【摘要】：數(shù)額犯未遂問題的核心是數(shù)額未遂犯的可罰性根據(jù)問題，它一方面取決于數(shù)額在該犯罪構(gòu)成中的地位與作用，另一方面又取決于未遂犯的可罰性。據(jù)此，本文首先對刑法上“數(shù)額”的相關(guān)法條進(jìn)行梳理，指出所謂的數(shù)額是指刑法規(guī)定的能以貨幣度量的經(jīng)濟(jì)價值或者財產(chǎn)利益的數(shù)值，它是犯罪構(gòu)成中的整體性規(guī)范要素；而所謂的數(shù)額犯是指以法定數(shù)額作為犯罪成立條件的犯罪類型。其次，通過未遂犯的根據(jù)的研究，并結(jié)合“數(shù)額”的限定功能構(gòu)建數(shù)額未遂犯的可罰性根據(jù)理論：作為數(shù)額未遂犯的可罰性基礎(chǔ)是行為造成財產(chǎn)法益受侵犯的危險性，同時，它要求以“數(shù)額”為表現(xiàn)形式的行為危險性與行為人危險性來填充數(shù)額犯未遂行為的可罰性，使其充足成立犯罪的實質(zhì)根據(jù)。最后，本文還對司法實踐的問題加以檢討，得出以下結(jié)論：一是生產(chǎn)、銷售偽劣產(chǎn)品未遂，情節(jié)嚴(yán)重的可以定罪處罰，，這其中的可罰性根據(jù)是以生產(chǎn)、銷售行為造成偽劣產(chǎn)品流入市場的結(jié)果危險為基礎(chǔ)，并以擴(kuò)大的行為危險范圍來填充因缺乏既遂危害結(jié)果的可罰性“漏洞”。二是盜竊未遂司法解釋中“以數(shù)額巨大的財物為目標(biāo)”是犯罪行為對象的數(shù)額，不是犯罪人主觀意圖的數(shù)額；同時，對于盜竊未遂犯的刑罰裁量應(yīng)適用“數(shù)額較大”中的刑檔。
[Abstract]:The core of the problem of attempted crime of amount is the question of the penalty basis of attempted crime of amount. On the one hand, it depends on the position and function of amount in the constitution of the crime, on the other hand, it depends on the penalization of attempted crime. Based on this, this paper firstly combs the relevant articles of the "amount" in the criminal law, and points out that the so-called amount refers to the value of the economic value or the property benefit which can be measured by money, which is the integral normative element in the constitution of the crime. The so-called amount of crime refers to the legal amount of crime as the conditions for the establishment of the type of crime. Secondly, through the research of the basis of attempted crime and combining with the limited function of "amount", the author constructs the theory of the penalty basis of the amount of attempted crime: as the foundation of the penalty of the amount of attempted crime, it is the danger of property law beneficial infringement caused by the act, at the same time, It requires "amount" as a form of behavior risk and the risk of the perpetrator to fill in the amount of attempted acts of punishment, so as to make it sufficient to establish the substantive basis of the crime. Finally, this paper also reviews the judicial practice, and draws the following conclusions: first, the attempted production and sale of fake and inferior products, if the circumstances are serious, can be convicted and punished, and the penalty is based on production. The sale behavior causes the perils of the counterfeit and inferior products to enter the market, and fills in the penalty "loophole" because of the lack of the accomplished harm result by expanding the range of the behavior risk. Second, in the judicial interpretation of attempted theft, "the object of the crime is the object of the crime with a large amount of property", not the amount of the criminal's subjective intention; at the same time, the penalty discretion of the attempted burglary should be applied to the criminal file of the "large amount".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.11

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉之雄;數(shù)額犯若干問題新探[J];法商研究;2005年06期

2 陳洪兵;從我國犯罪概念的定量性探析犯罪未遂問題——兼談知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪未遂形態(tài)[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年03期

3 涂龍科;;犯罪論中數(shù)額的地位[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2012年04期

4 張永江;;論未遂犯的處罰根據(jù)[J];河北法學(xué);2006年10期

5 童偉華;數(shù)額犯若干問題研究[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2001年04期

6 儲槐植,汪永樂;再論我國刑法中犯罪概念的定量因素[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年02期

7 王世洲;現(xiàn)代刑罰目的理論與中國的選擇[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年03期

8 游偉,陸建紅;人身危險性在我國刑法中的功能定位[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年04期

9 陳璇;;客觀的未遂犯處罰根據(jù)論之提倡[J];法學(xué)研究;2011年02期

10 王瑩;;情節(jié)犯之情節(jié)的犯罪論體系性定位[J];法學(xué)研究;2012年03期

本文編號：2394938