【摘要】：長期以來,公安機關是我國重要的治安行政、刑事司法力量。其本身具有的人民民主專政工具職能,以及打擊犯罪、保護人民等職責,使警察職業(yè)本身成為和平時期最繁忙和危險的職業(yè)。當前,我國的經濟社會高速發(fā)展,不可避免帶來了社會矛盾的集聚和凸顯,公安機關維護社會和諧穩(wěn)定的任務十分繁重。人民警察在執(zhí)行職務過程中被侮辱謾罵、圍攻阻擾是常事。暴力襲擊造成傷亡的人數也在逐年攀升,人民警察的執(zhí)法權威面臨前所未有的挑戰(zhàn)。從2015年11月1日起,隨著刑法修正案(九)的正式實施,暴力襲警被正式納入刑法制裁的范疇,暴力襲警者將被按照妨害公務罪從重處罰。此項立法舉措符合暴力襲警案件時有發(fā)生的實際情況,將更好地體現人民警察特殊的執(zhí)法身份和地位,保障人民警察依法執(zhí)行職務,更好地保護人民群眾生命財產安全。在本文中,筆者作為一名人民警察,將立足自身工作實際,從分析襲警行為的概念、現狀及特點等出發(fā),通過對比國內外規(guī)制襲警行為的立法實踐,分別從犯罪對象、行為、主體、罪過等方面,著力對該罪的認定提出能夠完善的空間。本文共分為四個部分進行論述。第一部分論述襲警行為及其刑法規(guī)制的必要性。通過對比分析人民警察傷亡數字,論證了襲警行為是警察受傷的首要原因、襲警行為正呈現高發(fā)態(tài)勢。繼而從嚴重侵害法益和應受刑罰處罰兩個方面,提出了刑法學意義上的"襲警"概念。通過論述警察法律地位的重要性、職業(yè)特點的特殊性及襲警行為的嚴重法益侵害性,闡明了刑法規(guī)制襲警行為的緊迫性和必要性。第二部分論述國內外襲警行為刑法規(guī)制的立法模式。通過分析域外襲警行為刑法規(guī)制的立法模式,學習國外對襲警行為刑法規(guī)制有益經驗,提出了我國襲警行為刑法規(guī)制的未來選擇。第三部分論述襲警行為刑法規(guī)制的客觀層面。在分析借鑒現有刑法理論界有關觀點的基礎上,對行為方式、依法執(zhí)行職務、行為對象等客觀要素進行刑法上的認定。第四部分論述襲警行為刑法規(guī)制的主觀層面。從分析襲警故意的認識內容入手,繼而闡明在判斷"明知"時需要注意的問題,并論述了犯罪動機對量刑的影響。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the public security organ is our country important public security administration, the criminal judicature strength. Its own role as an instrument of people's democratic dictatorship, as well as the duties of combating crime and protecting the people, makes the police profession itself the busiest and most dangerous profession in peacetime. At present, the rapid development of China's economy and society inevitably brings about the gathering and highlighting of social contradictions, and the task of public security organs to maintain social harmony and stability is very onerous. It is common for the people's police to be insulted and abused in the course of carrying out their duties. The number of casualties caused by violent attacks is also rising year by year, and the law enforcement authority of the people's police is facing unprecedented challenges. Starting from November 1, 2015, with the formal implementation of Criminal Law Amendment (9), violent assaulting police officers are formally included in the scope of criminal law sanctions, violent assaulting police officers will be given a heavier punishment according to the crime of obstruction of public service. This legislative measure is in line with the fact that violent assaults on the police occur from time to time, and will better reflect the special status and status of the people's police, guarantee the people's police to carry out their duties according to law, and better protect the lives and property of the people. In this paper, the author as a people's police, based on their own work, from the analysis of the concept, current situation and characteristics of assaulting police, through the comparison of domestic and foreign legislative practice to regulate assaulting police, respectively from the object of crime, behavior, and so on. Subject, crime and other aspects, focus on the identification of the crime can be perfect space. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss. The first part discusses the behavior of assaulting police and the necessity of criminal regulation. By comparing and analyzing the casualties of the people's police, it is proved that assaulting the police is the primary cause of the police injury, and the assaulting of the police is showing a high incidence. Then it puts forward the concept of "attacking police" in the sense of criminal law from two aspects: serious infringement of legal interests and punishment. By discussing the importance of the legal status of the police, the particularity of the professional characteristics and the serious legal benefit aggression of the assaulting police, this paper expounds the urgency and necessity of the criminal law to regulate the assaulting of the police. The second part discusses the legislative model of criminal regulation of assaulting police at home and abroad. By analyzing the legislative model of criminal regulation of assaulting police in foreign countries, this paper studies the beneficial experience of criminal regulation of assaulting police in foreign countries, and puts forward the future choice of criminal regulation of assaulting police in China. The third part discusses the objective aspect of criminal regulation of assaulting police. On the basis of analyzing and drawing lessons from the existing theories of criminal law, the objective elements such as the mode of conduct, the execution of duties according to law, the object of conduct and other objective elements are identified in criminal law. The fourth part discusses the subjective aspect of criminal regulation of assaulting police. Starting from the analysis of the cognition content of attacking police officers, this paper expounds the problems that should be paid attention to when judging the "knowing", and discusses the influence of criminal motivation on sentencing.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 金建軍,馬驍;持槍襲警案件帶來的思考[J];吉林公安高等�？茖W校學報;2000年03期

2 陳玉嶺;插翅難逃——永城“8·2”特大搶劫、襲警案偵破始末[J];公安月刊;2001年11期

3 王龍?zhí)?;襲警的類型、特點及危害[J];河南公安高等專科學校學報;2009年02期

4 張全忠;梅振中;;1.04泰安襲警案對反貪協(xié)查工作的警示[J];中國檢察官;2011年06期

5 高列兵;佘軍奇;;泰安“1·4”襲警案對民警使用武器問題的思考[J];警察實戰(zhàn)訓練研究;2011年03期

6 熊鷹;襲警案的教訓與啟示[J];河南公安學刊;1997年04期

7 熊鷹;“97·1·7”襲警案中的教訓與啟示[J];公安論壇;1997年03期

8 若禹;;如何消解上海襲警案的“民意偏見”[J];民主與法制;2008年16期

9 童大煥;;不要把楊佳襲警案僅當成個案[J];雜文選刊(上旬版);2008年09期

10 ;震驚全國的楊佳襲警案始末[J];章回小說(下半月);2010年09期

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 記者 郭宏鵬 黃輝 通訊員 陳立偉;南昌襲警嫌疑人全部歸案[N];法制日報;2013年

2 本報記者　羅旭;襲警頻發(fā)引出的話題[N];光明日報;2005年

3 通訊員　譚志勇;襲警案遇害民警被追授全國公安一級英模[N];北京日報;2006年

4 周立權;警察頻頻遭襲,是否該設“襲警罪”？[N];新華每日電訊;2006年

5 左崇年;“最牛”襲警案背后的沉痛[N];中華工商時報;2008年

6 記者 李剛;上海襲警案偵查完畢[N];中華工商時報;2008年

7 記者 呂東;銀川依法嚴肅處理“8·02”暴力襲警案[N];人民公安報;2011年

8 本報記者 鄭赫南;劉代表第十次建議增設“襲警罪”[N];檢察日報;2012年

9 本報記者 徐偉;權威專家“重繪”2008襲警案心理圖像[N];法制日報;2009年

10 本報記者 黃明健　唐曉勇;設襲警罪是更好地維護法律權威[N];人民公安報;2009年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 陳驊;襲警行為入刑之評判[D];南京大學;2016年

2 高玉虎;論增設襲警罪[D];山東大學;2016年

3 錢曉華;襲警行為的成因及法律規(guī)制[D];上海交通大學;2015年

4 王文雄;關于襲警行為入刑的思考[D];蘇州大學;2016年

5 宋冬平;試論襲警罪的單獨設立[D];江西財經大學;2016年

6 史佳敏;我國襲警行為刑事立法研究[D];山西大學;2016年

7 牟從陽;我國襲警行為法律規(guī)制[D];江西財經大學;2016年

8 馬鴻利;論我國襲警行為的刑法規(guī)制[D];山東大學;2017年

9 李志強;我國設立襲警罪的立法研究[D];山東大學;2010年

10 劉國斌;我國襲警案件的防控對策研究[D];山東大學;2010年

，

本文編號：2441045