報(bào)應(yīng)主義視野下累犯制度的正當(dāng)性——論證困境與現(xiàn)實(shí)啟示
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-13 11:07
【摘要】：與功利主義一樣,報(bào)應(yīng)主義一直被學(xué)者用來證明累犯制度的理論正當(dāng)性。在報(bào)應(yīng)主義視野下,學(xué)界主流的做法一般是通過嘗試證明累犯相較于初犯罪責(zé)程度更高或是罪行危害更大來正當(dāng)化累犯制度。由于此類傳統(tǒng)論證進(jìn)路努力在現(xiàn)有刑法理論框架之內(nèi)為累犯制度提供一個(gè)令人信服的正當(dāng)化理論根據(jù),我們稱其為"內(nèi)部論證進(jìn)路"。與此相對(duì),另有學(xué)者決定拋開現(xiàn)有刑法理論框架,轉(zhuǎn)而借助諸如道德理論之類的外來理論來對(duì)累犯制度正當(dāng)性做非傳統(tǒng)的論證,我們稱其為"外部論證進(jìn)路"。然而,無論是采取內(nèi)部進(jìn)路還是外部進(jìn)路,學(xué)者從報(bào)應(yīng)主義層面對(duì)累犯制度理論正當(dāng)性進(jìn)行的論證均存在著無法克服的邏輯缺陷。累犯制度的合理性主要在于現(xiàn)實(shí)必要性而非理論正當(dāng)性。累犯制度理論正當(dāng)性方面的先天不足應(yīng)該時(shí)刻提醒立法者和司法者審慎對(duì)待累犯制度。
[Abstract]:Like utilitarianism, retribution has been used by scholars to justify the theory of recidivism. From the perspective of retribution, the mainstream practice in academic circles is to justify recidivism by trying to prove that recidivism is more responsible or harmful than the first offence. As this kind of traditional argumentation approach tries to provide a convincing theoretical basis for the recidivism system within the framework of the existing criminal law theory, we call it the "internal argumentation approach". In contrast, other scholars decided to cast aside the existing criminal law theoretical framework and use the external theories such as moral theory to do non-traditional argument on the legitimacy of recidivism system, which we call the "external argumentation approach". However, no matter whether the internal or external approaches, scholars from the perspective of retribution to prove the legitimacy of recidivism system theory has an insurmountable logic defect. The rationality of recidivism system mainly lies in the realistic necessity rather than the theoretical legitimacy. The inherent deficiency in the legitimacy of recidivism system should remind legislators and judiciaries to treat recidivism carefully.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)刑事法律科學(xué)研究院;
【基金】：北京市社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“前科刑事法效應(yīng)實(shí)證研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):16FXC031)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1
本文編號(hào)：2439336
[Abstract]:Like utilitarianism, retribution has been used by scholars to justify the theory of recidivism. From the perspective of retribution, the mainstream practice in academic circles is to justify recidivism by trying to prove that recidivism is more responsible or harmful than the first offence. As this kind of traditional argumentation approach tries to provide a convincing theoretical basis for the recidivism system within the framework of the existing criminal law theory, we call it the "internal argumentation approach". In contrast, other scholars decided to cast aside the existing criminal law theoretical framework and use the external theories such as moral theory to do non-traditional argument on the legitimacy of recidivism system, which we call the "external argumentation approach". However, no matter whether the internal or external approaches, scholars from the perspective of retribution to prove the legitimacy of recidivism system theory has an insurmountable logic defect. The rationality of recidivism system mainly lies in the realistic necessity rather than the theoretical legitimacy. The inherent deficiency in the legitimacy of recidivism system should remind legislators and judiciaries to treat recidivism carefully.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)刑事法律科學(xué)研究院;
【基金】：北京市社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“前科刑事法效應(yīng)實(shí)證研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):16FXC031)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 楊靜;;論刑事累犯制度及其完善[J];新鄉(xiāng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期
2 ;[J];;年期
，本文編號(hào)：2439336
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2439336.html
教材專著
