively slow development of the administrative guidance system. Today, great achievements have been made in the reform and opening up, and the economy and society have been greatly improved. However, if we want to achieve sustained economic and social growth, we need our country to speed up the pace of rule of law. This will require a higher level of government management. The reality requires the government to involve the general public extensively in the administrative process. At this time, Our neighbor, Japan, has basically perfected its administrative guidance, which has played a special adjustment role in the field of administration, especially in the economic field. Other countries have also seen the advantages of this system. They have also adopted and used the administrative means one after another, and have achieved good results. Of course, our government has further realized that the application of the administrative guidance system cannot be delayed any longer, and that its flexibility and enthusiasm will surely ensure steady economic and social growth. In order to break the traditional thinking, from 2000 to now, the central government organs of our country have issued various guiding documents one after another, advocating the local government to carry out the administrative guidance in the social management activities, which has achieved good results in all fields. However, there are still many deficiencies in the application of the administrative guidance system in our country. Disputes about administrative guidance often occur, and disputes related to administrative guidance cannot be resolved properly for the time being. The implementation of administrative guidance is mostly based on the guiding documents, and does not establish its substantive content, procedural steps and relief methods from the legislative point of view, and the negative problems in the practice of the administrative guidance. The defects of the administrative guidance are due to the imperfection of the administrative guidance system and, more importantly, the lack of effective judicial remedies to the disputes over administrative guidance. The author tries to prove the theoretical basis and necessity of the judicial remedy of administrative guidance dispute, which indicates that it is completely feasible to construct this system in our country. This paper summarizes the various problems in the practice of administrative guidance system, points out the present situation of judicial relief of administrative guidance in China, and on this basis indicates the necessity and urgency of giving administrative guidance to dispute judicial relief system. This paper reviews the establishment of judicial relief under administrative guidance in other countries, studies the experiences that can be used for reference, and constructs the judicial relief system of administrative guidance disputes in our country in order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of relative persons and further realize the administration by law.
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1;D925.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊解君;中國入世與行政訴訟制度變革[J];法學;2002年04期

2 劉曉莉;;芻議行政指導救濟制度的完善[J];法制與社會;2009年25期

3 竇義;淺析我國行政指導的司法救濟[J];甘肅農業(yè);2005年03期

4 邢曉東;從行政權與司法權的關系看行政訴訟受案范圍[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2003年01期

5 包紅光;;我國行政指導司法救濟制度的構建[J];湖南科技學院學報;2010年03期

6 吳國干;行政指導與依法行政[J];國家行政學院學報;2001年04期

7 章志遠;行政指導新論[J];法學論壇;2005年05期

8 張杰;;法學視野下的行政指導問題分析[J];商丘師范學院學報;2008年07期

9 劉錚;試析行政指導的可訴性[J];山西高等學校社會科學學報;2002年03期

10 湛中樂;日本《行政程序法》立法背景探析[J];中外法學;1995年04期

，

本文編號：1606186