【摘要】：量刑說理是指根據事實與法律對量刑進行學理分析與說明。我國刑事判決書在量刑時通常不說理或者說理粗疏化,其根源在于量刑說理難度大而法官說理能力相對不濟與法官擁有廣泛的自由裁量權。量刑說理應當以三段論為基礎,根據不同的量刑規(guī)范命題的結構形式區(qū)別對待。量刑說理需要論證量刑結論具有較高的可接受性,符合語用邏輯,說理用語應具有契合性與情景感,并適當運用修辭與對話方法。量刑說理的技術規(guī)制措施有:將刑事判決書中的"量刑理由"改成"量刑說理";實行實質說理制度;明確量刑說理繁簡分流的依據和標準;加強對量刑說理的審查和監(jiān)督;構建量刑判例信息庫。
[Abstract]:Sentencing reasoning refers to the theoretical analysis and explanation of sentencing according to facts and laws. The criminal judgment in our country is usually not reasonable or careless in sentencing, its root is that the reasoning of sentencing is difficult, the judge's reasoning ability is relatively poor and the judge has extensive discretion. Sentencing reasoning should be based on syllogism and be treated differently according to the structure of different sentencing norms. Sentencing reasoning needs to demonstrate that the conclusion of sentencing is more acceptable, in line with pragmatic logic, rational language should have a sense of fit and situational, and appropriate use of rhetoric and dialogue methods. The technical regulation measures of sentencing reasoning include: changing "sentencing reason" in criminal judgment to "sentencing reasoning"; implementing substantive reasoning system; clarifying the basis and standard of sentencing reasoning; strengthening the examination and supervision of sentencing reasoning; Construct the information base of sentencing case.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學王健法學院;
【基金】：2015年度司法部國家法治與法學理論研究項目“量刑雙軌制研究”(15SFB2016)的階段性成果 江蘇高校區(qū)域法治發(fā)展協同創(chuàng)新中心研究成果
【分類號】：D924.13

【相似文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 王奧琪;挪用型犯罪量刑問題研究[D];黑龍江大學;2015年

，

本文編號：2318501