本文選題：指導性案例　切入點：鹽業(yè)體制改革　出處：從指導性案例5號魯濰案的影響與后續(xù)發(fā)展談起　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：指導性案例5號魯濰案自發(fā)布之日起便受到學界和實務界的廣泛關注。魯濰案一方面強調(diào)了法院對規(guī)章的有限審查權(quán),另一方面也體現(xiàn)了司法對于破除鹽業(yè)壟斷體制的推動作用。然而該案發(fā)布近五年來,其指導司法適用的情況與最高人民法院的預期頗有不同。盡管魯濰案對后續(xù)鹽業(yè)管理領域行政訴訟案件的審理產(chǎn)生了重大影響,但這種影響部分來自于對魯濰案裁判要點的遵循甚至超越,部分來自于法院對地方規(guī)定的變通解釋。鹽業(yè)行政主管部門對于魯濰案的判決也采取了相應的對策,執(zhí)法手段的變化使得該領域案件的討論已經(jīng)不再停留于魯濰案本身,而是牽涉到越來越多的法律問題,對魯濰案的適用提出了新的挑戰(zhàn),也導致工業(yè)鹽管理領域的管制即便在魯濰案發(fā)布之后仍以新的形式進行。這種現(xiàn)象是我國鹽業(yè)管理體制的內(nèi)在局限造成的,這也對我國目前正在進行的鹽業(yè)體制改革提出了新的啟示和要求。
[Abstract]:The guiding case No. 5, Luwei case, has received extensive attention from academic and practical circles since it was published. On the one hand, the Luwei case emphasizes the limited power of the court to review the regulations. On the other hand, it also reflects the role of the judiciary in breaking down the salt monopoly system. However, in the nearly five years since the case was published, Its guidance on judicial application is quite different from the expectations of the Supreme people's Court. Although the Luwei case has had a significant impact on the subsequent trials of administrative litigation cases in the field of salt industry management, However, this kind of influence comes from following and even surpassing the judgment points of Luwei case, and partly from the flexible interpretation of local regulations by the court. The salt industry administrative department has also taken corresponding countermeasures to the judgment in Luwei case. The change of law enforcement means makes the discussion of cases in this field no longer remain in the Luwei case itself, but involves more and more legal issues, which poses a new challenge to the application of the Luwei case. It also leads to new forms of regulation in the field of industrial salt management even after the publication of the Luwei case. This phenomenon is caused by the inherent limitations of the management system of China's salt industry. This also put forward new enlightenment and request to the salt industry system reform that our country is carrying on at present.
【作者單位】： 北京大學法學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“構(gòu)建中國特色案例制度的綜合系統(tǒng)研究”(項目編號:16ZDA068)的研究成果之一
【分類號】：D922.16;D920.5

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李瑰華;;指導性案例的概念之辨[J];西北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年03期

2 劉作翔;徐景和;;解讀指導性案例的適用技術(shù)[J];法制資訊;2011年05期

3 孫國祥;;從柔性參考到剛性參照的嬗變——以“兩高”指導性案例拘束力的規(guī)定為視角[J];南京大學學報(哲學.人文科學.社會科學版);2012年03期

4 資琳;;法治中國語境下指導性案例的分類適用[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2013年05期

5 王杏飛;;指導性案例的法哲學分析[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(漢文版);2007年06期

6 董v，

本文編號：1585859