本文關(guān)鍵詞： 終身禁止 行政處罰 類型化　出處：《蘇州大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：面對紛繁復雜的執(zhí)法環(huán)境，執(zhí)法者創(chuàng)制著各種新型的政府規(guī)制手段，終身禁止便作為其中之一進入了我們的視野。在以《道路交通法》《娛樂場所管理條例》《教師法》等為代表，涉及公共安全、行業(yè)秩序、資格管理等的不同領(lǐng)域，均有“終身禁止”類規(guī)定的身影。從日益增多的終身禁駕、終身禁足、終身禁考處罰中，行政機關(guān)對于該類行政手段的認可度可見一斑。固然，終身禁止在關(guān)乎國民生命安全、行業(yè)秩序之維護等高危領(lǐng)域，將重大違法行為者徹底拒之門外、斬斷再行違法之可能性，起著無可比擬的作用。然而，法律依據(jù)的缺位、形式要件的粗糙及程序規(guī)定的欠缺，，均暴露了該治理手段在立法和實踐層面的混亂。筆者將存在該類規(guī)定的現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)范，以所欲保護的法益為依據(jù)進行梳理。進而盡可能對當下不同形式的終身禁止處罰予以分門別類，與此同時對當下學界與司法界傳統(tǒng)的行政處罰種類提出了質(zhì)疑，并提出了自己的分類。文中，筆者從憲法職業(yè)自由的角度出發(fā)，闡釋了終身禁止手段的不當運用將會對公民的基本憲法權(quán)利造成何等嚴重的損害。最終，回歸到法律控制面向，呼吁從實體、程序兩方面對該手段予以有效、審慎的規(guī)制。
[Abstract]:Facing the complicated law enforcement environment, law enforcers create a variety of new means of government regulation. As one of them, lifelong prohibition has entered our field of vision. It involves public safety and trade order, as represented by "Road Traffic Law", "regulations on the Management of Entertainment places", "teacher's Law" and so on. Qualifications management in different areas, there are "lifelong prohibition" of the type of figure. From the increasing lifetime ban, lifelong ban, lifelong ban on punishment. The recognition of this kind of administrative means can be seen in the administrative organs. Of course, lifelong prohibition in high-risk areas, such as the safety of the national life, the maintenance of trade order, will completely shut out the major illegal acts. The possibility of breaking the law again plays an unparalleled role. However, the absence of legal basis, the roughness of formal elements and the lack of procedural provisions. This means of governance in the legislative and practical level of confusion. The author will have this kind of provisions of the existing legal norms. In order to protect the legal interests as the basis for combing, and then as far as possible to the current forms of life-long prohibition punishment to be classified into categories, at the same time the academic and judicial circles of the current traditional types of administrative penalties have been questioned. And put forward their own classification. In this paper, the author from the perspective of constitutional freedom of occupation, explained how the improper use of life-long prohibition means will cause serious damage to the basic constitutional rights of citizens. Finally. Returning to legal control, it calls for effective and prudent regulation of this method from substantive and procedural aspects.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 歐陽海燕;;2011中國人信用大調(diào)查:誠信危機刺痛中國[J];小康;2011年08期

2 徐海燕;;公共利益與拆遷補償:從重慶最牛“釘子戶”案看《物權(quán)法》第42條的解釋[J];法學評論;2007年04期

3 石佑啟;行政聽證筆錄的法律效力分析[J];法學;2004年04期

4 朱芒;行政處罰聽證制度的功能——以上海聽證制度的實施現(xiàn)狀為例[J];法學研究;2003年05期

5 胡建淼;"其他行政處罰"若干問題研究[J];法學研究;2005年01期

6 萬毅,林喜芬;從“無理”的判決到判決書“說理”——判決書說理制度的正當性分析[J];法學論壇;2004年05期

7 章志遠;鮑燕嬌;;公布違法事實的法律屬性分析[J];山東警察學院學報;2011年06期

8 張學慧;譚紅;游文麗;;論選擇職業(yè)自由[J];同濟大學學報(社會科學版);2008年06期

9 孔慶晶;李海平;;我國行政聽證制度之探析[J];中國市場;2011年44期

10 楊登峰;;越權(quán)立法的認定與處理[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2006年03期

本文編號：1453708