【摘要】：自刑法修正案八頒布以來,關于“毒駕”入刑的研究就一直就比較活躍。2015年11月1日起施行的刑法修正案九雖然擴展了危險駕駛罪的內容,但是人民群眾以及學者反響比較強烈的“毒駕”入刑仍然沒有實現。這又一次在學界引起了一陣討論的熱潮,一時間關于“毒駕”是否入刑的爭論在學界此起彼伏。本文的第一章旨在界定“毒駕”的清晰含義。通過將“毒駕”行為拆解為三個部分:吸毒行為、駕駛行為以及吸毒行為對駕駛行為的影響。并且分別對這三個部分進行理論上的探討和定義,本文最終給出的“毒駕”行為的定義是:所謂“毒駕”是指行為人在攝入國家規(guī)定的管制的麻醉藥品和精神藥品之后,在藥品的藥理作用下,基于運行機動車的意圖自主發(fā)動機動車的引擎或者實際運行機動車的行為。本文的第二章首先介紹了目前學界關于“毒駕”是否應該入刑的兩種學說,即“否定說”和“肯定說”�！胺穸ㄕf”反對“毒駕”行為入刑,其主要理由有:“毒駕”入刑違反了刑法的謙抑性原則、“毒駕”入刑違反了刑法的罪刑法定原則、“毒駕”入刑后難以保證司法的公平認定與執(zhí)行。而“肯定說”針對“否定說”的觀點提出了相反的意見。本文最后贊同“肯定說”的觀點,認為“毒駕”行為應該入刑。隨后,在支持“肯定說”的基礎上,本文再次強調了“毒駕”入刑在我國的必要性和可行性。本文的第三章在前文論述的基礎之上,并借鑒域外國家的立法經驗,給出了自己對“毒駕”入刑的立法構想。主要從我國“毒駕”入刑的入刑標準和罪名設計兩個方面闡述了自己的觀點。在罪名設計方面,又分析了“毒駕”犯罪的犯罪構成問題。本文的第四章又具體論述了“毒駕”入刑以后的司法認定問題。主要包括“罪與非罪”問題,以及本罪與彼罪之間的界限問題。最后為本文得出的結論。經過研究,本文認為:在“毒駕”形勢愈發(fā)猖獗的今天,“毒駕”行為入刑已是刻不容緩。在借鑒域外國家關于“毒駕”犯罪的立法經驗之后,本文建議將“毒駕”行為納入危險駕駛罪,作為危險駕駛罪的罪狀之一,犯本罪的,處拘役,并處罰金。有前款行為,同時構成其他犯罪的,依照處罰較重的規(guī)定定罪處罰。同時,本文認為治理“毒駕”等毒品類犯罪,既不能不要刑法,也不能僅僅依靠刑法打擊。“徒法不能自行”,唯有發(fā)動群眾,走群眾路線,才能徹底消滅毒品犯罪這一社會毒瘤。
[Abstract]:Since the promulgation of Amendment VIII to the Criminal Code, the study of "drug driving" has been active. Amendment IX to the Criminal Law, which came into effect on 1 November 2015, although it extends the crime of dangerous driving, However, the strong response of the people and scholars to "drug driving" has still not been achieved. This once again caused a discussion upsurge in the academic world, and the debate about whether drug driving should be sentenced to punishment began to rise and fall one after another in the academic circle. The first chapter of this paper aims to define the clear meaning of "poison driving". Drug driving is divided into three parts: drug-taking behavior, driving behavior and the influence of drug-taking behavior on driving behavior. And respectively to these three parts carries on the theoretical discussion and the definition, this article finally gives "the poison driving" the behavior definition is: the so-called "poison driving" refers to the perpetrator after ingesting the narcotic drugs and the psychotropic drugs which the state prescribes, Under the pharmacological action of drugs, the behavior of starting the engine of the motor vehicle or the actual operation of the motor vehicle based on the intention of running the motor vehicle. In the second chapter, the author first introduces two theories about whether "poison driving" should be punished, that is, "negative theory" and "positive theory". The main reasons for "negative driving" against the entry of "poison driving" are as follows: "poison driving" violates the principle of modesty of criminal law, and "poison driving" violates the principle of legality of crime and punishment of criminal law, and "poison driving" violates the principle of crime and punishment of criminal law. Drug driving is difficult to ensure the fair identification and execution of justice. On the contrary, "positive theory" puts forward a contrary view on "negative theory". At the end of this paper, the author agrees with the view that "drug driving" should be punished. Then, on the basis of supporting "positive theory", this paper emphasizes the necessity and feasibility of "poison driving" in our country again. The third chapter of this paper, on the basis of the previous discussion, and drawing lessons from the legislative experience of foreign countries, puts forward the legislative conception of "drug driving". In this paper, the author expounds his viewpoint from two aspects: the entry standard and the charge design of "drug driving" in our country. In the crime design aspect, also analyzed "poison driving" crime constitution question. The fourth chapter of this paper specifically discusses the issue of judicial determination after the death of "poison driving". It mainly includes the question of crime and non-crime, as well as the boundary between this crime and other sin. Finally, this paper draws a conclusion. Through the research, this paper holds that: in the situation of "drug driving" is more rampant today, "drug driving" behavior has become an urgent task. After drawing lessons from the legislative experience of foreign countries on the crime of drug driving, this paper suggests that the act of drug driving be included in the crime of dangerous driving as one of the counts of the crime of dangerous driving, if the criminal is guilty of the crime, he shall be sentenced to criminal detention and concurrently be sentenced to a fine. If any act in the preceding paragraph constitutes any other crime, the offender shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of the heavier punishment. At the same time, this paper argues that to deal with drug-related crimes, such as drug driving, can not only be dealt with without criminal law, nor can it be dealt with only by criminal law. Only by mobilizing the masses and following the mass line can we thoroughly eliminate the social cancer of drug-related crimes.
【學位授予單位】：南昌大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2018
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 邱興隆;配刑原則統一論[J];中國社會科學;1999年06期

相關碩士學位論文 前7條

1 李騁;關于毒駕行為入罪的法律問題研究[D];中央民族大學;2015年

2 羅鵬菲;“毒駕”的刑法規(guī)制問題研究[D];西南政法大學;2015年

3 才宇;“毒駕”問題的刑法學研究[D];黑龍江大學;2014年

4 鄭艷;毒駕行為入罪的刑法思考[D];華東政法大學;2014年

5 秦川;“毒駕”刑事責任研究[D];中國海洋大學;2014年

6 蘇微;毒駕入刑問題探析[D];沈陽師范大學;2013年

7 譚姝;論危險駕駛行為的刑法治理路徑之評析[D];湖南師范大學;2011年

，

本文編號：2460310