原因自由行為理論困境與出路
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-20 08:09
【摘要】：原因自由行為理論是大陸法系中的一個(gè)重要理論。雖然現(xiàn)代各國(guó)刑事法治均認(rèn)為原因自由行為具有可罰性，，但在刑法理論體系中，原因自由行為卻與“責(zé)任與行為同時(shí)存在”原則產(chǎn)生了看似不可調(diào)和的沖突。 本文著重討論故意自陷的原因自由行為的故意犯的可罰性根據(jù)問題。全文分析了中外學(xué)者嘗試解決原因自由行為可罰性根據(jù)的四種學(xué)說(shuō)的缺陷，并以新的行為概念做支撐，以“過(guò)程”為切入點(diǎn)，分析了故意自陷的原因自由行為的故意犯的行為性，同時(shí)利用新行為概念下著手的三個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，界定出了故意自陷的原因自由行為的故意犯的著手時(shí)點(diǎn)，最終對(duì)故意自陷的原因自由行為的故意犯的可罰性根據(jù)做出自己的解釋。 全文除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外，共分三個(gè)部分，各部分主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一部分，原因自由行為理論的概述。這一部分介紹了原因自由行為概念的爭(zhēng)議，并對(duì)原因自由行為的范圍從責(zé)任能力狀態(tài)和主觀罪過(guò)進(jìn)行界定，明確了文章研究的重點(diǎn)，即故意自陷的原因自由行為的故意犯的可罰性根據(jù)問題。 第二部分，原因自由行為理論的困境。這一部分分別介紹了原因自由行為理論中四種代表性的學(xué)說(shuō)，即意思決定說(shuō)、原因行為支配可能性說(shuō)、責(zé)任例外說(shuō)、間接正犯說(shuō)的觀點(diǎn)和缺陷。 第三部分，原因自由行為理論的出路。這一部分首先提出了新的行為概念和犯罪行為的概念，并在新的犯罪行為的概念下闡述了犯罪主體要件和主觀要件，確定了新行為概念下著手的三個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，這為解決故意自陷的原因自由行為的故意犯可罰性根據(jù)問題提供了理論支撐。其次，論述了新行為概念下原因自由行為的概念、行為性質(zhì)、著手的時(shí)點(diǎn)，最終解決了其可罰性根據(jù)問題。最后，在我國(guó)犯罪論體系下論述了故意自陷的原因自由行為的故意犯的構(gòu)成要件，明確了其可罰性。
[Abstract]:The theory of cause-free behavior is an important theory in the civil law system. Although the criminal law of modern countries all think that the free act of reason has the character of punishment, but in the theory system of criminal law, the principle of the free act of reason and the principle of "simultaneous existence of responsibility and behavior" produce seemingly irreconcilable conflict. In this paper, we mainly discuss the penalty basis of intentional crime of free act due to the reason of intentional self-trapping. This paper analyzes the defects of the four theories that Chinese and foreign scholars try to solve the penalty basis of the cause free behavior, and takes the new concept of behavior as the support and the "process" as the breakthrough point. In this paper, the author analyzes the behavior of intentional crime of the cause of intentional self-trapping, and at the same time defines the starting point of intentional crime of freedom of reason of intentional self-trapping by using the three standards under the new concept of behavior. Finally, the author makes his own explanation on the penalty of intentional crime of the free act of intentional self-trapping. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into three parts. The main contents of each part are as follows: the first part is an overview of the theory of free cause behavior. This part introduces the controversy of the concept of cause-free behavior, defines the scope of cause-free behavior from the state of responsibility ability and subjective guilt, and clarifies the focus of this article. That is to say, the reason of intentional self-trapping is the penalty basis of intentional crime of free act. The second part is the dilemma of the theory of free action. This part introduces four representative theories in the theory of cause-free behavior, that is, the theory of decision of intention, the theory of possibility of reason behavior, the theory of liability exception, and the view and defect of indirect principal offender theory. The third part, the reason free behavior theory outlet. This part first puts forward the new concept of behavior and the concept of criminal behavior, and under the new concept of criminal behavior, expounds the elements of the subject and subjective elements of the crime, and determines the three standards under the new concept of behavior. This provides theoretical support for solving the problem of the penalty of intentional crime. Secondly, this paper discusses the concept, nature and time of action of the cause free act under the new concept of behavior, and finally solves the problem of the basis of its penalability. Finally, under the crime theory system of our country, it discusses the constitutive elements of intentional crime of the free act of intentional self-trapping, and clarifies its penalability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D914
本文編號(hào)：2282560
[Abstract]:The theory of cause-free behavior is an important theory in the civil law system. Although the criminal law of modern countries all think that the free act of reason has the character of punishment, but in the theory system of criminal law, the principle of the free act of reason and the principle of "simultaneous existence of responsibility and behavior" produce seemingly irreconcilable conflict. In this paper, we mainly discuss the penalty basis of intentional crime of free act due to the reason of intentional self-trapping. This paper analyzes the defects of the four theories that Chinese and foreign scholars try to solve the penalty basis of the cause free behavior, and takes the new concept of behavior as the support and the "process" as the breakthrough point. In this paper, the author analyzes the behavior of intentional crime of the cause of intentional self-trapping, and at the same time defines the starting point of intentional crime of freedom of reason of intentional self-trapping by using the three standards under the new concept of behavior. Finally, the author makes his own explanation on the penalty of intentional crime of the free act of intentional self-trapping. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into three parts. The main contents of each part are as follows: the first part is an overview of the theory of free cause behavior. This part introduces the controversy of the concept of cause-free behavior, defines the scope of cause-free behavior from the state of responsibility ability and subjective guilt, and clarifies the focus of this article. That is to say, the reason of intentional self-trapping is the penalty basis of intentional crime of free act. The second part is the dilemma of the theory of free action. This part introduces four representative theories in the theory of cause-free behavior, that is, the theory of decision of intention, the theory of possibility of reason behavior, the theory of liability exception, and the view and defect of indirect principal offender theory. The third part, the reason free behavior theory outlet. This part first puts forward the new concept of behavior and the concept of criminal behavior, and under the new concept of criminal behavior, expounds the elements of the subject and subjective elements of the crime, and determines the three standards under the new concept of behavior. This provides theoretical support for solving the problem of the penalty of intentional crime. Secondly, this paper discusses the concept, nature and time of action of the cause free act under the new concept of behavior, and finally solves the problem of the basis of its penalability. Finally, under the crime theory system of our country, it discusses the constitutive elements of intentional crime of the free act of intentional self-trapping, and clarifies its penalability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D914
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 趙秉志;;論原因自由行為中實(shí)行行為的著手問題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年05期
2 馬克昌;責(zé)任能力比較研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2001年03期
3 錢葉六;刑法中的原因自由行為研究——兼論我國(guó)刑法第18條第4款立法的完善[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2004年06期
本文編號(hào)：2282560
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2282560.html
教材專著
