本文關鍵詞： 質量技術監(jiān)督 行政執(zhí)法 自由裁量權 控制　出處：《內蒙古大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：近年來,假冒偽劣等產(chǎn)品質量違法行為層出不窮,雖經(jīng)嚴厲打擊,但仍然如百足之蟲死而不僵,產(chǎn)品質量違法行為在國際上嚴重影響國家形象,在國內給人民群眾帶來人身或財產(chǎn)損失,同時也嚴重擾亂了社會經(jīng)濟秩序。質量技術監(jiān)督部門作為生產(chǎn)領域產(chǎn)品質量安全的監(jiān)管部門,肩負著從源頭查處產(chǎn)品質量違法行為的重要使命,行使著法律賦予的對產(chǎn)品質量違法行為進行處罰的行政權力。因此,行政處罰權構成質量技術監(jiān)督部門行政執(zhí)法權的核心內容。更為重要的是,行政處罰自由裁量權的合理運用有利于提高行政效率,體現(xiàn)具體行政行為的合理性,但如果不當行使又會極大損害行政相對人的合法權益,滋生腐敗,甚至影響國家的長治久安。 一直以來對行政處罰自由裁量權的研究都是行政法學界的重要課題之一,質量技術監(jiān)督部門作為從源頭查處產(chǎn)品質量違法行為主要部門,行政處罰自由裁量權的行使貫穿于其工作的始終,筆者作為一名長期在質量技術監(jiān)督工作一線從事行政執(zhí)法的工作人員,深刻體會到正確行使自由裁量權對質量技術監(jiān)督部門有效履行執(zhí)法職能的積極意義和不合理行使自由裁量權的危害�；诖�,筆者擬結合在工作中查處行政違法行為的實際案例,從立法方面、程序方面、法律應用方面以及質監(jiān)部門內部職能架構方面就質監(jiān)部門查處產(chǎn)品質量違法行為過程中行使行政處罰自由裁量權提出自己的觀點和看法。
[Abstract]:In recent years, fake and shoddy and other product quality violations emerge one after another, although through severe punishment, but still like a hundred foot worm death and not stiff, product quality violations in the international seriously affect the image of the country. At the same time, it has seriously disturbed the social and economic order. The quality and technical supervision department is the supervision department of product quality and safety in the field of production. Shoulder from the source of the product quality violations of the important mission, exercise the law to punish the product quality violations of the administrative power. The administrative punishment power constitutes the core content of the administrative law enforcement power of the quality and technical supervision department. More importantly, the rational application of the administrative penalty discretion is conducive to improving the administrative efficiency and reflecting the rationality of the specific administrative behavior. However, improper exercise will greatly damage the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, breed corruption, and even affect the long-term stability of the country. All along, the research on the discretion of administrative punishment is one of the important topics in the field of administrative law. The quality and technical supervision department is the main department to investigate and deal with the illegal acts of product quality from the source. The exercise of the discretion of administrative punishment throughout its work, the author as a long-term quality and technical supervision in the first line of administrative law enforcement staff. Deeply understand the positive significance of the correct exercise of discretion to the quality and technical supervision departments to effectively perform the law enforcement function and the harm of unreasonable exercise of discretion. Based on this. The author intends to investigate and deal with the actual cases of administrative illegal acts in the work, from the legislative aspects, procedural aspects. In the aspect of law application and internal functional structure of quality supervision department, the author puts forward his own views and opinions on exercising the discretion of administrative punishment in the process of investigating and punishing illegal acts of product quality by quality supervision department.
【學位授予單位】：內蒙古大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 胡亞球,陳迎;論行政自由裁量權的司法控制[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);2001年04期

2 肖玲莉;;論對我國行政自由裁量權法律控制的路徑[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2009年08期

3 姜明安;;論行政自由裁量權及其法律控制[J];法學研究;1993年01期

4 余凌云;;游走在規(guī)范與僵化之間——對金華行政裁量基準實踐的思考[J];清華法學;2008年03期

5 余凌云;;對行政裁量立法控制的疲軟——一個實例的驗證[J];法學論壇;2009年05期

6 趙永行;行政權力運行與行政程序[J];現(xiàn)代法學;1999年03期

7 于麗平;穆麗霞;;探究行政自由裁量權[J];行政法學研究;2007年02期

8 周佑勇;;裁量基準的正當性問題研究[J];中國法學;2007年06期

，

本文編號：1481347