【摘要】：刑法中對幼女性權(quán)利的保護(hù)是衡量一國對未成年人保護(hù)水平的重要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。面對近年來我國異起的性侵害幼女案件,以及對性侵害幼女刑事法律的諸多爭議,正確解釋現(xiàn)行法及對現(xiàn)行法律提出完善建議,是當(dāng)前保護(hù)幼女權(quán)益的必然要求。本文分為三個(gè)部分,第一部分主要介紹我國刑事法律對幼女性權(quán)利保護(hù)的發(fā)展與演變過程,以及對“幼女”和幼女“性權(quán)利”兩個(gè)概念的界定。從立法上,我國針對幼女性權(quán)利刑事保護(hù)的立法日趨完善、明確。我國幼女為未滿14周歲的女性,幼女“性權(quán)利”區(qū)別于其他女性“性權(quán)利",它主要強(qiáng)調(diào)幼女的性隱私權(quán)、性教育權(quán)、性健康權(quán)、性救濟(jì)權(quán)等,不包括性承諾權(quán)。第二部分闡述了我國幼女性權(quán)利刑法保護(hù)中存在四個(gè)主要爭議：如何界定“幼女”；在歸責(zé)原則上適用嚴(yán)格責(zé)任抑或主客觀相一致原則,以及由此引發(fā)的成立性侵幼女的犯罪是否要求“明知”受害人為幼女的爭議；奸淫幼女行為應(yīng)認(rèn)定為強(qiáng)奸罪抑或奸淫幼女罪的爭議；嫖宿幼女罪是否應(yīng)當(dāng)廢除的爭議。第三部分在第一、二部分的基礎(chǔ)上對爭議問題及其它問題做出相應(yīng)觀點(diǎn)陳述。本文認(rèn)為針對性侵害幼女犯罪應(yīng)當(dāng)采用主客觀相一致原則,成立犯罪需要行為人明知對方為幼女,有證據(jù)證明確實(shí)不知?jiǎng)t不為罪；奸淫幼女犯罪的犯罪客體和既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不同于普通強(qiáng)奸罪,決定了奸淫幼女行為應(yīng)獨(dú)立成罪；嫖宿幼女罪的設(shè)立錯(cuò)誤地區(qū)分了良家與不良幼女,理應(yīng)廢除。此外,從古今中外對幼女的界定來看,我國幼女的年齡過低,將《刑法》中的幼女年齡提高至未滿18周歲,不但符合國際法規(guī)定,也有利于提升我國對幼女性權(quán)利的保護(hù)水平。
[Abstract]:The protection of the sexual rights of young girls in criminal law is an important standard to measure the level of protection of minors in a country. In the face of the different cases of infringing young girls in our country in recent years, and many disputes about criminal law of infringing young girls, it is necessary to correctly interpret the existing laws and put forward some suggestions to improve the rights and interests of young girls. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part mainly introduces the development and evolution of the protection of the sexual rights of young girls in our country's criminal law, as well as the definition of the concepts of "young girls" and "young girls' sexual rights". In terms of legislation, the criminal protection of sexual rights of young girls in our country is becoming more and more perfect and clear. The young girls in China are women under the age of 14. The "sexual rights" of the young girls are different from the "sexual rights" of other women. It mainly emphasizes the rights of sexual privacy, sex education, sexual health, sexual relief and so on, and does not include the right of sexual commitment. The second part expounds the four main disputes in the criminal law protection of the sexual rights of young girls in China: how to define "young girls", and how to apply the principle of strict liability or subjective and objective consistency in the principle of imputation. And whether the crime of sexual assault should require "knowing" that the victim is a young girl; whether the act of adultery should be regarded as rape or the crime of adultery; and whether the crime of whoring a young girl should be abolished. In the third part, on the basis of the first and second parts of the dispute and other issues to make a corresponding point of view. This article thinks that the crime against young girls should adopt the principle of consistent subjectivity and objectivity, and the establishment of the crime requires the perpetrator to know that the other party is a young girl, and it is not a crime to have evidence to prove that he does not know. The crime object and accomplished standard of the crime of adultery is different from the common crime of rape, which determines that the act of committing adultery should be independent crime; the establishment of the crime of whoring young girl distinguishes the good family from the bad young girl, and it should be abolished. In addition, according to the definition of young girls, the age of young girls in our country is too low. Raising the age of young girls in Criminal Law to less than 18 years old is not only in line with the provisions of international law, but also conducive to improving the level of protection of sexual rights of young girls in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 馮亞東,黃維智;論奸淫幼女罪的“明知”問題——兼論幼女標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的確定[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年02期

2 劉仁文;奸淫幼女與嚴(yán)格責(zé)任——就“高法”司法解釋與蘇力先生商榷[J];法學(xué);2003年10期

3 劉春;任瑞紅;;對性侵害未成年人行為的罪名思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年35期

4 劉建利;;日本性侵未成年人犯罪的法律規(guī)制及其對我國的啟示[J];青少年犯罪問題;2014年01期

5 彭文華;;嫖宿幼女罪之罪刑辨析[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年06期

6 邱興隆;一個(gè)半公正的司法解釋——兼與蘇力教授對話[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年06期

7 劉明祥;日本刑法中的奸淫幼女犯罪及對我國刑法的啟示[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

8 趙合俊;性權(quán)與人權(quán)——從《性權(quán)宣言》說起[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2002年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2292311