本文選題：行政程序瑕疵　切入點：三分法　出處：《法學家》2017年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：在行政程序法典闕如的情形下,我國新《行政訴訟法》擔綱了規(guī)范行政程序瑕疵類型的重任。新法對行政程序瑕疵采取"違反法定程序"與"程序輕微違法"的二分法,忽略了司法實踐中大量存在的第三種類型:不被撤銷或確認違法,而是由法院予以指正并判決駁回訴訟請求的"狹義程序瑕疵"。在引入"狹義程序瑕疵"而形成三分法后,有必要在制度層面增設"忽略不計(視為合法)"的法律后果。同時,基于完善行政程序瑕疵的判決方式考慮,應排除撤銷判決中部分撤銷之適用、質疑責令重作判決不受限制之正當性、反對增設補正判決作為確認違法判決之從判決,還應防止法院因寬泛認定"狹義程序瑕疵"而大量作出駁回訴訟請求判決的現(xiàn)象。為此,應以"違反程度輕微且行政機關自行實施了有意義的補正"作為適用駁回判決的前提。
[Abstract]:In the absence of a code of administrative procedure, the new Administrative procedure Law of our country is responsible for standardizing the types of defects in administrative procedure. The new law adopts a dichotomy of "violating the legal procedure" and "the minor violation of the procedure". Neglecting the third type which exists extensively in judicial practice: the "narrow procedural defect", which is not revoked or recognized as illegal, but is corrected by the court and decided to reject the claim. After the introduction of the "narrow procedural defect" and the formation of the three-point law, It is necessary to add the legal consequences of "ignoring (considered as legal)" at the system level. At the same time, considering the judgment mode of perfecting the defects of administrative procedure, we should exclude the application of partial revocation in the annulment. To challenge the validity of ordering a new judgment to be repeated without restriction, to oppose the addition of a correction judgment as a subordinate judgment to confirm an illegal judgment, and to prevent the court from making a large number of judgments for rejecting a lawsuit request because of its broad determination of a "narrow procedural flaw". To this end, "minor violations and the agency's own implementation of meaningful corrections" should be taken as a prerequisite for the application of the decision.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學法學院;
【基金】：中荷合作項目“中國行政訴訟制度改革的理論與實踐”(106-239067)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D922.1
，

本文編號：1580305