天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁(yè) > 法律論文 > 行政法論文 >

農(nóng)村房屋買賣法律問(wèn)題研究

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-01-26 10:52

  本文關(guān)鍵詞: 農(nóng)村 房屋買賣 合同效力 完善 出處:《山東大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文


【摘要】:在高房?jī)r(jià)推動(dòng)下,農(nóng)村房屋交易火爆異常。城鄉(xiāng)二元結(jié)構(gòu)下的農(nóng)村房屋價(jià)格低廉,正吸引著不堪重壓的城市人移居鄉(xiāng)野;另一方,在城市化中成長(zhǎng)起來(lái)的新農(nóng)民,因教育、工作等原因,選擇到城市謀求未來(lái),家中閑置的房屋也自然成為其走向城市的重要砝碼。然而,本是各取所需的局面,正在被不斷爆發(fā)的農(nóng)村房屋買賣糾紛所摧毀。房屋因拆遷所帶來(lái)的巨大利益,讓一部分賣房者反悔,告上法庭,要求確認(rèn)農(nóng)村房屋買賣合同無(wú)效。雖然這類案件在大量的訴至法院,但是我國(guó)法律對(duì)農(nóng)村房屋買賣合同的效力卻沒有明確的規(guī)定,因此司法實(shí)踐者在處理該案件時(shí)只能在適用法律的過(guò)程中不斷的推敲、摸索前進(jìn)。由于每個(gè)人對(duì)法律的理解千差萬(wàn)別、對(duì)法律的觀點(diǎn)亦見仁見智。因此,農(nóng)村房屋買賣合同效力的認(rèn)定,不同地區(qū)的法院甚至同一法院內(nèi)部也會(huì)作出不同的裁判。同案不同判的現(xiàn)象不但無(wú)法起到定紛止?fàn)幍淖饔?反而會(huì)損害司法的權(quán)威,造成負(fù)面影響。本文從分析農(nóng)村房屋買賣糾紛的類型及特點(diǎn)出發(fā),探究相關(guān)理論,并從立法規(guī)定與實(shí)踐著手,考察我國(guó)農(nóng)村房屋買賣的現(xiàn)狀,發(fā)現(xiàn)問(wèn)題,并提出完善的思路和對(duì)策。因此本文分為以下五個(gè)部分: 第一部分描述我國(guó)農(nóng)村房屋買賣及農(nóng)村房屋買賣合同的概念,農(nóng)村房屋買賣合同就是出賣人轉(zhuǎn)移農(nóng)村房屋的所有權(quán)于買受人,買受人支付價(jià)款的合同。從概念出發(fā)結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中的典型案件引出糾紛的類型并分析其特征,本文討論的糾紛類型主要是針對(duì)農(nóng)村房屋買受人為集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織以外的成員,包括外村村民和城鎮(zhèn)居民。由于農(nóng)村房屋買賣標(biāo)的物及買賣雙方當(dāng)事人身份的特殊性,其與普通的買賣合同不同,有其獨(dú)特的特點(diǎn)。 第二部分是對(duì)我國(guó)農(nóng)村房屋買賣理論的探究,在理論界對(duì)農(nóng)村房屋買賣的相關(guān)問(wèn)題爭(zhēng)論很大,可謂百家爭(zhēng)鳴。本文主要涉及與農(nóng)村房屋買賣合同效力密切相關(guān)的三個(gè)問(wèn)題,房屋與土地的產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)問(wèn)題、房屋與土地的關(guān)系問(wèn)題及房屋登記及合同效力的關(guān)系問(wèn)題。由于我國(guó)房屋與土地分屬于不同的所有權(quán)主體,且房屋與土地不是主從物關(guān)系,在房屋與土地轉(zhuǎn)讓的過(guò)程中究竟如何運(yùn)用房地一體原則,理論界存在很大的爭(zhēng)議。房屋登記與房屋買賣合同的效力之間的關(guān)系,涉及到農(nóng)村房屋買賣合同什么時(shí)間成立并生效,更涉及到權(quán)利行使的時(shí)間。 第三部分是對(duì)我國(guó)農(nóng)村房屋買賣的現(xiàn)行制度考察,主要是從分析立法規(guī)定、行政規(guī)定及司法解釋相關(guān)規(guī)定的不足之處,并結(jié)合分析我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中在援引法律裁判案件時(shí)存在的困惑及裁判結(jié)果的五花八門,從而得出本問(wèn)題的癥結(jié)所在。由于我國(guó)法律規(guī)定的過(guò)于原則,在司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)該問(wèn)題的裁判結(jié)果過(guò)于混亂,結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中的一個(gè)案例,援引《中華人民共和國(guó)土地管理法》第六十二條第四款和第六十三條,結(jié)果的差距,說(shuō)明了該問(wèn)題在現(xiàn)行司法實(shí)踐中的困惑程度,進(jìn)一步體現(xiàn)了解決該問(wèn)題的緊迫性。 第四部分是分析司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)農(nóng)村房屋買賣的困惑。司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)該問(wèn)題主要存在無(wú)效說(shuō)和有效說(shuō)兩種觀點(diǎn),在分析這兩種觀點(diǎn)的利弊的基礎(chǔ)上,重點(diǎn)解析了無(wú)效說(shuō)對(duì)該問(wèn)題的法律后果的不能全面處理之處。合同無(wú)效之后的法律后果是顯而易見的,但是無(wú)效說(shuō)卻不能妥善解決該類問(wèn)題,并且確認(rèn)合同無(wú)效進(jìn)一步增加了道德危機(jī)對(duì)社會(huì)倫理所帶來(lái)一系列困惑和危機(jī)。 第五部分是完善農(nóng)村房屋買賣的思路與對(duì)策,提出本文支持有效說(shuō)的理由,并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出完善我國(guó)農(nóng)村房屋買賣的思路,并列舉出具體的對(duì)策。首先從立法上完善,其次是轉(zhuǎn)變宅基地限制流轉(zhuǎn)的觀念,從農(nóng)村宅基地的取得、流轉(zhuǎn)、登記等環(huán)節(jié)細(xì)節(jié)入手,逐步弱化土地的保障功能,使宅基地從限制流傳的環(huán)節(jié)中解脫出來(lái),進(jìn)一步發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的功能。在允許農(nóng)村房屋買賣的前提下,為解決我國(guó)的宅基地使用權(quán)問(wèn)題,引進(jìn)了“法定租賃權(quán)”的概念。 農(nóng)村房屋涉及到農(nóng)民基本生存的權(quán)利,如何保障農(nóng)民的基本權(quán)利,是我國(guó)“三農(nóng)”問(wèn)題必須要面對(duì)和解決的重要課題,這也是司法制度的完善和司法權(quán)威的保障。
[Abstract]:In this paper , the author analyzes the types and characteristics of the rural housing purchase and sale contract , and asks for confirmation that the contract of rural house purchase and sale is invalid . The first part describes the concept of rural house purchase and sale contract in our country , and the contract of rural house purchase and sale is the contract for the seller to transfer the ownership of the rural housing to the buyer and the buyer to pay the price . The second part is the study of the theory of rural house purchase and sale in our country . There are three problems about the relationship between the property rights structure of the house and the land , the relation between the house and the land , the relation between the house and the land , the relationship between the house registration and the contract effect . The third part is to study the current system of the rural house purchase and sale in our country , mainly from the analysis of the deficiencies of the legislative provisions , administrative regulations and judicial interpretation , and combining with the analysis of the confusion of the judicial practice in the judicial practice and the result of the referee ' s five - eight door , which leads to the crux of the problem . As a result of the overconfusing judgment result in the judicial practice , and the result of the judicial practice , the author invokes Article 62 ( 4 ) and 63 ( 63 ) of the Law of the People ' s Republic of China on the degree of confusion in the current judicial practice , and further reflects the urgency of solving the problem . The fourth part is to analyze the confusion of the rural housing sale in the judicial practice . In the judicial practice , there are two kinds of views which are invalid and effective . On the basis of the analysis of the pros and cons of the two views , the author mainly analyzes the non - comprehensive treatment of the legal consequences of the problem . The legal consequences after the contract are null and void are obvious , but the ineffective theory cannot solve the problem properly , and it is confirmed that the contract is null and void , which further increases the series of confusion and crisis caused by the moral crisis to the social ethics . The fifth part is to improve the thought and the countermeasure of the rural house purchase and sale , put forward the reason why this article supports the effective theory , and then put forward the idea of improving the rural housing sale in our country , and put forward the concrete countermeasure . First , the legislation is perfected , secondly , the transformation of the idea of restricting the circulation of the house base , gradually weaken the security function of the land , make the house base move out from the restricted circulation , further exert its due function . In order to solve the problem of the land use right of our country , the concept of " legal tenancy right " is introduced in order to solve the problem of the land use right of our country . The rural housing involves the right of the peasants to live basically , how to guarantee the basic rights of the peasants , is the important subject that the problem of the " three peasants " in our country must face and solve , which is also the perfection of the judicial system and the guarantee of judicial authority .

【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:D922.3;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王平達(dá);韓學(xué)平;;活躍農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)市場(chǎng)的路徑選擇——以農(nóng)村社會(huì)保障法律制度的構(gòu)建為基礎(chǔ)[J];商業(yè)研究;2009年03期

2 郭陽(yáng)旭;;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中社保功能體現(xiàn)與補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)計(jì)算研究[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(西部論壇);2008年04期

3 趙忠君;;農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)問(wèn)題探析[J];國(guó)土資源科技管理;2010年03期

4 應(yīng)秀良;;農(nóng)村房屋買賣合同效力辨析[J];法律適用;2009年07期

5 趙玉東;;“房地一體”原則在農(nóng)房權(quán)屬糾紛中的司法適用[J];法律適用;2012年06期

6 鞠海亭;鄭文平;;溫州農(nóng)村房屋買賣糾紛案件的調(diào)查與思考[J];法治研究;2011年03期

7 許瑜華;;農(nóng)村宅基地房屋買賣糾紛的司法抉擇[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

8 吳昌寧;馮淼;;農(nóng)村房屋買賣的法律困境及其對(duì)策[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2009年02期

9 陳亞菁;;地役權(quán)與抵押權(quán)并存的法律分析[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2009年07期

10 周玲玲;;同一集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織成員間房屋買賣問(wèn)題研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年36期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 唐勇輝;農(nóng)村房屋買賣法律問(wèn)題探析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 李勇;宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)法律問(wèn)題研究[D];河北大學(xué);2011年

3 彭思遠(yuǎn);我國(guó)農(nóng)村土地法律關(guān)系若干問(wèn)題分析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

4 金冠;農(nóng)村房屋買賣的法律問(wèn)題研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2010年

5 張行;我國(guó)農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)問(wèn)題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

6 艾淵源;我國(guó)農(nóng)村房屋買賣法律問(wèn)題研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2010年

,

本文編號(hào):1465403

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1465403.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶b6f09***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com