【摘要】：在民生刑法觀指導(dǎo)下,為加強(qiáng)對(duì)民眾生命健康安全保護(hù),《刑法修正案(八)》將我國(guó)1997年《刑法》第141條規(guī)定的生產(chǎn)、銷售假藥罪由危險(xiǎn)犯改為行為犯,對(duì)制售假藥行為加大了打擊力度。生產(chǎn)銷售假藥罪旨在保護(hù)多重法益,法益保護(hù)有主次之分,主次法益發(fā)生價(jià)值沖突時(shí),應(yīng)以保護(hù)主要法益為原則。刑法規(guī)范層面上,公民生命健康法益的保護(hù)處于優(yōu)勢(shì)地位,秩序的維護(hù)則處于從屬地位,其目的在于更好地保障個(gè)人法益。對(duì)于假藥的認(rèn)定應(yīng)根據(jù)藥品是否具有真實(shí)療效進(jìn)行實(shí)質(zhì)認(rèn)定而不能僅從形式上看是否取得藥品管理部門批號(hào)。在陸勇案中,陸勇代購藥品行為不具有法益侵害性,欠缺相關(guān)犯罪構(gòu)成要件的違法性要素,不應(yīng)作為犯罪處理。
[Abstract]:Under the guidance of the people's livelihood criminal law, in order to strengthen the protection of the people's health and safety, the "Criminal Law Amendment (8)" changed the production stipulated in Article 141 of the 1997 Criminal Law, and the crime of selling counterfeit drugs was changed from a dangerous crime to an act crime. The production and sale of counterfeit drugs increased the crackdown. The crime of producing and selling counterfeit drugs is aimed at protecting multiple legal interests, which are divided into primary and secondary ones. When the primary and secondary legal interests conflict of value, the principle of protecting the main legal interests should be taken as the principle. In the aspect of criminal law, the protection of citizens' life and health interests is in an advantageous position, while the maintenance of order is in a subordinate position, the purpose of which is to better protect individual legal interests. The identification of counterfeit medicine should be based on whether the drug has true curative effect or not, but not only from the form of whether to obtain the drug administration department batch number. In the case of Lu Yong, the behavior of purchasing drugs on behalf of Lu Yong does not have the infringement of legal interests and lacks the illegal elements of the constitutive elements of the relevant crimes, so it should not be treated as a crime.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：江蘇省法學(xué)會(huì)課題“經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪中的被害人研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):SFH2014C14)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 盧建平;;加強(qiáng)對(duì)民生的刑法保護(hù)——民生刑法之提倡[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年12期

2 何榮功;;經(jīng)濟(jì)自由與經(jīng)濟(jì)刑法正當(dāng)性的體系思考[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2014年06期

3 張勇;;民生刑法的品格:兼評(píng)《刑法修正案(八)》[J];河北法學(xué);2011年06期

4 何榮功;;要慎重對(duì)待“民生刑法觀”[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2014年03期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉大元;挪用公款罪共犯研究[J];安徽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

2 董玉庭;黃大威;;論聚眾淫亂罪的刑事立法——以無被害人犯罪為研究視角[J];北方論叢;2012年03期

3 蔣t，

本文編號(hào)：2408519