【摘要】：以危險方法危害公共安全罪在司法適用中的擴大化問題引起了我國刑法學界的關注。從碰瓷、盜竊窨井蓋再到醉酒駕車、瘦肉精案件，許多原本不該被解釋進來的行為被納入此罪進行評價。以危險方法危害公共安全罪的觸角延伸到社會生活的方方面面，產生了大量同案不同判的案例，違背了罪刑法定原則。 筆者認為，要解決以危險方法危害公共安全罪適用范圍擴張的現(xiàn)狀，就要從我國現(xiàn)行刑法理論出發(fā)，結合司法實踐，分析我國現(xiàn)行刑法關于該罪規(guī)定的模糊點并逐一理清，嚴格界定該罪的適用范圍。 本文共分為三部分。第一部分介紹了以危險方法危害公共安全罪刑法規(guī)制的演變與立法背景，通過對79年刑法、97年刑法，以及刑法修正案、相關司法解釋法條規(guī)定的梳理，對本罪適用范圍有了初步認識，并為后文本罪適用范圍擴張的原因分析做了鋪墊；第二部分通過真實的社會熱點案例以及同案不同判的司法案例對比，展現(xiàn)以危險方法危害公共安全罪適用范圍不斷擴張的現(xiàn)狀，分析本罪適用范圍擴張帶來的弊端，從法條規(guī)定的模糊性和司法實務對本罪的曲解兩方面闡述本罪淪為“口袋罪”的原因。第三部分通過對相關文獻的搜索、比對，筆者對本罪相關爭議焦點進行了梳理，以限制該罪本身模糊的要素，防止由于理論上的不明確導致實踐中的擴大適用�；谧镄谭ǘㄔ瓌t和刑法相適應原則的要求，界定了本罪的客體——“公共安全”，并從內涵和認定兩方面來分析“以其他危險方法”行為。最后通過對第一章第一節(jié)所列的同案不同判的行為進行辨析，，再次從實務角度對本罪的司法適用問題進行闡釋。 我國目前的司法實踐領域中，以危險方法危害公共安全罪被擴張適用的趨勢日趨嚴重。因此，本文遵循罪刑法定原則的要求，從理論方面對該罪進行了較為系統(tǒng)地研究，從而對本罪適用范圍進行了限制。希望拙文能夠為理論研究提供一點啟發(fā)，對司法有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The expansion of the crime of endangering public security by dangerous method in the judicial application has aroused the concern of the criminal law circle of our country. From porcelain, scenting covers to drunken driving, lean meatloin cases, many actions that should not have been explained were included in the crime to be evaluated. The tentacles of endangering public security crimes by dangerous methods extend to all aspects of social life, resulting in a large number of cases of different judgments in the same case, which violates the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime. The author believes that in order to solve the problem of expanding the scope of application of the crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods, we must proceed from the current criminal law theory of our country, combine with the judicial practice, analyze the fuzzy points of the criminal law concerning this crime in our current criminal law and clarify one by one. The scope of application of the crime is strictly defined. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part introduces the evolution and legislative background of criminal law regulation of crimes endangering public security by dangerous methods, and combs the provisions of 79 years criminal law, 1997 criminal law, and the amendment of criminal law, and the relevant provisions of judicial interpretation law. The author has a preliminary understanding of the scope of application of this crime, and makes a preliminary analysis of the reasons for the expansion of the scope of application of this crime in the following articles. The second part compares the judicial cases with different judgments in the same case through the real social hot spot cases. Showing the current situation that the scope of application of the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous methods is constantly expanding, and analyzing the disadvantages brought by the expansion of the scope of application of this crime, From the fuzziness of the stipulation of the law and the misinterpretation of the crime in judicial practice, the paper expounds the reasons why the crime has become "pocket crime". In the third part, by searching and comparing the relevant documents, the author combs the focus of this crime, in order to limit the fuzzy elements of the crime itself and prevent the expansion of the application in practice due to the lack of clarity in theory. Based on the requirement of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime and the principle of adaptation of criminal law, this paper defines the object of the crime "public safety", and analyzes the "other dangerous methods" behavior from the aspects of connotation and cognizance. Finally, through the analysis of the behavior of different judgments of the same case listed in the first section of chapter one, the judicial application of this crime is explained again from the perspective of practice. In the field of judicial practice in our country, the crime of endangering public security by dangerous method is being expanded and applied more and more seriously. Therefore, in accordance with the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime, this paper makes a systematic study of the crime from the theoretical point of view, thus limiting the scope of application of the crime. I hope that this article can provide some inspiration for the theoretical research and benefit to the judiciary.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 于同志;;駕車“碰瓷”案件的司法考量——兼論具體危險犯的可罰性判斷[J];法學;2008年01期

2 于志剛;;危險駕駛行為的罪刑評價——以“醉酒駕駛”交通肇事行為為視角[J];法學;2009年09期

3 于志剛;李懷勝;;提供有毒、有害產品原料案件的定性思路[J];法學;2012年02期

4 于同志;;駕駛機動車“碰瓷”的司法認定[J];人民司法;2008年02期

5 張小虎;放火罪之理論探究[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2002年04期

6 高艷東;;量刑與定罪互動論:為了量刑公正可變換罪名[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2009年05期

7 孫萬懷;;以危險方法危害公共安全罪何以成為口袋罪[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2010年05期

本文編號：2293577