火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的法律救濟(jì)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-18 17:37
【摘要】：火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定是公安消防機(jī)構(gòu)重要的法定職責(zé)，但司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的性質(zhì)產(chǎn)生了嚴(yán)重的分歧。由于新《消防法》的出臺(tái)，取消了公安消防機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)火災(zāi)事故“責(zé)任”的認(rèn)定，加之公安部在此前的文件中關(guān)于火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的規(guī)定存在沖突，使得火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定在司法實(shí)踐和法律規(guī)范中產(chǎn)生了不同的觀點(diǎn)和爭(zhēng)議。“火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定”和“火災(zāi)事故認(rèn)定”兩個(gè)不同的概念使理論學(xué)者對(duì)公安消防機(jī)構(gòu)的職責(zé)產(chǎn)生了不同認(rèn)識(shí)，特別是對(duì)火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定行為的可訴性分析，也由此產(chǎn)生救濟(jì)途徑的不同爭(zhēng)議，這嚴(yán)重制約了公安消防機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任的調(diào)查工作和對(duì)火災(zāi)事故當(dāng)事人權(quán)益的保護(hù)。本文從保護(hù)行政相對(duì)人權(quán)益和維護(hù)法律權(quán)威的角度出發(fā)，就火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的概念及法律屬性、火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的可訴性及救濟(jì)途徑、火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定結(jié)論在民刑部門法中的思考進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)闡述。 根據(jù)法律實(shí)務(wù)工作者在司法實(shí)踐中的做法和法學(xué)者關(guān)于火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的理論，，通過結(jié)合消防法律法規(guī)的有關(guān)規(guī)定，本文對(duì)火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定作出了自己的定義，從行政法角度對(duì)行政訴訟受案范圍的規(guī)定進(jìn)行分析，并對(duì)火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的法律性質(zhì)進(jìn)行了定性，通過分析本文明確觀點(diǎn)：火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定是一種行政確認(rèn)行為，是一種具有特殊性的具體行政行為，根據(jù)法律法規(guī)的規(guī)定應(yīng)屬于行政訴訟受案范圍。本文主要從火災(zāi)事故認(rèn)定主體、火災(zāi)事故認(rèn)定的法律性質(zhì)、我國(guó)行政訴訟法受案范圍對(duì)火災(zāi)事故認(rèn)定的可訴性進(jìn)行了分析，并對(duì)比介紹了有關(guān)火災(zāi)事故認(rèn)定行為不可訴的觀點(diǎn)。本文最重要部分，是針對(duì)在司法實(shí)踐中存在的火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的爭(zhēng)議，根據(jù)第二部分關(guān)于火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的可訴性分析，提出了在火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定發(fā)生爭(zhēng)議后的行政救濟(jì)途徑，本文認(rèn)為應(yīng)該包括：行政復(fù)議、行政救濟(jì)、國(guó)家賠償、行政聲明異議。通過對(duì)本部分內(nèi)容的闡述，希望對(duì)維護(hù)行政相對(duì)人的權(quán)益起到積極的促進(jìn)作用。最后，本文主要針對(duì)在民事或刑事訴訟中，火災(zāi)事故認(rèn)定書在訴訟活動(dòng)中的作用及在運(yùn)用中存在的問題進(jìn)行了觀點(diǎn)闡述。
[Abstract]:The determination of responsibility for fire accident is an important legal duty of public security fire protection organization, but in judicial practice there are serious differences on the nature of responsibility determination of fire accident. As a result of the introduction of the new "Fire Protection Law," the public security fire protection agencies have been cancelled from their "responsibility" for fire accidents. In addition, in the previous documents of the Ministry of Public Security, there was a conflict in the provisions on the determination of responsibility for fire accidents. It makes the responsibility of fire accident in the judicial practice and legal norms produced different views and disputes. The two different concepts of "responsibility determination of fire accident" and "identification of fire accident" have made the theorists have different understanding of the responsibility of public security fire protection institutions, especially the analysis of the actionable behavior of the responsibility determination of fire accidents. There are also different disputes on the ways of relief, which seriously restricts the investigation of the fire accident responsibility and the protection of the rights and interests of the parties involved in the fire accident. From the point of view of protecting the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and maintaining the legal authority, this paper discusses the concept and legal attribute of the responsibility for fire accident, the justiciability of the responsibility for the fire accident and the ways of relief. The conclusion of responsibility determination of fire accident is systematically expounded in the law of civil and criminal law. According to the practice of legal practitioners in judicial practice and the theory of liability determination of fire accident by legal scholars, this paper defines the responsibility of fire accident by combining the relevant provisions of fire protection laws and regulations. From the angle of administrative law, this paper analyzes the provisions of the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation, and makes a qualitative analysis of the legal nature of the determination of responsibility for fire accidents. Through the analysis of this article, it is clear that the determination of responsibility for fire accidents is an act of administrative confirmation. It is a specific administrative act with particularity, according to the regulation of laws and regulations, it should belong to the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation. This paper mainly analyzes the justiciability of fire accident from the main body of fire accident, the legal nature of fire accident determination, the scope of accepting cases of administrative procedure law in our country, and introduces the viewpoint that the fire accident cognizance act is non-actionable. The most important part of this paper is to aim at the dispute of responsibility determination of fire accident existing in judicial practice, according to the analysis of the litigability of responsibility determination of fire accident in the second part. This paper puts forward the ways of administrative relief after the dispute over the determination of responsibility for fire accident, which should include: administrative reconsideration, administrative relief, state compensation and dissent of administrative declaration. Through the elaboration of this part, we hope to promote the rights and interests of administrative counterpart. Finally, this paper mainly discusses the role of the fire accident cognizance document in the litigation activities and the problems existing in the application in the civil or criminal proceedings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.14;D924.3
本文編號(hào)：2340681
[Abstract]:The determination of responsibility for fire accident is an important legal duty of public security fire protection organization, but in judicial practice there are serious differences on the nature of responsibility determination of fire accident. As a result of the introduction of the new "Fire Protection Law," the public security fire protection agencies have been cancelled from their "responsibility" for fire accidents. In addition, in the previous documents of the Ministry of Public Security, there was a conflict in the provisions on the determination of responsibility for fire accidents. It makes the responsibility of fire accident in the judicial practice and legal norms produced different views and disputes. The two different concepts of "responsibility determination of fire accident" and "identification of fire accident" have made the theorists have different understanding of the responsibility of public security fire protection institutions, especially the analysis of the actionable behavior of the responsibility determination of fire accidents. There are also different disputes on the ways of relief, which seriously restricts the investigation of the fire accident responsibility and the protection of the rights and interests of the parties involved in the fire accident. From the point of view of protecting the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and maintaining the legal authority, this paper discusses the concept and legal attribute of the responsibility for fire accident, the justiciability of the responsibility for the fire accident and the ways of relief. The conclusion of responsibility determination of fire accident is systematically expounded in the law of civil and criminal law. According to the practice of legal practitioners in judicial practice and the theory of liability determination of fire accident by legal scholars, this paper defines the responsibility of fire accident by combining the relevant provisions of fire protection laws and regulations. From the angle of administrative law, this paper analyzes the provisions of the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation, and makes a qualitative analysis of the legal nature of the determination of responsibility for fire accidents. Through the analysis of this article, it is clear that the determination of responsibility for fire accidents is an act of administrative confirmation. It is a specific administrative act with particularity, according to the regulation of laws and regulations, it should belong to the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation. This paper mainly analyzes the justiciability of fire accident from the main body of fire accident, the legal nature of fire accident determination, the scope of accepting cases of administrative procedure law in our country, and introduces the viewpoint that the fire accident cognizance act is non-actionable. The most important part of this paper is to aim at the dispute of responsibility determination of fire accident existing in judicial practice, according to the analysis of the litigability of responsibility determination of fire accident in the second part. This paper puts forward the ways of administrative relief after the dispute over the determination of responsibility for fire accident, which should include: administrative reconsideration, administrative relief, state compensation and dissent of administrative declaration. Through the elaboration of this part, we hope to promote the rights and interests of administrative counterpart. Finally, this paper mainly discusses the role of the fire accident cognizance document in the litigation activities and the problems existing in the application in the civil or criminal proceedings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.14;D924.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 曹曉強(qiáng);火災(zāi)原因和事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的探討[J];成都電子機(jī)械高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
2 張淑芳;行政聲明異議制度研究[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期
3 蔡小雪;;關(guān)于當(dāng)前行政訴訟范圍若干爭(zhēng)議問題的研究[J];法律適用;2006年Z1期
4 陳娟;;行政聲明異議初探[J];武漢交通職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期
5 鄭自泉;;淺析火災(zāi)事故原因和責(zé)任認(rèn)定的可訴性[J];科技信息;2011年18期
6 陳凡凡;;試論火災(zāi)調(diào)查存在的問題和建議[J];科協(xié)論壇(下半月);2012年03期
7 夏欣平;;我國(guó)火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定制度亟待完善[J];商業(yè)文化(上半月);2012年04期
8 于緒亭,陳雪琴;論火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的可訴性[J];消防科學(xué)與技術(shù);2004年S1期
9 王健;王楷然;;當(dāng)前火災(zāi)事故調(diào)查工作的現(xiàn)狀分析及對(duì)策[J];消防技術(shù)與產(chǎn)品信息;2012年01期
10 楊愛勇;;對(duì)新《消防法》實(shí)施后開展火災(zāi)事故認(rèn)定的思考[J];中國(guó)新技術(shù)新產(chǎn)品;2012年06期
本文編號(hào)：2340681
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2340681.html
教材專著
