【摘要】：吳甲、吳乙利用P2P網(wǎng)貸集資詐騙案的定性存在較大的爭(zhēng)議,主要體現(xiàn)在兩被告人構(gòu)成非法吸收公眾存款罪、詐騙罪還是集資詐騙罪。通過(guò)對(duì)案件爭(zhēng)議點(diǎn)的法律分析可知：非法吸收公眾存款罪與集資詐騙罪認(rèn)定的關(guān)鍵在于非法占有目的；詐騙罪和集資詐騙罪認(rèn)定的關(guān)鍵在于集資行為。從兩罪之間的關(guān)鍵構(gòu)成要件來(lái)論證兩被告人不構(gòu)成非法吸收公眾存款罪和詐騙罪；從犯罪構(gòu)成四要件來(lái)論證兩被告人構(gòu)成集資詐騙罪。具體論證如下：第一,兩被告人具有非法占有目的不構(gòu)成非法吸收公眾存款罪。首先明確非法占有目的之認(rèn)定方法：非法占有目的認(rèn)定的推定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為司法解釋,具體認(rèn)定非法占有目的時(shí)應(yīng)容許反證,并且結(jié)合其內(nèi)涵來(lái)驗(yàn)證推定和反證。其次再根據(jù)上述方法來(lái)認(rèn)定兩被告人具有非法占有目的。第二,兩被告人實(shí)施了非法集資行為不構(gòu)成詐騙罪。首先,兩被告人設(shè)立P2P網(wǎng)貸平臺(tái)融資即實(shí)施了集資行為,其后兩被告人利用異化的P2P網(wǎng)貸融資的行為符合利誘性和非法性要素系非法集資行為。第三,兩被告人構(gòu)成集資詐騙罪。兩被告人符合集資詐騙罪的犯罪構(gòu)成四要件：主體為自然人；主觀方面系直接故意,且具有非法占有目的；客體上既破壞了國(guó)家金融管理秩序又侵犯了公私財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)；客觀方面表現(xiàn)為詐騙行為和非法集資行為。
[Abstract]:Wu A and Wu B use the P2P online loan to raise the quality of the fraud case, which is mainly reflected in the crime of illegal absorption of public deposit, fraud and the crime of fund-raising for the two defendants. Through the legal analysis of the dispute point of the case, it is clear that the key to the identification of the crime of illegal absorption of the public deposit and the crime of raising the fund-raising fraud is the purpose of illegal possession; the key to the determination of the crime of fraud and the crime of fund-raising fraud is to raise the fund-raising behavior. It is proved that the two defendants do not constitute the crime of illegal absorption of public deposits and the crime of swindling. The specific argument is as follows: First, the illegal possession of the two defendants does not constitute the crime of illegal absorption of public deposits. First, it is clear that the method of the determination of the purpose of illegal possession: the presumption of the purpose of illegal possession is the judicial interpretation, the purpose of the illegal possession should be allowed to be reversed, and the presumption and contraindication should be verified in combination with its connotation. Secondly, according to the above-mentioned method, it is found that the two accused have the purpose of illegal possession. Secondly, the illegal fund-raising of the two defendants does not constitute a crime of fraud. First, the two accused set up the P2P network loan platform to finance the fund-raising behavior, and then the two defendants use the dissimilatory P2P network loan to finance the behavior, which is in accordance with the illegal fund-raising behavior of the inducing and illegal elements. Third, the two accused constitute a crime of fund-raising and fraud. The two defendants are in accordance with the four elements of the crime of capital-raising fraud: the subject is a natural person; the subjective aspect is the direct intention and has the purpose of illegal possession; the object not only destroys the state financial management order but also violates the public-private property right; The objective aspect is the act of fraud and the illegal fund-raising.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3;D920.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 欒曉麗,劉新艷;論集資詐騙罪中“非法占有目的”的若干問(wèn)題[J];和田師范專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

2 邵芳;;論集資詐騙罪的認(rèn)定[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2008年04期

3 劉慧卓;王一民;;非法吸收公眾存款罪與集資詐騙罪的區(qū)別[J];人民司法;2010年12期

4 張建;俞小海;;集資詐騙罪對(duì)象研究中的認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū)及其辨正[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2011年06期

5 張建;俞小海;;集資詐騙罪對(duì)象研究中的認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū)及其辨正[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2011年09期

6 沈燕;;集資詐騙罪與詐騙罪的區(qū)別——如何理解集資詐騙行為的公開(kāi)性、社會(huì)性特征[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2012年S4期

7 陜報(bào);;集資詐騙罪有哪些特征[J];農(nóng)村新技術(shù);2012年09期

8 馮嘉敏;李q，

本文編號(hào)：2464614