我國刑罰裁量過程中立功認定問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-04-11 19:00
【摘要】：在我國,按照刑事程序進程的推進,將立功分為刑罰裁量過程中的立功與刑罰執(zhí)行過程中的立功,或者作為量刑情節(jié)的立功和作為行刑情節(jié)的立功;也有人以立功對象的不同,將其稱之為犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的立功與罪犯的立功。本文將論述對象限定在刑罰裁量過程中的立功,也即犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的立功。立功源于“立功受獎”的思想,因其給社會帶來的實際效用而被青睞。本文以量刑情節(jié)的立功這一“微型”視角為研究對象,集中深入地討論了立功的內涵、歷史變遷和價值根基,試圖對立功認定中出現得比較頻繁的部分疑難問題進行梳理,并尋找問題的解決路徑。本文除了引言外,共分為五個部分,約3萬字:第一部分是立功的概述。此部分首先界定了立功的概念,分析立功定義中所包含的要素;接著以時間為線索,梳理了我國立功的歷史淵源,并理清了我國立功作為法定量刑情節(jié)的價值取向。第二部分是對立功的價值根基展開的論述。先后闡述了立功的正義價值以及功利價值的內涵及其體現,并引出立功適用中兩大價值沖突及其平衡;最終確立立功中“正義優(yōu)先、兼顧功利”的價值定位,為解決司法認定中的難題提供理論依據。第三部分主要梳理立功認定中出現的部分問題。以案例為藍本,提取了各個類型立功中的部分爭議點。指出立功適用中標準模糊、揭發(fā)對象對立功認定的影響、線索來源不明以及立功行為異化等現實中比較常見的問題。第四部分為解決立功認定問題的具體途徑。這是本文的重點。這一部分對第三部分所提出的問題進行了一一解答,提出要對立功認定標準進行細化;對立功的主體、“其他”條款進行了解釋;回答了涉及揭發(fā)對象不同從而影響立功認定的問題;還指出了立功線索要具有明確性與正當性,并對立功異化現象中的幾個特殊問題的認定提出了自己的看法。第五部分為結語。這一部分補充說明了立功在立法方面存在的問題,提出了立法上對立功進行完善的建議,并對本文的寫作目的、內容及意義進行了重申。
[Abstract]:In our country, according to the progress of the criminal procedure, the meritorious service is divided into the meritorious service in the course of the penalty discretion and the merit in the process of the execution of the penalty, or as the merit of the circumstances of the sentencing and the circumstances of the execution of the sentence; Some people call it the criminal suspect, the defendant's meritorious service and the criminal's meritorious service according to the different objects of meritorious service. This article limits the object to the meritorious service in the process of penalty discretion, that is, the criminal suspect, the defendant's meritorious service. Meritorious service originates from the idea of meritorious service and is favored for its practical utility to the society. This paper focuses on the connotation, historical changes and value foundation of meritorious service, and tries to sort out some difficult problems that appear frequently in the determination of meritorious service, based on the "mini" angle of view of "merit in sentencing circumstances", focusing on the connotation, historical changes and value foundation of meritorious service. And find a solution to the problem. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into five parts, about 30,000 words: the first part is a summary of meritorious service. This part first defines the concept of meritorious service, analyzes the elements contained in the definition of meritorious service, and then combs the historical origin of our country's meritorious service with the clue of time, and clarifies the value orientation of our country's meritorious service as the circumstances of statutory sentencing. The second part is the discussion of the value foundation of meritorious service. It expounds the connotation and embodiment of the justice value and utility value of meritorious service, and leads to the conflict and balance between the two values in the application of meritorious service. Finally, the value orientation of "justice first, giving consideration to utility" in meritorious service is established, which provides the theoretical basis for solving the difficult problems in judicial determination. The third part mainly combs some problems that appear in the recognition of meritorious service. Based on the case, this paper extracts some controversial points of each type of meritorious service. It is pointed out that there are some common problems in the application of meritorious service, such as the vague standard, the influence of exposed objects on the recognition of meritorious service, the unknown source of clues and the alienation of meritorious behavior and so on. The fourth part is the concrete way to solve the problem of merit determination. This is the focus of this article. This part answers one by one the questions raised in the third part, proposes to refine the standards of merit recognition, explains the main body of meritorious service, "other" clauses, and makes a detailed explanation of the "other" clauses of the main body of meritorious service. It also points out that the clue of meritorious service should have clarity and legitimacy, and puts forward some opinions on the identification of some special problems in the phenomenon of dissimilation of meritorious service. The fifth part is the conclusion. In this part, the author explains the problems existing in the legislation of meritorious service, puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect it in legislation, and reiterates the purpose, content and significance of this article.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924
本文編號：2456667
[Abstract]:In our country, according to the progress of the criminal procedure, the meritorious service is divided into the meritorious service in the course of the penalty discretion and the merit in the process of the execution of the penalty, or as the merit of the circumstances of the sentencing and the circumstances of the execution of the sentence; Some people call it the criminal suspect, the defendant's meritorious service and the criminal's meritorious service according to the different objects of meritorious service. This article limits the object to the meritorious service in the process of penalty discretion, that is, the criminal suspect, the defendant's meritorious service. Meritorious service originates from the idea of meritorious service and is favored for its practical utility to the society. This paper focuses on the connotation, historical changes and value foundation of meritorious service, and tries to sort out some difficult problems that appear frequently in the determination of meritorious service, based on the "mini" angle of view of "merit in sentencing circumstances", focusing on the connotation, historical changes and value foundation of meritorious service. And find a solution to the problem. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into five parts, about 30,000 words: the first part is a summary of meritorious service. This part first defines the concept of meritorious service, analyzes the elements contained in the definition of meritorious service, and then combs the historical origin of our country's meritorious service with the clue of time, and clarifies the value orientation of our country's meritorious service as the circumstances of statutory sentencing. The second part is the discussion of the value foundation of meritorious service. It expounds the connotation and embodiment of the justice value and utility value of meritorious service, and leads to the conflict and balance between the two values in the application of meritorious service. Finally, the value orientation of "justice first, giving consideration to utility" in meritorious service is established, which provides the theoretical basis for solving the difficult problems in judicial determination. The third part mainly combs some problems that appear in the recognition of meritorious service. Based on the case, this paper extracts some controversial points of each type of meritorious service. It is pointed out that there are some common problems in the application of meritorious service, such as the vague standard, the influence of exposed objects on the recognition of meritorious service, the unknown source of clues and the alienation of meritorious behavior and so on. The fourth part is the concrete way to solve the problem of merit determination. This is the focus of this article. This part answers one by one the questions raised in the third part, proposes to refine the standards of merit recognition, explains the main body of meritorious service, "other" clauses, and makes a detailed explanation of the "other" clauses of the main body of meritorious service. It also points out that the clue of meritorious service should have clarity and legitimacy, and puts forward some opinions on the identification of some special problems in the phenomenon of dissimilation of meritorious service. The fifth part is the conclusion. In this part, the author explains the problems existing in the legislation of meritorious service, puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect it in legislation, and reiterates the purpose, content and significance of this article.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 熊瑛;張鳳彬;;關于我國刑法立功概念的綜述及評析[J];四川理工學院學報(社會科學版);2012年05期
2 殷艷梅;;刑事偵查階段立功制度實行現狀探究[J];重慶科技學院學報(社會科學版);2012年08期
3 徐科雷;;刑法立功制度若干問題芻議[J];中國刑事法雜志;2012年03期
4 熊瑛;;試論立功制度的五重根基[J];河北法學;2012年02期
5 陳歡;;我國立功制度再探討[J];湖南警察學院學報;2011年06期
6 張影;謝文春;;立功制度若干問題研究[J];行政與法;2011年12期
7 陳瑞林;嚴西文;;反思我國刑法中的立功制度[J];韓山師范學院學報;2011年02期
8 徐艷;;立功認定若干問題探析[J];市場周刊(理論研究);2011年03期
9 蔡永彤;;功利與公正之間：立功制度的價值取向及其改造[J];政治與法律;2008年08期
10 甘杰麗;;從買功現象看立功制度的本質[J];廣西民族大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年S2期
，本文編號：2456667
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2456667.html
