【摘要】：我國各次修訂的《刑法》中都將"謀取不正當(dāng)利益"作為行賄罪判定的必備條件,但其在主動行賄和被動行賄中所處的地位和作用不盡相同;根據(jù)司法實踐經(jīng)驗,"謀取不正當(dāng)利益"是主動行賄行為的主觀要件,是被動行賄行為的客觀要件;由此給司法實踐帶來了一定的困難,并引起了學(xué)術(shù)界刑法領(lǐng)域?qū)W者及司法機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)部關(guān)于其去留問題的討論。在筆者看來,應(yīng)區(qū)分主動行賄還是被動行賄采取不同的立場,在主動行賄中不應(yīng)將"謀取不正當(dāng)利益"作為必備條件。
[Abstract]:In each revised Criminal Law of our country, "seeking improper interests" is regarded as the necessary condition for judging the crime of bribery, but its position and function in active bribery and passive bribery are not the same. According to the experience of judicial practice, "seeking improper interests" is the subjective element of active bribery and the objective element of passive bribery. This has brought some difficulties to the judicial practice, and caused the academic scholars in the field of criminal law and the judicial organs to discuss its fate. In the author's view, we should take different positions between active bribery and passive bribery, and should not take "seeking improper interests" as a necessary condition in active bribery.
【作者單位】： 湘潭大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D924.392
，

本文編號：2477550