本文關(guān)鍵詞： “紅頭文件” 抽象行政行為 可訴性 制度構(gòu)想　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：雖然隨著國(guó)家法制建設(shè),行政立法也在不斷的完善,但仍然不能滿足經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展的需要,“紅頭文件”在某種程度上補(bǔ)充了行政立法滯后于社會(huì)發(fā)展的不足,其以“準(zhǔn)法律”的角色在行政管理社會(huì)生活當(dāng)中發(fā)揮著積極有效的作用。但是,由于司法監(jiān)督一直處于空白狀態(tài),而“紅頭文件"的制定和管理也沒(méi)有一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的制度和相關(guān)的監(jiān)督審查機(jī)制,從而使得制定的“紅頭文件”混亂無(wú)章甚至違法違規(guī),致使“紅頭文件”走上畸形發(fā)展之路。為了更好地保護(hù)公民的合法權(quán)益,及時(shí)有效的給予司法救濟(jì),對(duì)“紅頭文件"的司法監(jiān)督勢(shì)在必行。雖然抽象行政行為整體可訴還有待商榷,但是將抽象行政行為當(dāng)中表現(xiàn)最為突出的“紅頭文件”率先納入到行政訴訟范圍內(nèi),讓法律規(guī)制“紅頭文件"制定管理的亂象,并在“紅頭文件"侵犯到利害關(guān)系人權(quán)益的時(shí)候給予及時(shí)有效的司法救濟(jì)。更深層次的講,“紅頭文件”的可訴性不突破,抽象行政行為的可訴即無(wú)從談起,依法行政、依法治國(guó)就更是無(wú)稽之談。本文內(nèi)容主要分為五大部分：第一部分為緒論,主要交代選題的背景以及研究意義以及國(guó)內(nèi)對(duì)“紅頭文件”和抽象行政行為的研究現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展方向,明確研究目的、理清研究思路；第二部分主要對(duì)“紅頭文件”的基本概念、歷史淵源、發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀、性質(zhì)內(nèi)涵等進(jìn)行細(xì)致的論述,以及對(duì)“紅頭文件”的上位概念抽象行政行為做簡(jiǎn)要概述并理清“紅頭文件”與抽象行政行為之間的關(guān)系,以求對(duì)“紅頭文件"有一個(gè)更為全面的認(rèn)識(shí)和理解,同時(shí)提出在“紅頭文件"規(guī)范化過(guò)程當(dāng)中眾多監(jiān)督審查中的司法審查,進(jìn)一步縮小范圍,以求細(xì)致深刻,為下文論述做好鋪墊；第三部分由第二部分的對(duì)“紅頭文件"的司法審查引入,引出其可訴的必要性和可行性,并詳加論述；第四部分主要從域外相關(guān)制度的研究與借鑒,結(jié)合抽象行政行為可訴性理論進(jìn)程,為下文的制度構(gòu)想提供理論和實(shí)踐的基礎(chǔ)；第五部分的主要論述“紅頭文件”作為抽象行政行為納入行政訴訟范圍后,以受案范圍與管轄、當(dāng)事人、證據(jù)與舉證責(zé)任、裁判與執(zhí)行以及責(zé)任追究與救濟(jì)為代表的一些制度構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:Although with the construction of the national legal system, the administrative legislation is constantly improving, but still can not meet the needs of economic and social development, "Red document" to some extent complements the administrative legislation lagging behind the social development of the insufficiency. It plays an active and effective role in the social life of administration with the role of "quasi-law". However, judicial supervision has been in a blank state. However, the formulation and management of "red head document" also does not have a unified system and relevant supervision and examination mechanism, thus making the "red head document" in confusion and no chapter or even violating the law. In order to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, timely and effective judicial relief is given. The judicial supervision of "red head document" is imperative. Although the abstract administrative act can be sued as a whole, it is still open to question. However, the most outstanding "red head document", which is the most outstanding in abstract administrative act, is brought into the scope of administrative litigation first, and the disorder of "red head document" formulation and management is regulated by law. And in the "redhead document" infringement of the rights and interests of interested parties to give timely and effective judicial relief. Further, the "redhead document" can not break through the actionable, abstract administrative action can not be heard. Administration by law, the rule of law is nonsense. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is an introduction. It mainly explains the background and significance of the topic, the present situation and development direction of the domestic research on "red head document" and abstract administrative behavior, clarifies the purpose of the research, and clarifies the research ideas. The second part mainly discusses the basic concept, historical origin, development status, nature connotation and so on of "Red head document". As well as a brief summary of the upper concept of "red head document" abstract administrative behavior and clarify the relationship between "red head document" and abstract administrative act, in order to have a more comprehensive understanding and understanding of "red head document". At the same time, the author puts forward the judicial review in the process of standardization of "red head document", which can further narrow down the scope, in order to be careful and profound, and pave the way for the following discussion; The third part is introduced by the second part of the judicial review of "Red head document", leading to the necessity and feasibility of its actionable, and discussed in detail. The 4th part mainly from the extraterritorial relevant system research and the reference, unifies the abstract administrative action litigability theory process, provides the theory and the practice foundation for the following system idea; Part 5th mainly discusses the "red head document" as an abstract administrative act into the scope of administrative proceedings, to accept the scope and jurisdiction of the case, the parties, evidence and burden of proof. Judgment and enforcement, as well as accountability and relief represented by some system ideas.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 武芳;;論行政規(guī)范性文件的監(jiān)督途徑[J];湖北工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年01期

2 江凌;;政府法制監(jiān)督:歷史與現(xiàn)狀[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2014年03期

3 楊書(shū)軍;;規(guī)范性文件制定程序立法的現(xiàn)狀及完善[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2013年02期

4 劉文怡;劉永紅;;依法行政與法治政府建設(shè)問(wèn)題探討[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(漢文哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

5 方世榮;;論我國(guó)行政訴訟受案范圍的局限性及其改進(jìn)[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2012年02期

6 孔繁華;;行政規(guī)范性文件法律監(jiān)督機(jī)制探究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年07期

7 趙愛(ài)娟;;“紅頭文件”的內(nèi)涵及其界定[J];泰山鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)職工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

8 李秀勤;;我國(guó)紅頭文件現(xiàn)狀分析[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2010年11期

9 劉可嘉;;對(duì)行政規(guī)范性文件進(jìn)行有效監(jiān)督的路徑探討[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年14期

10 鄭旭輝;;論行政規(guī)范性文件體系的缺失與規(guī)范[J];西安電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1473686