【摘要】：近年來(lái),隨著移動(dòng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的普及化人們實(shí)現(xiàn)了隨時(shí)隨地上網(wǎng),移動(dòng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的迅速發(fā)展帶給人們便利的同時(shí)也為網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中誹謗的滋生和傳播提供了更寬闊的平臺(tái),增加了發(fā)生網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗案件的機(jī)率。針對(duì)逐年上升的網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗,我國(guó)在2013年9月9日出臺(tái)了《最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院關(guān)于辦理利用信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)施誹謗等刑事案件適用法律若干問(wèn)題的解釋》。該《司法解釋》的出臺(tái)解決了在辦理網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗案件時(shí)的一部分實(shí)際操作當(dāng)中的認(rèn)定問(wèn)題,與以往寬泛和模糊的定罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)相比具有更強(qiáng)和突出的操作性。但是由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)本身具有的復(fù)雜環(huán)境和特點(diǎn),司法解釋能不能經(jīng)得住司法實(shí)踐中的考驗(yàn)還是一個(gè)未知數(shù)。雖然新出臺(tái)的解釋為網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗的司法適用提供了一定的法律依據(jù),但是由于我國(guó)目前還沒(méi)有出臺(tái)任何關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的專門性法律。因此,司法解釋的出臺(tái)并不等于說(shuō)該司法解釋是完善的。本文通過(guò)找出在實(shí)踐中認(rèn)定和處罰網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗時(shí)與司法解釋相矛盾的問(wèn)題,試圖完善和彌補(bǔ)具體運(yùn)用司法解釋解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗案件時(shí)出現(xiàn)的缺陷。 本文共分為五個(gè)部分,第一部分是研究背景,研究目的與意義,研究方法。第二部分主要是闡述我國(guó)關(guān)于誹謗罪和網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗的規(guī)定,第三部分主要分析了新司法解釋出臺(tái)后,在適用時(shí)出現(xiàn)的與之相矛盾的問(wèn)題,第四部分通過(guò)提出問(wèn)題和借鑒韓日的做法的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了完善司法解釋的幾點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the popularization of mobile network, people have realized the Internet anytime, anywhere, the rapid development of mobile network brings people convenience, but also provides a wider platform for the breeding and dissemination of libel in the network environment. Increased the chance of internet libel cases. In view of the increasing number of Internet libel, on September 9, 2013, our country issued the explanation of the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate on the application of law in criminal cases such as using information network to carry out libel. The introduction of the judicial interpretation resolves the problem of cognizance in part of the actual operation in dealing with the online libel cases, and it has stronger and more outstanding maneuverability compared with the broad and vague conviction standard in the past. However, due to the complex environment and characteristics of the network itself, whether the judicial interpretation can stand the test of judicial practice is still unknown. Although the new interpretation provides a legal basis for the judicial application of network libel, there is no special law on network crime in our country at present. Therefore, the introduction of judicial interpretation does not mean that the judicial interpretation is perfect. This paper tries to perfect and make up for the defects in using judicial interpretation to solve network libel cases by identifying and punishing the contradiction between online libel and judicial interpretation in practice. This paper is divided into five parts, the first part is the research background, research purpose and significance, research methods. The second part is mainly about the stipulation of libel and network libel in our country. The third part mainly analyzes the contradictory problems that appear when the new judicial interpretation comes out. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions to perfect judicial interpretation on the basis of raising questions and drawing lessons from Korea and Japan.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.34

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 楊江瀅;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗認(rèn)定初探[J];哈爾濱市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

2 邱靈;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為的定性分析[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年02期

3 陳燦;;誹謗罪的立法完善研究[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)月刊;2011年06期

4 最高人民法院刑三庭課題組;薛美琴;;利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)施的誹謗犯罪研究[J];人民司法;2012年21期

5 于沖;;“網(wǎng)絡(luò)打手”的刑法規(guī)制[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(法治論叢);2011年04期

6 趙遠(yuǎn);;網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗的刑事責(zé)任問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2010年08期

7 于志剛;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪與中國(guó)刑法應(yīng)對(duì)[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年03期

8 黃芙蓉;;新媒體時(shí)代網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗的構(gòu)成與責(zé)任探析[J];學(xué)習(xí)與實(shí)踐;2013年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：2344301