【摘要】：社會(huì)是處于不斷發(fā)展變化中的,尤其伴隨著全球化的進(jìn)程,社會(huì)更加呈現(xiàn)出多元化的發(fā)展趨勢。當(dāng)然,犯罪也是緊跟時(shí)代的趨勢的,呈現(xiàn)出多元化、分工化、高科技化等多種趨勢。生活在高度現(xiàn)代化的世界里,各類風(fēng)險(xiǎn)伴隨增加,各類過失犯罪的危害性也伴隨增加。刑法也必須緊跟這一時(shí)代腳步,這樣才能縮小其先天所擁有的滯后性問題,以確保和促進(jìn)社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定和發(fā)展。傳統(tǒng)刑法理論以實(shí)害結(jié)果作為過失犯罪成立的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)已不能滿足現(xiàn)代社會(huì)對(duì)預(yù)防犯罪的需求,為了防衛(wèi)社會(huì),刑法有必要將介入的時(shí)間提前到發(fā)生一定的危險(xiǎn)狀態(tài)的階段。過失危險(xiǎn)犯有其獨(dú)特的客體、客觀方面、主體、主觀方面的特征,本文將對(duì)此進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的介紹。過失危險(xiǎn)犯有其存在的理論性依據(jù),對(duì)此本文將從風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)理論、社會(huì)危害性理論、社會(huì)防衛(wèi)論、刑法謙抑性原則這四大方面來探討過失危險(xiǎn)犯存在的依據(jù)。我國過失危險(xiǎn)犯的立法存在缺陷,并不能滿足社會(huì)的需求,比較研究而言,國外關(guān)于過失危險(xiǎn)犯的立法已相當(dāng)成熟。因此,有必要在了解國外過失危險(xiǎn)犯的實(shí)踐基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的借鑒,以加強(qiáng)對(duì)我國過失危險(xiǎn)犯的立法完善。
[Abstract]:Society is constantly developing and changing, especially with the process of globalization. Of course, crime also closely follows the trend of the times, showing diversified, division of labor, high-tech and other trends. Living in a highly modern world, all kinds of risks increase, and so does the harm of negligent crime. Criminal law must also keep pace with this era so as to reduce its inherent lag problem in order to ensure and promote social stability and development. In order to defend the society, it is necessary for the criminal law to advance the time of intervention to the stage of a certain dangerous state in order to protect the society, because the traditional criminal law theory regards the actual harm result as the standard of the establishment of the negligent crime can no longer meet the demand of the modern society to prevent the crime. The characteristics of negligent danger in its unique object, objective aspect, subject and subjective aspect are introduced in this paper. The theoretical basis for the existence of negligent danger is discussed in this paper from the four aspects of risk society theory, social harmfulness theory, social defense theory and the principle of modesty of criminal law. There are defects in the legislation of negligent dangerous crime in our country, which can not meet the needs of the society. Compared with the research, the foreign legislation on negligent dangerous crime has been quite mature. Therefore, it is necessary to use for reference on the basis of understanding the practice of negligent dangerous crime in foreign countries, so as to strengthen the legislative perfection of negligent dangerous crime in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉仁文;刑法中的嚴(yán)格責(zé)任研究[J];比較法研究;2001年01期

2 徐衛(wèi)東;西原春夫;關(guān)哲夫;李潔;賈宇;梅傳強(qiáng);李永升;徐岱;馮衛(wèi)國;童德華;陳忠林;張旭;李韌夫;華偉;閔春雷;李邦友;高珊琦;陳玉范;夏勇;王充;;刑法謙抑在中國——四校刑法學(xué)高層論壇[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年01期

3 趙永紅;人身危險(xiǎn)性概念新論[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

4 游偉,謝錫美;信賴原則及其在過失犯罪中的運(yùn)用[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年05期

5 俞利平,王良華;論過失危險(xiǎn)犯[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年03期

6 張瑞幸,郭潔;過失危險(xiǎn)犯與環(huán)境犯罪[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

7 臧冬斌;;過失危險(xiǎn)犯之危險(xiǎn)研究[J];法商研究;2006年03期

8 張明楷;論刑法的謙抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1995年04期

9 趙秉志;劉志偉;;犯罪過失理論若干爭議問題研究[J];法學(xué)家;2000年05期

10 克勞斯·羅克辛;王世洲;;德國犯罪原理的發(fā)展與現(xiàn)代趨勢[J];法學(xué)家;2007年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2397258