刑法中的明確性原則:一個比較法的研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-11-08 15:07
【摘要】:刑法明確性原則在德日具有憲法性地位,是刑法的首要原則;而在中國,刑法明確性原則還未獲得憲法性地位,且在排序上處于刑法的目的與任務之后。德日的刑法理論和刑法立法均強調(diào)刑法明確性原則由罪的明確性和刑的明確性構(gòu)成;而在中國,雖然理論上強調(diào)刑法明確性原則由罪的明確性和刑的明確性構(gòu)成,但立法上主要強調(diào)的是罪的明確性。刑法明確性原則的具體實現(xiàn)途徑在德日包括狹義的法律和空白刑法中需要參照的法律法規(guī)要明確,在少數(shù)情況下還要求特別授權(quán)的委任命令和判例具有明確性;而在中國,刑法明確性原則的具體實現(xiàn)途徑除了要求狹義的法律和空白罪狀中需要參照的法律法規(guī)具有明確性之外,還要求刑法司法解釋具備明確性。通過比較研究發(fā)現(xiàn),德日刑法明確性原則的法律地位和內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)值得中國學習,但在具體實現(xiàn)途徑上應當考量中國的特殊性。
[Abstract]:The principle of clarity of criminal law has constitutional status in Germany and Japan, which is the primary principle of criminal law, while in China, the principle of clarity of criminal law has not obtained constitutional status, and is in the order behind the purpose and task of criminal law. Both the theory of criminal law and the legislation of criminal law in Germany and Japan emphasize that the principle of clarity of criminal law consists of the clarity of crime and the clarity of punishment. In China, although the principle of clarity of criminal law is made up of the clarity of the crime and the definition of the punishment in theory, the clarity of the crime is mainly emphasized in the legislation. The specific way to realize the principle of clarity of criminal law is clear in Germany and Japan, including the narrow law and blank criminal law. In a few cases, it also requires that the specially authorized appointment orders and precedents be clear. In China, the specific way to realize the principle of clarity of criminal law requires not only the clarity of the narrow sense of law and the laws and regulations that need to be referred to in the blank crime, but also the clarity of the judicial interpretation of the criminal law. Through the comparative study, it is found that the legal status and internal structure of the principle of clarity of criminal law in Germany and Japan are worthy of China's study, but the particularity of China should be considered in the specific way of realization.
【作者單位】: 中央民族大學法學院;
【基金】:筆者主持的國家社科基金一般項目“環(huán)境犯罪刑法治理的早期化問題研究”(項目批準號:17BFX071)的階段性成果之一
【分類號】:D924.1
本文編號:2318843
[Abstract]:The principle of clarity of criminal law has constitutional status in Germany and Japan, which is the primary principle of criminal law, while in China, the principle of clarity of criminal law has not obtained constitutional status, and is in the order behind the purpose and task of criminal law. Both the theory of criminal law and the legislation of criminal law in Germany and Japan emphasize that the principle of clarity of criminal law consists of the clarity of crime and the clarity of punishment. In China, although the principle of clarity of criminal law is made up of the clarity of the crime and the definition of the punishment in theory, the clarity of the crime is mainly emphasized in the legislation. The specific way to realize the principle of clarity of criminal law is clear in Germany and Japan, including the narrow law and blank criminal law. In a few cases, it also requires that the specially authorized appointment orders and precedents be clear. In China, the specific way to realize the principle of clarity of criminal law requires not only the clarity of the narrow sense of law and the laws and regulations that need to be referred to in the blank crime, but also the clarity of the judicial interpretation of the criminal law. Through the comparative study, it is found that the legal status and internal structure of the principle of clarity of criminal law in Germany and Japan are worthy of China's study, but the particularity of China should be considered in the specific way of realization.
【作者單位】: 中央民族大學法學院;
【基金】:筆者主持的國家社科基金一般項目“環(huán)境犯罪刑法治理的早期化問題研究”(項目批準號:17BFX071)的階段性成果之一
【分類號】:D924.1
【相似文獻】
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 劉文杰;規(guī)范的構(gòu)成要件要素研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學;2014年
,本文編號:2318843
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2318843.html