財產(chǎn)毀損行為的刑法評價問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-24 11:16
【摘要】：在財產(chǎn)犯罪中，毀損財物的行為時有發(fā)生，其對財產(chǎn)罪各罪刑法評價所產(chǎn)生的影響自然是不言而喻的。盡管我國刑法規(guī)定了故意毀壞財物罪，但顯然不能涵蓋評價財產(chǎn)犯罪中的所有毀損行為，同時理論界也缺乏相關(guān)體系化的論述。有鑒于此，對于被立法與刑法理論所忽略的毀損行為，本文將做以系統(tǒng)的分析與研究，探尋其對財產(chǎn)罪各罪的刑法評價，即對于定罪量刑所產(chǎn)生的影響。從而在梳理毀損行為相關(guān)理論的同時，亦明確了各財產(chǎn)犯罪在涉及毀損財物行為等特殊情形時的定性問題。文章分為以下四個部分： 文章第一部分論述有關(guān)財產(chǎn)毀損意思的刑法評價問題。梳理有關(guān)非法占有目的的學(xué)說與爭論，并確定財產(chǎn)毀損意思的內(nèi)涵，即由毀損故意與排除意思組成。并根據(jù)行為人主觀毀損意思的有無，對行為人偷開他人機動車的行為進行定性。 文章第二部分論述有關(guān)財產(chǎn)毀損實行行為的刑法評價問題。本文列舉并分析以往關(guān)于“毀損”含義的學(xué)說爭論，同時在以往學(xué)說的基礎(chǔ)上，提出經(jīng)過限定了的“本來的用法侵害說”。對于特殊財物、特殊情形的毀損界定，，提供根據(jù)財物自身價值，與恢復(fù)財物原有狀態(tài)所付出的經(jīng)濟代價，進行對比判斷的方法。并分析了物理、功能性破壞與拋棄、隱匿兩類毀損實行行為的表現(xiàn)形式。 文章第三部分論述有關(guān)財產(chǎn)毀損對象的刑法評價問題。列舉了動物、證券以及違禁品三種特殊行為對象。通過論證分析，得出動物以及資格證券能夠成為毀損對象，而股票與違禁品不能成為毀損對象的結(jié)論。 在文章的第四部分，為了避免傳統(tǒng)罪數(shù)論的理論缺陷，本文采用競合論的解釋方法，去詮釋財產(chǎn)毀損行為與財產(chǎn)犯罪的犯罪構(gòu)成、罪名以及刑法規(guī)范之間的關(guān)系。依照競合論原理，將財產(chǎn)毀損行為所引發(fā)的犯罪競合問題分為假象競合與真實競合兩部分。在假象競合部分，分析并論述財產(chǎn)毀損行為所產(chǎn)生的法條競合，以及共罰的事后毀損行為刑事責(zé)任的確定。在真實競合部分，討論與財產(chǎn)毀損行為相關(guān)的想象競合、牽連關(guān)系以及實質(zhì)競合刑事責(zé)任確定等問題。
[Abstract]:In the property crime, the behavior of destroying property occurs from time to time, and its influence on the criminal law evaluation of every crime of property crime is self-evident. Although the criminal law of our country provides for the crime of intentionally destroying property, it obviously can not cover all the acts of damage in evaluating the crime of property, and at the same time, the theoretical circle also lacks the related systematization discussion. In view of this, this paper will make a systematic analysis and research on the damage behavior ignored by the legislation and the theory of criminal law, and explore the criminal law evaluation of each crime of property crime, that is, the influence on the conviction and sentencing. While combing the relevant theories of damage behavior, the qualitative problems of property crimes in special cases such as damage to property are also clarified. The article is divided into the following four parts: the first part discusses the criminal law evaluation of the meaning of property damage. This paper combs the theories and debates about the purpose of illegal possession and determines the connotation of the meaning of property damage, that is, it is composed of intent of damage and intention of exclusion. According to the subjective intent of the perpetrator, the behavior of stealing other people's motor vehicle is analyzed qualitatively. The second part discusses the criminal law evaluation of property destruction. This paper enumerates and analyzes the previous arguments about the meaning of "damage", and puts forward the "original usages encroachment theory" based on the previous theories. For the special property, the damage definition of the special case provides the method of comparing and judging according to the value of the property itself and the economic price paid by restoring the original state of the property. The forms of physical, functional destruction, abandonment and concealment are analyzed. The third part of the article discusses the criminal law evaluation of the object of property damage. This paper lists three kinds of special behavior objects, such as animals, securities and contraband. Through demonstration and analysis, it is concluded that animals and qualification securities can be damaged, but stocks and contraband cannot be damaged. In the fourth part of the article, in order to avoid the theoretical defects of the traditional number theory of crime, this paper uses the explanation method of concurrence theory to explain the relationship between the crime of property damage and the crime of property crime, the charge and the norms of criminal law. According to the theory of concurrence, the problem of criminal concurrence caused by property damage is divided into two parts: false coincidence and real concurrence. In the part of false concurrence, the article analyzes and discusses the concurrence of laws arising from property damage, and the determination of criminal liability of afterwards damage behavior. In the part of real concurrence, this paper discusses some problems such as imaginative concurrence, implicating relation and criminal liability determination related to property damage behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
本文編號：2291235
[Abstract]:In the property crime, the behavior of destroying property occurs from time to time, and its influence on the criminal law evaluation of every crime of property crime is self-evident. Although the criminal law of our country provides for the crime of intentionally destroying property, it obviously can not cover all the acts of damage in evaluating the crime of property, and at the same time, the theoretical circle also lacks the related systematization discussion. In view of this, this paper will make a systematic analysis and research on the damage behavior ignored by the legislation and the theory of criminal law, and explore the criminal law evaluation of each crime of property crime, that is, the influence on the conviction and sentencing. While combing the relevant theories of damage behavior, the qualitative problems of property crimes in special cases such as damage to property are also clarified. The article is divided into the following four parts: the first part discusses the criminal law evaluation of the meaning of property damage. This paper combs the theories and debates about the purpose of illegal possession and determines the connotation of the meaning of property damage, that is, it is composed of intent of damage and intention of exclusion. According to the subjective intent of the perpetrator, the behavior of stealing other people's motor vehicle is analyzed qualitatively. The second part discusses the criminal law evaluation of property destruction. This paper enumerates and analyzes the previous arguments about the meaning of "damage", and puts forward the "original usages encroachment theory" based on the previous theories. For the special property, the damage definition of the special case provides the method of comparing and judging according to the value of the property itself and the economic price paid by restoring the original state of the property. The forms of physical, functional destruction, abandonment and concealment are analyzed. The third part of the article discusses the criminal law evaluation of the object of property damage. This paper lists three kinds of special behavior objects, such as animals, securities and contraband. Through demonstration and analysis, it is concluded that animals and qualification securities can be damaged, but stocks and contraband cannot be damaged. In the fourth part of the article, in order to avoid the theoretical defects of the traditional number theory of crime, this paper uses the explanation method of concurrence theory to explain the relationship between the crime of property damage and the crime of property crime, the charge and the norms of criminal law. According to the theory of concurrence, the problem of criminal concurrence caused by property damage is divided into two parts: false coincidence and real concurrence. In the part of false concurrence, the article analyzes and discusses the concurrence of laws arising from property damage, and the determination of criminal liability of afterwards damage behavior. In the part of real concurrence, this paper discusses some problems such as imaginative concurrence, implicating relation and criminal liability determination related to property damage behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳洪兵;;論財產(chǎn)犯罪之間的界限與競合[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評論;2010年01期
2 郭澤強,邵劭;對傳統(tǒng)盜竊罪客體要件的追問[J];鄂州大學(xué)學(xué)報;2001年01期
3 張明楷;論財產(chǎn)罪的非法占有目的[J];法商研究;2005年05期
4 桂亞勝;;論事后的非法占有目的[J];法商研究;2012年04期
5 譚明;;論盜竊罪的不法領(lǐng)得意思——兼析盜竊罪與毀棄罪之法條關(guān)系[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2010年04期
6 黃國盛;;盜竊罪與故意毀壞財物罪的區(qū)別研究——兼論《關(guān)于審理盜竊案件具體運用法律若干問題的意見》第12條第4項的理解與適用[J];中國檢察官;2010年24期
7 劉明祥;刑法中的非法占有目的[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年02期
8 陳洪兵;;認真評價本犯的事后行為[J];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期
9 左袖陽;;盜竊罪與故意毀壞財物罪的區(qū)分[J];中國檢察官;2013年02期
10 陳洪兵;;財產(chǎn)犯的排除意思與利用意思[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2013年03期
本文編號：2291235
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2291235.html
教材專著
